Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛患者中(人为假定的)中枢敏化的定义、评估及患病率:一项系统综述

The Definition, Assessment, and Prevalence of (Human Assumed) Central Sensitisation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Schuttert Ingrid, Timmerman Hans, Petersen Kristian K, McPhee Megan E, Arendt-Nielsen Lars, Reneman Michiel F, Wolff André P

机构信息

Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9750 RA Groningen, The Netherlands.

Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 17;10(24):5931. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245931.

Abstract

Central sensitisation is assumed to be one of the underlying mechanisms for chronic low back pain. Because central sensitisation is not directly assessable in humans, the term 'human assumed central sensitisation' (HACS) is suggested. The objectives were to investigate what definitions for HACS have been used, to evaluate the methods to assess HACS, to assess the validity of those methods, and to estimate the prevalence of HACS. Database search resulted in 34 included studies. Forty different definition references were used to define HACS. This review uncovered twenty quantitative methods to assess HACS, including four questionnaires and sixteen quantitative sensory testing measures. The prevalence of HACS in patients with chronic low back pain was estimated in three studies. The current systematic review highlights that multiple definitions, assessment methods, and prevalence estimates are stated in the literature regarding HACS in patients with chronic low back pain. Most of the assessment methods of HACS are not validated but have been tested for reliability and repeatability. Given the lack of a gold standard to assess HACS, an initial grading system is proposed to standardize clinical and research assessments of HACS in patients with a chronic low back.

摘要

中枢敏化被认为是慢性下腰痛的潜在机制之一。由于中枢敏化在人体中无法直接评估,因此提出了“人类假定中枢敏化”(HACS)这一术语。其目的是调查已使用的HACS定义,评估评估HACS的方法,评估这些方法的有效性,并估计HACS的患病率。数据库检索产生了34项纳入研究。使用了40种不同的定义参考文献来定义HACS。本综述发现了20种评估HACS的定量方法,包括4份问卷和16种定量感觉测试措施。三项研究估计了慢性下腰痛患者中HACS的患病率。当前的系统评价强调,关于慢性下腰痛患者HACS的文献中陈述了多种定义、评估方法和患病率估计。HACS的大多数评估方法未经验证,但已进行了可靠性和可重复性测试。鉴于缺乏评估HACS的金标准,建议采用初始分级系统来规范慢性下腰痛患者HACS的临床和研究评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31a6/8703986/0159c3b9ce60/jcm-10-05931-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验