亲密伴侣暴力的心理亚型及其对心理健康的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机构信息
National Centre of Psychotraumatology, Department of Psychology at the University of Southern Denmark, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Department of Psychology at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
出版信息
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 9;8(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1118-1.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Psychological violence is estimated to be the most common form of intimate partner violence (IPV). Despite this, research on the independent effect of psychological violence on mental health is scarce. Moreover, the lack of a clear and consistent definition of psychological violence has made results difficult to compare. The present study therefore aims to consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by conducting a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis on the association between psychological violence and mental health problems, when controlling for other types of violence (e.g. physical and sexual) and taking into account severity, frequency, and duration of psychological violence.
METHOD
The present study is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42018116026) and the study design follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; Additional file 1). A dual search will be conducted in the electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Data will be extracted using Endnote and Covidence and a meta-analysis will be conducted using Metafor-package in the programming language R. The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project will be used to assess the quality of the included studies (i.e. weak, moderate and strong).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The present review will help consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by evaluating whether frequency, severity or actual "type" of psychological violence produces the most harm. A thorough quality assessment will help overcome potential limitations regarding expected variations in terminology and assessment of psychological violence.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42018116026 .
背景/目的：心理暴力据估计是亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）中最常见的形式。尽管如此，关于心理暴力对心理健康的独立影响的研究却很少。此外，由于缺乏对心理暴力的明确和一致的定义，使得结果难以比较。因此，本研究旨在通过对心理暴力与心理健康问题之间的关联进行系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析，来整合关于心理暴力的知识，同时控制其他类型的暴力（如身体和性暴力），并考虑到心理暴力的严重程度、频率和持续时间。
方法
本研究在国际前瞻性系统评价登记处（PROSPERO；#CRD42018116026）注册，研究设计遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA；附加文件 1）。将在电子数据库 PsycINFO、PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 中进行双重搜索。将使用 Endnote 和 Covidence 提取数据，并使用编程语言 R 中的 Metafor 包进行荟萃分析。将使用有效公共卫生实践项目开发的定量研究质量评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量（即弱、中、强）。
结果和讨论
本综述将通过评估心理暴力的频率、严重程度或实际“类型”是否会产生最大危害，来帮助整合关于心理暴力的知识。彻底的质量评估将有助于克服术语和心理暴力评估方面可能存在的预期差异的潜在局限性。
系统评价注册
PROSPERO CRD42018116026。
Zotero 插件