Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Department of Bariatric and Foregut Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Sep;15(9):1541-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
The future of bariatric surgery depends largely on how effectively residents and fellows are trained. The challenge is to assure patient safety during training. Our study compares the impact of first assistants on patient outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
A retrospective review of primary, elective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy procedures performed in 2015 and 2016 from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participant user files was performed. Patient cohorts were categorized by the level of training of the surgical first assistant (FA). Multivariate regression models were developed to determine the impact of the FA level on patient outcomes, adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and co-morbid conditions.
Compared with an attending weight loss surgeon as FA, minimally invasive surgery fellows and general surgery residents were more likely to have an unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.422, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.196-1.691; OR 1.206, 95% CI 1.034-1.406, respectively, P < .0001) and were more likely to have a 30-day hospital readmission (OR 1.143, 95% CI 1.056-1.236; OR 1.127, 95% CI 1.055-1.204, respectively, P < .0001). Compared with having a weight loss surgeon as FA, operative duration was significantly longer for all other assistant levels, or no assistant (P < .0001).
The training level of the FA does not impact early patient mortality or reoperation rates after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. However, unplanned intensive care unit admissions and readmissions within 30 days were significantly associated with surgical resident or minimally invasive surgery fellow FAs. Further analysis is needed to understand this cause and effect; however, these data provide direction to redesign residency and fellowship training.
减重手术的未来在很大程度上取决于住院医师和研究员的培训效果如何。挑战在于确保培训期间患者的安全。我们的研究比较了第一助手对 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术患者结局的影响。
对 2015 年和 2016 年代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划参与者用户文件中的原发性、择期 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术进行回顾性分析。根据手术第一助手(FA)的培训水平对患者队列进行分类。建立多变量回归模型,以确定 FA 水平对患者结局的影响,调整患者人口统计学特征和合并症。
与减重外科医生作为 FA 相比,微创手术研究员和普通外科住院医师在 30 天内计划内入住重症监护病房(ICU)的可能性更高(比值比[OR] 1.422,95%置信区间[CI] 1.196-1.691;OR 1.206,95%CI 1.034-1.406,P<.0001),30 天内再次住院的可能性更高(OR 1.143,95%CI 1.056-1.236;OR 1.127,95%CI 1.055-1.204,P<.0001)。与减重外科医生作为 FA 相比,所有其他助手级别或无助手的手术时间明显更长(P<.0001)。
FA 的培训水平不会影响 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术或袖状胃切除术患者的早期死亡率或再次手术率。然而,计划外 ICU 入住和 30 天内再次入院与外科住院医师或微创手术研究员 FA 显著相关。需要进一步分析以了解其因果关系;然而,这些数据为重新设计住院医师和研究员培训提供了方向。