Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Dec;20(12):1605-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
To compare the clinical value of 3 frailty indicators in a screening pathway for identifying older men and women who are at risk of falls.
A prospective cohort study.
Four thousand Chinese adults (2000 men) aged ≥65 years were recruited from the community in Hong Kong.
The Cardiovascular Health Study Criteria, the FRAIL scale, and the Study for Osteoporosis and Fracture Criteria (SOF) were included for evaluation. Fall history was used as a comparative predictor. Recurrent falls during the second year after baseline was the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of the frailty indicators and fall history to predict recurrent falls. Independent predictors identified in logistic regression were put in the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to evaluate their performance in screening high-risk fallers.
Fall history predicts recurrent falls in both men and women (AUC: men = 0.681; women = 0.645) better than all frailty indicators (AUC ≤ 0.641). After adjusting for fall history, only FRAIL (AUC = 0.676) and SOF (AUC = 0.673) remained as significant predictors for women whereas no frailty indicator remained significant in men. FRAIL could classify older women into 2 groups with distinct chances of being a recurrent faller in people with no fall history (3.8% vs 7.5%), a single fall history (9.5% vs 37.5%), and history of recurrent falls (16.0% vs 30.8%). SOF has limited ability in identifying recurrent fallers in the group of older adults with a single fall history (no fall history: 3.9% vs 8.6%; single fall history: 10.2% vs 10.9%; history of recurrent falls: 16.5% vs 20.6%).
SOF and FRAIL could provide some additional prediction value to fall history in older women but not men. FRAIL could be clinically useful in identifying older women at risk of recurrent falls, especially in those with a single fall history.
比较 3 种虚弱指标在筛选路径中的临床价值,以识别有跌倒风险的老年男女。
前瞻性队列研究。
从香港社区招募了 4000 名年龄≥65 岁的中国成年人(2000 名男性)。
纳入心血管健康研究标准、衰弱量表和骨质疏松和骨折标准(SOF)进行评估。跌倒史作为比较预测因子。随访第二年的复发性跌倒为主要结局。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)用于评估虚弱指标和跌倒史预测复发性跌倒的能力。逻辑回归中确定的独立预测因子被放入分类和回归树(CART)分析中,以评估其在筛选高危跌倒者中的性能。
跌倒史预测男性和女性的复发性跌倒(AUC:男性=0.681;女性=0.645)优于所有虚弱指标(AUC≤0.641)。在调整了跌倒史后,只有衰弱量表(AUC=0.676)和 SOF(AUC=0.673)仍然是女性的显著预测因子,而男性中没有虚弱指标仍然是显著的预测因子。衰弱量表可以将老年女性分为两组,具有明显的复发性跌倒风险,在没有跌倒史的人群中(3.8%比 7.5%),有单次跌倒史(9.5%比 37.5%),有复发性跌倒史(16.0%比 30.8%)。SOF 在识别有单次跌倒史的老年人群中的复发性跌倒者方面能力有限(无跌倒史:3.9%比 8.6%;单次跌倒史:10.2%比 10.9%;复发性跌倒史:16.5%比 20.6%)。
SOF 和衰弱量表可以为老年女性的跌倒史提供一些额外的预测价值,但对男性没有帮助。衰弱量表在识别有复发性跌倒风险的老年女性方面具有一定的临床应用价值,尤其是在有单次跌倒史的女性中。