Suppr超能文献

基于应用程序的干预措施,用于预防学龄前儿童意外伤害:群组随机对照试验。

An App-Based Intervention for Caregivers to Prevent Unintentional Injury Among Preschoolers: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 9;7(8):e13519. doi: 10.2196/13519.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

App-based interventions have the potential to reduce child injury in countries with limited prevention resources, but their effectiveness has not been rigorously examined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an app-based intervention for caregivers of preschoolers to prevent unintentional injury among Chinese preschoolers.

METHODS

A 6-month cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2017 to June 2018. Recruitment was conducted through preschools, which were randomly allocated to either the control group (ie, app-based parenting education excluding unintentional injury prevention) or the intervention group (ie, app-based parenting education including unintentional injury prevention). A total of 2920 caregivers of preschoolers aged 3-6 years from 20 preschools in Changsha, China, were recruited offline through the schools. The primary outcome was unintentional injury incidences among preschoolers in the past 3 months; this measure was assessed through an online caregiver-report at the baseline visit and at 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits. Secondary outcome measures included caregivers' self-reported attitudes and behaviors concerning child supervision during the last week. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to assess the effectiveness of the app-based intervention on responses at 3 and 6 months after adjusting for sociodemographic variables, baseline level of the outcome variable, and engagement with interventions in the assigned group. All analyses were intention-to-treat. A per-protocol sensitivity analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 1980 of the 2920 caregivers completed the study. The mean age of participants was 32.0 years (SD 5.5) and 68.99% (1366/1980) of them were female. During the 6-month follow-up visit, unintentional injury incidence did not change significantly in either group: incidence in the intervention group went from 8.76% (94/1073) to 8.11% (87/1073), P=.59; incidence in the control group went from 9.4% (85/907) to 7.5% (69/907), P=.15. The changes did not differ between the groups (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.62). Changes in the average score in attitude concerning unintentional injury prevention were also similar between the groups (B .05, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.13). Changes in unintentional injury prevention behaviors were greater in the intervention group than in the control group after the intervention (B .87, 95% CI 0.33-1.42). Analyses of individual injury prevention behaviors showed that the intervention reduced three risky behaviors: unsafe feeding of children (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89); incorrectly placing children in cars (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.93); and allowing children to ride bicycles, electric bicycles, or motorcycles unsupervised (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99). The intervention also improved scores on three safety-focused behaviors: testing water temperature before giving children a bath (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.52); properly storing sharp objects (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.52); and safely storing medicines, detergents, and pesticides (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

The app-based intervention did not reduce unintentional injury incidence among preschoolers but significantly improved caregivers' safety behaviors. This app-based intervention approach to improve caregiver behaviors surrounding child injury risk offers promise to be modified and ultimately disseminated broadly.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-IOR-17010438; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=17376 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/75jt17X84).

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12889-018-5790-1.

摘要

背景

基于应用程序的干预措施有可能减少资源有限国家的儿童伤害,但它们的有效性尚未经过严格检验。

目的

本研究旨在评估基于应用程序的干预措施对幼儿照顾者的有效性,以预防中国学龄前儿童的意外伤害。

方法

2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 6 月期间进行了一项为期 6 个月的群组随机对照试验。通过幼儿园进行招募,幼儿园被随机分配到对照组(即,不包括意外伤害预防的基于应用程序的育儿教育)或干预组(即,包括意外伤害预防的基于应用程序的育儿教育)。来自中国长沙 20 所幼儿园的 2920 名 3-6 岁幼儿的照顾者通过学校线下招募。主要结局指标是过去 3 个月内幼儿的意外伤害发生率;通过基线访问和 3 个月和 6 个月随访访问的在线照顾者报告来评估。次要结局指标包括照顾者在上周内有关儿童监督的自我报告态度和行为。使用广义估计方程(GEE)来调整社会人口统计学变量、结局变量的基线水平以及在分配组中参与干预措施的情况后,评估基于应用程序的干预措施对 3 个月和 6 个月时的应答效果。所有分析均为意向治疗。还进行了符合方案敏感性分析。

结果

共有 2920 名照顾者中的 1980 名完成了研究。参与者的平均年龄为 32.0 岁(标准差 5.5),其中 68.99%(1366/1980)为女性。在 6 个月的随访期间,两组的意外伤害发生率均无显著变化:干预组从 8.76%(94/1073)降至 8.11%(87/1073),P =.59;对照组从 9.4%(85/907)降至 7.5%(69/907),P =.15。两组之间的变化没有差异(比值比[OR] 1.14,95%CI 0.80-1.62)。两组之间预防意外伤害态度的平均得分变化也相似(B.05,95%CI -0.03 至 0.13)。干预后,干预组的意外伤害预防行为变化大于对照组(B.87,95%CI 0.33-1.42)。对个别意外伤害预防行为的分析表明,干预措施减少了三种危险行为:儿童不安全喂养(OR 0.73,95%CI 0.60-0.89);儿童不正确放置在汽车中(OR 0.73,95%CI 0.57-0.93);允许儿童无人监督骑自行车、电动自行车或摩托车(OR 0.80,95%CI 0.64-0.99)。该干预措施还改善了三个以安全为重点的行为的评分:给孩子洗澡前测试水温(OR 1.26,95%CI 1.05-1.52);妥善存放尖锐物品(OR 1.24,95%CI 1.01-1.52);安全存放药品、清洁剂和农药(OR 1.24,95%CI 1.02-1.51)。

结论

基于应用程序的干预措施并未降低学龄前儿童意外伤害的发生率,但显著改善了照顾者的安全行为。这种基于应用程序的干预措施,旨在改善围绕儿童伤害风险的照顾者行为,有望进行修改,并最终广泛传播。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR-IOR-17010438;http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=17376(WebCite 存档地址:http://www.webcitation.org/75jt17X84)。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR2-10.1186/s12889-018-5790-1。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e636/6713040/d1a4a20dacd5/mhealth_v7i8e13519_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验