Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定与咪达唑仑-芬太尼用于手法复位前肩关节脱位的镇痛镇静:一项随机临床试验

Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam-Fentanyl in Procedural Analgesia Sedation for Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Masoumi Kambiz, Maleki Seyyed Javad, Forouzan Arash, Delirrooyfard Ali, Hesam Saeed

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2019;14(4):269-274. doi: 10.2174/1574887114666190809160419.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shoulder joint dislocation is the most common dislocation of joints in the body. To reduce the anterior shoulder dislocation, it is necessary to have analgesia and sedation.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, patients were divided into two equal groups. Group I received midazolam-fentanyl (0.05 mg/kg fentanyl at a dose of 1 µg/kg) for 10 minutes and group II received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg in the initial dose and then 0.2 µg/kg/h) for 10 minutes. The levels of analgesia according to VAS criteria and the time to reach desired sedation were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients participated in this study. The time to reach the desired sedation was 8.60 ± 2.3 minutes in the dexmedetomidine group and 11.27 ± 3.57 minutes in the midazolamfentanyl group (p= 0.001). Also, the VAS score in both midazolam-fentanyl and dexmedetomidine groups was 3.3 ± 1.24 and 2.57 ± 0.9, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (p=0.015). There was significant relationship between the time to reach desired sedation and the level of analgesia. Moreover, there was no significant difference between patient age and the time to reach the desired level of analgesia. During this study, no side effect was observed.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that dexmedetomidine provides a higher level of analgesia than midazolam-fentanyl. Moreover, it was also shown that dexmedetomidine causes quicker procedural sedation than midazolam-fentanyl.

摘要

背景

肩关节脱位是人体最常见的关节脱位。为了复位肩关节前脱位,需要进行镇痛和镇静。

方法

在这项随机临床试验中,患者被分为两组,每组人数相等。第一组接受咪达唑仑-芬太尼(芬太尼剂量为1μg/kg,共0.05mg/kg),持续10分钟;第二组接受右美托咪定(初始剂量为1μg/kg,然后以0.2μg/kg/h的速度输注),持续10分钟。比较两组根据视觉模拟评分法(VAS)标准的镇痛水平以及达到所需镇静状态的时间。

结果

共有60名患者参与本研究。右美托咪定组达到所需镇静状态的时间为8.60±2.3分钟,咪达唑仑-芬太尼组为11.27±3.57分钟(p=0.001)。此外,咪达唑仑-芬太尼组和右美托咪定组的VAS评分分别为3.3±1.24和2.57±0.9。差异具有统计学意义(p=0.015)。达到所需镇静状态的时间与镇痛水平之间存在显著相关性。此外,患者年龄与达到所需镇痛水平的时间之间无显著差异。在本研究过程中,未观察到副作用。

结论

本研究结果表明,右美托咪定比咪达唑仑-芬太尼提供更高水平的镇痛效果。此外,还表明右美托咪定比咪达唑仑-芬太尼能更快地实现程序性镇静。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验