• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Economic costs and benefits of treating mild hypertension: results from a cross-sectional model.

作者信息

Millar J A, Hansen P C

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1988 Oct 12;101(855):623-5.

PMID:3140147
Abstract

The economic value of treating mild hypertension in New Zealand was analysed using computer-based models which compared the major costs and benefits of treatment for 1 year in a notional population (n = 250,000) comprising equal numbers of middle-aged (45-65 yr) and elderly (greater than 65 yr) patients. The costs were those of the drugs and medical charges plus those of incidental illness in life years added by treatment. The benefits were increased productive output obtained by lower mortality and savings due to stroke treatment avoided in treated patients. Calculations were based on the age-specific risks attributable to hypertension found in observational studies, and on the actual benefits of treatment found in two clinical studies. Two models were studied. In model 1, not all hypertensive patients are diagnosed and not all treated patients are at risk. There was a large net cost with all measures of risk and/or benefit, varying from $80.5 m to $40.0 m. Model 2 assumed that all and only patients with hypertension are treated, and the corresponding figures were $71.4 m to -$9.6 m (ie, net benefit of $9.6 m), respectively. The net benefit was obtained only at the highest values of risk and risk reversal, and was due mainly to increased productive output in treated patients. Models were also sensitive to other factors such as altered drug costs. Calculation of the net cost of treating hypertension requires accurate evaluation of the attributable risk.

摘要

相似文献

1
Economic costs and benefits of treating mild hypertension: results from a cross-sectional model.
N Z Med J. 1988 Oct 12;101(855):623-5.
2
Is the pharmacological treatment of mild to moderate hypertension cost effective in stroke prevention?轻度至中度高血压的药物治疗在预防中风方面是否具有成本效益?
N Z Med J. 1988 Apr 13;101(843):167-71.
3
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
4
Cost-benefit of treating hypertension.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Dec;12(10):S65-70.
5
Cost-effectiveness of losartan-based therapy in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: a UK-based economic evaluation of the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study.氯沙坦治疗高血压合并左心室肥厚患者的成本效益:基于英国的氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点事件(LIFE)研究的经济学评估。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jan;20(1):51-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001939.
6
Cost analysis of different pharmacological treatment strategies in elderly hypertensives.老年高血压患者不同药物治疗策略的成本分析
Blood Press. 2005;14(2):107-13. doi: 10.1080/08037050510008940.
7
Treating mild to moderate hypertension: cost-effectiveness and policy implications.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16 Suppl 7:S126-8.
8
Economic evaluation of ASCOT-BPLA: antihypertensive treatment with an amlodipine-based regimen is cost effective compared with an atenolol-based regimen.ASCOT-BPLA的经济学评估:与基于阿替洛尔的治疗方案相比,基于氨氯地平的降压治疗方案具有成本效益。
Heart. 2008 Feb;94(2):e4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.127217. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
9
The benefits and risks of treating mild to moderate hypertension.
N Z Med J. 1989 Jul 26;102(872):377-9.
10
[Treatment of severe arterial hypertension: cost of drug prescriptions in accordance with ANAES guidelines].[重度动脉高血压的治疗:符合ANAES指南的药物处方费用]
Therapie. 2001 Mar-Apr;56(2):111-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effective intervention in stroke.中风的经济有效干预措施。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Dec;2(6):468-99. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202060-00007.
2
Economic constraints and prescribing patterns in New Zealand.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Sep;2(3):189-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202030-00002.