• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost-benefit of treating hypertension.

作者信息

Jönsson B G

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Dec;12(10):S65-70.

PMID:7769494
Abstract

AIM

To review earlier studies on the costs and benefits of treating hypertension and present new estimates of cost-effectiveness in relation to age, sex and level of blood pressure.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness of different classes of drugs was examined, according to different assumptions about risk reduction. Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per life-year gained and is based on the observed reductions in risk due to intervention. An extensive sensitivity analysis was performed. Swedish cost data were used for the estimates, and assumptions about clinical effects were based on a recent review of the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

An economic evaluation of antihypertensive treatment indicates that it is cost-effective to treat patients with a diastolic blood pressure of > or = 90 mmHg, except patients under 45 years of age. The presence of other risk factors increases the cost-effectiveness.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cost-benefit of treating hypertension.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Dec;12(10):S65-70.
2
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
3
The cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden: an analysis of the criteria for intervention and the choice of drug treatment.瑞典高血压治疗的成本效益:干预标准与药物治疗选择的分析
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Feb;10 Suppl 2:S23-6.
4
Economic costs and benefits of treating mild hypertension: results from a cross-sectional model.
N Z Med J. 1988 Oct 12;101(855):623-5.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension guidelines in South Africa: absolute risk versus blood pressure level.南非高血压指南的成本效益分析:绝对风险与血压水平
Circulation. 2005 Dec 6;112(23):3569-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.535922.
6
ESH-ESC guidelines for the management of hypertension.欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)高血压管理指南
Herz. 2006 Jun;31(4):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2829-3.
7
[Treatment of severe arterial hypertension: cost of drug prescriptions in accordance with ANAES guidelines].[重度动脉高血压的治疗:符合ANAES指南的药物处方费用]
Therapie. 2001 Mar-Apr;56(2):111-8.
8
[Cost-effectiveness of treatment of high blood pressure with losartan in Denmark].[丹麦氯沙坦治疗高血压的成本效益分析]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Oct 16;168(42):3623-6.
9
Cost-effectiveness of losartan-based therapy in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: a UK-based economic evaluation of the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study.氯沙坦治疗高血压合并左心室肥厚患者的成本效益:基于英国的氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点事件(LIFE)研究的经济学评估。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jan;20(1):51-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001939.
10
An economic evaluation of the 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate hypertension in Greece.2003年欧洲高血压学会-欧洲心脏病学会希腊轻度至中度高血压管理指南的经济学评估。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 Sep;18(9 Pt 1):1233-40; discussion 1241-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic aspects of hypertension treatment in Poland.波兰高血压治疗的经济学方面。
Arch Med Sci. 2014 Jun 29;10(3):607-17. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.32853. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
2
Frequency of cardiovascular events in patients treated with anti hypertensive agents: A cohort study based on claims data generated by primary care practice.接受抗高血压药物治疗患者的心血管事件发生率:一项基于基层医疗实践产生的理赔数据的队列研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2004 Sep;65(5):398-412. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2004.10.003.
3
Primary aldosteronism among newly diagnosed and untreated hypertensive patients in a Swedish primary care area.
在瑞典初级保健地区新诊断未治疗的高血压患者中的原发性醛固酮增多症。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Mar;29(1):57-62. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.554015.
4
Cost-effectiveness of elderly health examination program: the example of hypertension screening.老年健康检查项目的成本效益:以高血压筛查为例。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007 Jan;23(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70369-9.
5
[Cost-effectiveness of prevention of coronary disease in Germany].
Z Kardiol. 2005;94 Suppl 3:III/100-4. doi: 10.1007/s00392-005-1314-y.
6
Pharmacoeconomic burden of undertreating hypertension.高血压治疗不足的药物经济学负担
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(14):907-28. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422140-00002.
7
Pharmacoeconomics of antihypertensive drug treatment: an analysis of how long patients remain on various antihypertensive therapies.抗高血压药物治疗的药物经济学:关于患者接受各种抗高血压治疗的时长分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Feb;6(2):76-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03044.x.
8
Pharmacoeconomics of hypertension management: the place of combination therapy.高血压管理的药物经济学:联合治疗的地位
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(4):337-47. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119040-00002.