• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国缅因州 2 项肥胖预防政策的成本效益分析和利益相关者评估

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Stakeholder Evaluation of 2 Obesity Prevention Policies in Maine, US.

机构信息

Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Department of Public Health, College of Health Professions, University of New England, Portland, ME.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Nov-Dec;51(10):1177-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.07.005
PMID:31402290
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of and stakeholder perspectives on a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise tax and a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) policy that would not allow SSB purchases in Maine, US.

DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness simulation model combined with stakeholder interviews.

SETTING

Maine, US.

PARTICIPANTS

Microsimulation of the Maine population in 2015 and interviews with stakeholders (n = 14). Study conducted from 2013 to 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Health care cost savings, net costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from 2017 to 2027. Stakeholder positions on policies. Retail SSB cost and implementation cost data were collected.

ANALYSIS

Childhood Obesity Intervention Cost-Effectiveness Study project microsimulation model with uncertainty analysis to estimate cost-effectiveness. Thematic stakeholder interview coding.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, the SSB and SNAP policies were projected to reduce health care costs by $78.3 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI], $31.7 million-$185 million) and $15.3 million (95% UI, $8.32 million-$23.9 million), respectively. The SSB and SNAP policies were projected to save 3,560 QALYs (95% UI, 1,447-8,361) and 749 QALYs (95% UI, 415-1,168), respectively. Stakeholders were more supportive of SSB taxes than the SNAP policy because of equity concerns associated with the SNAP policy.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Cost-effectiveness analysis provided evidence of potential health improvement and cost savings to state-level stakeholders weighing broader implementation considerations.

摘要

目的

评估美国缅因州含糖饮料(SSB)消费税和补充营养援助计划(SNAP)政策的潜在成本效益和利益相关者观点,该政策将不允许在缅因州购买 SSB。

设计

成本效益模拟模型结合利益相关者访谈。

设置

美国缅因州。

参与者

2015 年缅因州人口的微观模拟和利益相关者访谈(n=14)。研究于 2013 年至 2017 年进行。

主要观察指标

2017 年至 2027 年的医疗保健成本节约、净成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。政策的利益相关者立场。收集零售 SSB 成本和实施成本数据。

分析

儿童肥胖干预成本效益研究项目微观模拟模型与不确定性分析,以估计成本效益。主题利益相关者访谈编码。

结果

在 10 年内,SSB 和 SNAP 政策预计将分别减少医疗保健成本 7830 万美元(95%不确定性区间[UI],3170 万美元至 1.85 亿美元)和 1530 万美元(95% UI,8320 万美元至 2390 万美元)。SSB 和 SNAP 政策预计将分别节省 3560 个 QALYs(95% UI,1447 至 8361)和 749 个 QALYs(95% UI,415 至 1168)。由于与 SNAP 政策相关的公平问题,利益相关者对 SSB 税的支持度高于 SNAP 政策。

结论和意义

成本效益分析为权衡更广泛实施考虑的州级利益相关者提供了潜在健康改善和成本节约的证据。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Stakeholder Evaluation of 2 Obesity Prevention Policies in Maine, US.美国缅因州 2 项肥胖预防政策的成本效益分析和利益相关者评估
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Nov-Dec;51(10):1177-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
2
Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives and disincentives for improving food purchases and health through the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): A microsimulation study.通过美国补充营养援助计划(SNAP)提高食品购买和健康水平的经济激励和抑制措施的成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Oct 2;15(10):e1002661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002661. eCollection 2018 Oct.
3
Reducing US cardiovascular disease burden and disparities through national and targeted dietary policies: A modelling study.通过国家和针对性饮食政策减轻美国心血管疾病负担及差异:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 6;14(6):e1002311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002311. eCollection 2017 Jun.
4
Nutritional policy changes in the supplemental nutrition assistance program: a microsimulation and cost-effectiveness analysis.补充营养援助计划中的营养政策变化:微观模拟和成本效益分析。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Oct;33(7):937-48. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493971. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax in California: Projected Benefits for Population Obesity and Health Equity.加州含糖饮料消费税:对人群肥胖和健康公平的预期效益。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Jan;66(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of a US National Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax With a Multistakeholder Approach: Who Pays and Who Benefits.采用多方利益相关者方法的美国国家含糖饮料税的成本效益:谁支付和谁受益。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Feb;109(2):276-284. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304803. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
Taxes and Subsidies for Improving Diet and Population Health in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Study.澳大利亚改善饮食与人口健康的税收与补贴:一项成本效益建模研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Feb 14;14(2):e1002232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002232. eCollection 2017 Feb.
8
Projected Impact of Mexico's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policy on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Modeling Study.墨西哥含糖饮料税政策对糖尿病和心血管疾病的预计影响:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 1;13(11):e1002158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002158. eCollection 2016 Nov.
9
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Nutrition Facts Added-Sugar Labeling and Obesity-Associated Cancer Rates in the US.营养成分表添加糖标识与美国肥胖相关癌症发病率的成本效益分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217501. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7501.
10
Cost Effectiveness of a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax in the U.S.美国含糖饮料消费税的成本效益
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.004.

引用本文的文献

1
How Is Scale Incorporated Into the Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Obesity or to Improve Obesity-Related Risk Factors: A Systematic Scoping Review.如何将量表纳入预防肥胖或改善肥胖相关危险因素干预措施的经济评估:一项系统综述。
Obes Rev. 2025 Sep;26(9):e13942. doi: 10.1111/obr.13942. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Evaluation of the Soda Tax on Obesity and Diabetes in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.加利福尼亚州汽水税对肥胖和糖尿病影响的评估:成本效益分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 13;10(1):23814683241309669. doi: 10.1177/23814683241309669. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
Simulated retail food environments: A literature review of systems science approaches to advance equity in access to healthy diets.
模拟零售食品环境:关于促进健康饮食获取公平性的系统科学方法的文献综述
Obes Rev. 2025 May;26(5):e13887. doi: 10.1111/obr.13887. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
Cost-effectiveness of a primary care-based Healthy Weight Clinic compared with usual care.基于初级保健的健康体重诊所与常规护理的成本效益比较。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024 Sep;32(9):1734-1744. doi: 10.1002/oby.24111.
5
The implications of policy modeling assumptions for the projected impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation on body weight and type 2 diabetes in Germany.政策模型假设对德国含糖饮料征税对体重和 2 型糖尿病预计影响的意义。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):2013. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19488-5.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Improved WIC Food Package for Preventing Childhood Obesity.改善 WIC 食品套餐预防儿童肥胖的成本效益。
Pediatrics. 2024 Jan 1;153(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063182.
7
Projected health and economic impacts of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Germany: A cross-validation modelling study.德国含糖饮料征税对健康和经济的预估影响:交叉验证模型研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 21;20(11):e1004311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004311. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Federal Food Program Participation and Beverage Intake Among Families With Low Household Income.家庭低收入者参与联邦食品计划与饮料摄入量。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 Jul;55(7):469-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.04.003.
9
The Health and Economic Impact of Using a Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax to Fund Fruit and Vegetable Subsidies in New York City: A Modeling Study.使用含糖饮料税为纽约市的水果和蔬菜补贴提供资金的健康和经济影响:一项建模研究。
J Urban Health. 2023 Feb;100(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00699-3. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
10
Modelling health and economic impact of nutrition interventions: a systematic review.营养干预措施的健康和经济影响建模:系统评价。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Apr;77(4):413-426. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01199-y. Epub 2022 Oct 4.