• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌中血管生成和抗血管生成 VEGFA 剪接变异体:接受伊立替康为基础化疗和贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者的前瞻性回顾性队列研究。

Angiogenic and Antiangiogenic VEGFA Splice Variants in Colorectal Cancer: Prospective Retrospective Cohort Study in Patients Treated With Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece.

Department of Medical Oncology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Dec;18(4):e370-e384. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2019.07.007
PMID:31402291
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alternative splicing of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) results in VEGFAxxxb antiangiogenic isoforms that fail to activate angiogenesis. Bevacizumab, widely used in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), binds both VEGFA and VEGFAxxxb isoforms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumors from metastatic CRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) + bevacizumab (n = 285) or FOLFIRI only (n = 75) were collected. The relative expression of VEGFA121a, 121b, 145a, 145b, 165a, and 165b was assessed with custom TaqMan-MGB assays and quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 101.5 months, left-sided primary CRC was a favorable prognosticator (median survival, 29.2 vs. 18.2 months; P = .015). Positive high VEGFA145b was an unfavorable factor for progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.44; P = .009) in patients who received FOLFIRI + bevacizumab, without prognostic significance in FOLFIRI-only patients (HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.44; P = .33). The adverse effect on PFS of 145b was more pronounced in patients with right-sided colon cancer (HR = 2.62; 95% CI, 1.35-5.12; P = .005), especially in those who received bevacizumab (HR = 2.85; 95% CI, 1.31-6.21; P = .008). In patients with right-sided colon primary tumors, isoform 121b correlated with inferior PFS (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.94-3.18; P = .076) and overall survival (OS; HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.08-3.72; P = .028). In patients with left-sided primary tumors, positive high 165b correlated with superior PFS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99; P = .044) and OS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90; P = .006). At multivariate analysis, right-sided primary tumor was associated with inferior PFS (HR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.64), while 145b consistently retained predictive significance for lack of benefit in PFS with bevacizumab (HR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.16-2.53). Multivariate analysis for OS showed that VEGFA165b expression was favorable in patients with left-sided but unfavorable in patients with right-sided primary tumors (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The antiangiogenic isoform VEGFA145b messenger RNA may predict resistance to bevacizumab. Differences in biological relevance and prognostic significance of various VEGFA isoforms were found for right- versus left-sided primary tumors.

摘要

背景

血管内皮生长因子 A(VEGFA)的选择性剪接导致 VEGFAxxxb 抗血管生成同工型无法激活血管生成。贝伐单抗广泛用于转移性结直肠癌(CRC)患者,可结合 VEGFA 和 VEGFAxxxb 同工型。

方法

收集接受一线 FOLFIRI(亚叶酸钙、5-氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂)+贝伐单抗(n=285)或仅 FOLFIRI(n=75)治疗的转移性 CRC 患者的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的原发肿瘤。使用定制的 TaqMan-MGB 测定法和定量 PCR 评估 VEGFA121a、121b、145a、145b、165a 和 165b 的相对表达。

结果

在中位随访 101.5 个月时,左侧原发性 CRC 是有利的预后因素(中位生存期 29.2 与 18.2 个月;P=0.015)。阳性高 VEGFA145b 是接受 FOLFIRI+贝伐单抗治疗的患者无进展生存期(PFS)的不利因素(危险比 [HR]1.66;95%置信区间 [CI],1.13-2.44;P=0.009),但在接受 FOLFIRI 治疗的患者中无预后意义(HR=0.70;95%CI,0.34-1.44;P=0.33)。145b 对 PFS 的不利影响在右半结肠癌患者中更为明显(HR=2.62;95%CI,1.35-5.12;P=0.005),尤其是接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者(HR=2.85;95%CI,1.31-6.21;P=0.008)。在右侧结肠原发肿瘤患者中,同工型 121b 与较差的 PFS(HR=1.73;95%CI,0.94-3.18;P=0.076)和总生存期(OS)(HR=2.0;95%CI,1.08-3.72;P=0.028)相关。在左侧结肠原发肿瘤患者中,阳性高 165b 与较好的 PFS(HR=0.76;95%CI,0.59-0.99;P=0.044)和 OS(HR=0.68;95%CI,0.52-0.90;P=0.006)相关。多变量分析显示,右侧原发肿瘤与较差的 PFS 相关(HR=1.28;95%CI,1.00-1.64),而 145b 始终与贝伐单抗治疗缺乏 PFS 获益相关(HR=1.71;95%CI,1.16-2.53)。OS 的多变量分析显示,VEGFA165b 表达在左侧患者中是有利的,但在右侧患者中是不利的(P<0.001)。

结论

抗血管生成同工型 VEGFA145b mRNA 可能预测贝伐单抗耐药。在右侧和左侧原发性肿瘤中,不同的 VEGFA 同工型在生物学相关性和预后意义方面存在差异。

相似文献

1
Angiogenic and Antiangiogenic VEGFA Splice Variants in Colorectal Cancer: Prospective Retrospective Cohort Study in Patients Treated With Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab.结直肠癌中血管生成和抗血管生成 VEGFA 剪接变异体:接受伊立替康为基础化疗和贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者的前瞻性回顾性队列研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Dec;18(4):e370-e384. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
2
Prospective validation of candidate SNPs of VEGF/VEGFR pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab.前瞻性验证血管内皮生长因子/血管内皮生长因子受体通路候选单核苷酸多态性在一线 FOLFIRI 联合贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者中的疗效。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 4;8(7):e66774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066774. Print 2013.
3
MAVERICC, a Randomized, Biomarker-stratified, Phase II Study of mFOLFOX6-Bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-Bevacizumab as First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.MAVERICC:贝伐珠单抗联合 mFOLFOX6 与贝伐珠单抗联合 FOLFIRI 一线治疗转移性结直肠癌的随机、生物标志物分层、Ⅱ期研究
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 15;25(10):2988-2995. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1221. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
Prognostic Value of ACVRL1 Expression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving First-line Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab: Results From the Triplet Plus Bevacizumab (TRIBE) Study.ACVRL1 表达对贝伐珠单抗联合一线化疗转移性结直肠癌患者预后的预测价值:TRIBE 研究结果。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):e471-e488. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
5
Continuation of Bevacizumab vs Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy After First Progression in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The UNICANCER PRODIGE18 Randomized Clinical Trial.KRAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌一线进展后继续贝伐珠单抗或西妥昔单抗联合化疗:UNICANCER PRODIGE18 随机临床试验
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):83-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4465.
6
Modified XELIRI (capecitabine plus irinotecan) versus FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan), both either with or without bevacizumab, as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (AXEPT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.改良 XELIRI(卡培他滨联合伊立替康)对比 FOLFIRI(亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康),二者均联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗,作为转移性结直肠癌的二线治疗(AXEPT):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、非劣效性、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):660-671. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30140-2. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Axitinib or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI or modified FOLFOX-6 after failure of first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study.一线治疗转移性结直肠癌失败后,阿昔替尼或贝伐珠单抗联合 FOLFIRI 或改良 FOLFOX-6 方案:一项随机 II 期研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Dec;12(4):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2013.09.001.
8
Prognostic Effect of Adenosine-related Genetic Variants in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Bevacizumab-based Chemotherapy.贝伐珠单抗为基础化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌中与腺嘌呤相关的遗传变异的预后影响。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Mar;18(1):e8-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
SPIRITT: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Panitumumab with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab with FOLFIRI as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Unresectable Wild Type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.SPIRITT:一项关于帕尼单抗联合FOLFIRI方案以及贝伐单抗联合FOLFIRI方案作为不可切除野生型KRAS转移性结直肠癌患者二线治疗的随机、多中心、II期研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015 Jun;14(2):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Capecitabine and Temozolomide versus FOLFIRI in RAS-Mutated, MGMT-Methylated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.卡培他滨和替莫唑胺对比 FOLFIRI 在 RAS 突变、MGMT 甲基化转移性结直肠癌中的应用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 1;26(5):1017-1024. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3024. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Splicing to orchestrate cell fate.剪接以协调细胞命运。
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2024 Dec 6;36(1):102416. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102416. eCollection 2025 Mar 11.
2
Pathway2Targets: an open-source pathway-based approach to repurpose therapeutic drugs and prioritize human targets.Pathway2Targets:一种基于开源途径的药物重定位方法,可优先考虑人类靶点。
PeerJ. 2023 Sep 29;11:e16088. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16088. eCollection 2023.
3
Alternative Splicing Events and Their Clinical Significance in Colorectal Cancer: Targeted Therapeutic Opportunities.
可变剪接事件及其在结直肠癌中的临床意义:靶向治疗机会
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;15(15):3999. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153999.
4
MicroRNA and Alternative mRNA Splicing Events in Cancer Drug Response/Resistance: Potent Therapeutic Targets.微小RNA与癌症药物反应/耐药中的可变mRNA剪接事件:强大的治疗靶点
Biomedicines. 2021 Dec 2;9(12):1818. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9121818.
5
Evaluation of Angiogenesis-Related Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers of Bevacizumab Treated Ovarian Cancer Patients: Results from the Phase IV MITO16A/ManGO OV-2 Translational Study.评估血管生成相关基因作为贝伐单抗治疗卵巢癌患者的预后生物标志物:IV期MITO16A/ManGO OV-2转化研究结果。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 14;13(20):5152. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205152.
6
Overview of serum and tissue markers in colorectal cancer: a primer for radiologists.结直肠癌的血清和组织标志物概述:放射科医生的入门指南。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Dec;46(12):5521-5535. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03243-0. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Alternative RNA Splicing-The Trojan Horse of Cancer Cells in Chemotherapy.可变剪接——化疗中癌细胞的特洛伊木马。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Jul 18;12(7):1085. doi: 10.3390/genes12071085.
8
Alternative splicing of mRNA in colorectal cancer: new strategies for tumor diagnosis and treatment.结直肠癌中 mRNA 的可变剪接:肿瘤诊断和治疗的新策略。
Cell Death Dis. 2021 Jul 30;12(8):752. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04031-w.
9
Correlations Between the Characteristics of Alternative Splicing Events, Prognosis, and the Immune Microenvironment in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌中可变剪接事件特征、预后与免疫微环境之间的相关性
Front Genet. 2021 Jun 14;12:686298. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.686298. eCollection 2021.
10
Tumor Microenvironment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Arbitrator in Patients' Outcome.转移性结直肠癌中的肿瘤微环境:患者预后的仲裁者
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 6;13(5):1130. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051130.