• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于中危子宫内膜癌的治疗,系统性淋巴结清扫术并不能改善肿瘤学结局。

Systematic lymphadenectomy for intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma treatment does not improve the oncological outcome.

作者信息

Candido Elaine C, Rangel Neto Osmar F, Toledo Maria Carolina S, Torres José Carlos C, Cairo Aurea A A, Braganca Joana F, Teixeira Julio C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101, Cidade Universitaria, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Av. John Boyd Dunlop, s/n - Jd. Ipaussurama, Campinas, SP, 13060-904 Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Apr 18;3:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100020. eCollection 2019 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100020
PMID:31403112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6687380/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the indication and performance of systematic lymphadenectomy (SL) in Stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC), at intermediate risk (FIGO IAG2/G3, IBG1/G2) on recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and survival.

STUDY DESIGN

194 women underwent hysterectomies by laparotomy, with SL (n = 95) or without SL (n = 99) between 1990 and 2014 was evaluated. Diagnosis period, age, BMI, comorbidities, stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy were analyzed. DFS and cancer-specific survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test, and recurrences by Cox regression.

RESULTS

SL was performed in 93% (41/44) of women managed before 1998 and decreasing after that (p < 0.001). SL was also more frequent if BMI under 35.0 kg/m (p < 0.001) and in women without comorbidities (p = 0.017). Distribution of age, stage and postoperative radiotherapy were not different between groups. There were 14 recurrences (7.4%), concentrated in the SL group (12 cases) and associated with Stage IAG3 (35.7%, p = 0.009). Longitudinal evaluation exhibited 95% of 5-year cancer-specific survival rate for non-SL group 88% for the SL group (p = 0.039), and DFS rate was 97% for the non-SL group 85% for the SL group (p = 0.004). Cox regression analyses exhibited Stage IAG3 (HR 6.48, IC95% 1.88-22.39; p = 0.003) associated with less DFS.

CONCLUSION

SL in surgical staging of EEC at intermediate risk presented no benefits regarding recurrences, DFS, and cancer-specific survival rate when compared to patients not submitted to complete surgical staging. Stage IAG3 had poor prognosis regardless treatment modality. Our results provide further evidence to support the current trend to avoid SL in the surgical approach to selected women.

摘要

目的

评估系统性淋巴结清扫术(SL)在I期子宫内膜样腺癌(EEC)处于复发、无病生存期(DFS)和生存率的中度风险(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IAG2/G3、IBG1/G2)患者中的适应证及效果。

研究设计

评估1990年至2014年间194例行开腹子宫切除术的女性,其中95例行SL,99例未行SL。分析诊断时间、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、分期及辅助放疗情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩检验分析DFS及癌症特异性生存率,采用Cox回归分析复发情况。

结果

1998年前接受治疗的女性中93%(41/44)行SL,之后比例下降(p<0.001)。BMI低于35.0kg/m的女性(p<0.001)及无合并症的女性(p=0.017)行SL更频繁。两组间年龄、分期及术后放疗分布无差异。共14例复发(7.4%),集中在SL组(12例),且与IAG3期相关(35.7%,p=0.009)。纵向评估显示,非SL组5年癌症特异性生存率为95%,SL组为88%(p=0.039);DFS率非SL组为97%,SL组为85%(p=0.004)。Cox回归分析显示IAG3期(风险比[HR]6.48,95%置信区间[IC95%]1.88 - 22.39;p=0.003)与DFS降低相关。

结论

与未接受完整手术分期的患者相比,中度风险EEC手术分期中的SL在复发、DFS及癌症特异性生存率方面无益处。无论治疗方式如何,IAG3期预后均较差。我们的结果为支持当前在特定女性手术中避免SL的趋势提供了进一步证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f90/6687380/c661c2802e32/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f90/6687380/35ce6e4daf6d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f90/6687380/c661c2802e32/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f90/6687380/35ce6e4daf6d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f90/6687380/c661c2802e32/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic lymphadenectomy for intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma treatment does not improve the oncological outcome.对于中危子宫内膜癌的治疗,系统性淋巴结清扫术并不能改善肿瘤学结局。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Apr 18;3:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100020. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Survival outcomes of women with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer: the impact of adjuvant treatment strategies.3 级子宫内膜样腺癌女性的生存结局:辅助治疗策略的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Mar;305(3):671-681. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06187-4. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.高危型子宫内膜癌患者辅助放化疗对比单纯放疗(PORTEC-3):一项国际性、开放标签、多中心、随机、III 期临床试验的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):295-309. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30079-2. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
The 10-year results after national introduction of pelvic lymph node staging in Danish intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients not given postoperative radiotherapy.丹麦对未行术后放疗的中危子宫内膜癌患者进行盆腔淋巴结分期后的 10 年结果。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.040. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
5
Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial.早期子宫内膜癌中腹腔镜与无淋巴结切除术开腹手术后的复发和生存:一项随机试验的长期结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Feb;164(2):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.019. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Survival implication of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for apparent early-stage uterine serous carcinoma.淋巴结切除术对手术治疗的明显早期子宫浆液性癌患者生存的影响。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(5):e64. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e64.
7
Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.淋巴管间隙浸润和主动脉旁阳性淋巴结组数量可预测子宫内膜癌淋巴结阳性患者的生存率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.026.
8
Whether intermediate-risk stage 1A, grade 1/2, endometrioid endometrial cancer patients with lesions larger than 2 cm warrant lymph node dissection?中危ⅠA 期、分级 1/2、肿瘤直径大于 2cm 的子宫内膜样型子宫内膜癌患者是否需要进行淋巴结清扫术?
BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3671-0.
9
Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Intermediate-/High-Risk Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in an Australian Cohort.早期中/高危型子宫内膜样腺癌的淋巴结切除术:澳大利亚队列的临床特征和结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Sep;27(7):1379-1386. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001039.
10
Systematic lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial cancer.早期子宫内膜癌的系统性淋巴结切除术。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05600-8. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Overexpression of the orphan nuclear receptor NR2F6 is associated with improved survival across molecular subgroups in endometrial cancer patients.核受体 NR2F6 的过表达与子宫内膜癌患者各分子亚组生存改善相关。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(10):7155-7164. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04632-2. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌淋巴结复发的详细分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Jul;11(7):2217-2224. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-2588.
3
Impact of lymphadenectomy on short- and long-term complications in patients with endometrial cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy.PORTEC-2 试验治疗中高危子宫内膜癌 10 年结果:辅助治疗中患者选择的改善。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(9):1067-1074. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0310-8. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Tumor Size, an Additional Risk Factor of Local Recurrence in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Large Multicentric Retrospective Study.肿瘤大小是低危型子宫内膜癌局部复发的附加危险因素:一项大型多中心回顾性研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):684-691. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001223.
3
National Cancer Database Report of Lymphadenectomy Trends in Endometrial Cancer.
淋巴结切除术对子宫内膜癌患者短期和长期并发症的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):811-819. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06396-5. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
4
Surgicopathological Outcomes and Survival in Carcinoma Body Uterus: A Retrospective Analysis of Cases Managed by Laparoscopic Staging Surgery in Indian Women.子宫体癌的外科病理结果与生存情况:对印度女性腹腔镜分期手术治疗病例的回顾性分析
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Aug 1;9(3):139-144. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_96_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Sep;27(7):1408-1415. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001005.
4
Gynecologic Oncologist Perspective About ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer.妇科肿瘤学家对欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)-欧洲妇科肿瘤学会(ESGO)-欧洲放射肿瘤学会(ESTRO)子宫内膜癌共识会议的看法。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):826-831. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000931.
5
Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer: Overtreatment Is the Main Issue.子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌患者的淋巴结转移:过度治疗是主要问题。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):748-753. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000937.
6
Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Staged FIGO IA G1/G2 Endometrial Cancer With a Tumor Size of More Than 2 cm.肿瘤大小超过2cm的手术分期为国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IA期G1/G2子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移发生率
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Mar;27(3):486-492. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000919.
7
A preoperative and intraoperative scoring system to predict nodal metastasis in endometrial cancer.一种预测子宫内膜癌淋巴结转移的术前及术中评分系统。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Apr;137(1):78-85. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12103. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
Call for Surgical Nodal Staging in Women with ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO High-Intermediate Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Multicentre Cohort Analysis from the FRANCOGYN Study Group.ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO 中高风险子宫内膜癌女性患者手术淋巴结分期的呼吁:来自FRANCOGYN研究组的多中心队列分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1660-1666. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5731-0. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
9
Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer.淋巴结切除术治疗早期子宫内膜癌。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):117-118. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4873.
10
ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)-欧洲妇科肿瘤学会(ESGO)-欧洲放射肿瘤学会(ESTRO)子宫内膜癌共识会议:诊断、治疗与随访
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):559-81. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 9.