• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极或温和的药物治疗传染病?个体和人群层面不同治疗目标之间的权衡。

Aggressive or moderate drug therapy for infectious diseases? Trade-offs between different treatment goals at the individual and population levels.

机构信息

Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Aug 12;15(8):e1007223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007223. eCollection 2019 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007223
PMID:31404059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6742410/
Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the major public health threats of the 21st century. There is a pressing need to adopt more efficient treatment strategies in order to prevent the emergence and spread of resistant strains. The common approach is to treat patients with high drug doses, both to clear the infection quickly and to reduce the risk of de novo resistance. Recently, several studies have argued that, at least in some cases, low-dose treatments could be more suitable to reduce the within-host emergence of antimicrobial resistance. However, the choice of a drug dose may have consequences at the population level, which has received little attention so far. Here, we study the influence of the drug dose on resistance and disease management at the host and population levels. We develop a nested two-strain model and unravel trade-offs in treatment benefits between an individual and the community. We use several measures to evaluate the benefits of any dose choice. Two measures focus on the emergence of resistance, at the host level and at the population level. The other two focus on the overall treatment success: the outbreak probability and the disease burden. We find that different measures can suggest different dosing strategies. In particular, we identify situations where low doses minimize the risk of emergence of resistance at the individual level, while high or intermediate doses prove most beneficial to improve the treatment efficiency or even to reduce the risk of resistance in the population.

摘要

抗微生物药物耐药性是 21 世纪主要的公共卫生威胁之一。为了防止耐药菌株的出现和传播,迫切需要采用更有效的治疗策略。常见的方法是用高剂量药物治疗患者,既可以迅速清除感染,又可以降低新出现耐药性的风险。最近,有几项研究认为,至少在某些情况下,低剂量治疗可能更适合减少宿主内抗微生物药物耐药性的出现。然而,药物剂量的选择可能会对人群水平产生影响,而这一点迄今为止还没有得到太多关注。在这里,我们研究了药物剂量对宿主和人群水平的耐药性和疾病管理的影响。我们开发了一个嵌套的两菌株模型,并揭示了个体和社区之间在治疗效益方面的权衡。我们使用了几种措施来评估任何剂量选择的效益。其中两个措施侧重于宿主水平和人群水平的耐药性的出现,另外两个措施侧重于整体治疗效果:爆发概率和疾病负担。我们发现,不同的措施可能会建议不同的剂量策略。特别是,我们确定了在某些情况下,低剂量可以最大限度地降低个体水平出现耐药性的风险,而高剂量或中剂量则最有利于提高治疗效率,甚至降低人群中耐药性的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/ce5a5b18d29f/pcbi.1007223.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/c71dbed7aef6/pcbi.1007223.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/16fdef9ca27f/pcbi.1007223.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/6c16b61359c0/pcbi.1007223.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/24f40d59d65f/pcbi.1007223.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/8f45af49a8b7/pcbi.1007223.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/b4266b942606/pcbi.1007223.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/22d4260e2a74/pcbi.1007223.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/ce5a5b18d29f/pcbi.1007223.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/c71dbed7aef6/pcbi.1007223.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/16fdef9ca27f/pcbi.1007223.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/6c16b61359c0/pcbi.1007223.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/24f40d59d65f/pcbi.1007223.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/8f45af49a8b7/pcbi.1007223.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/b4266b942606/pcbi.1007223.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/22d4260e2a74/pcbi.1007223.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a65a/6742410/ce5a5b18d29f/pcbi.1007223.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Aggressive or moderate drug therapy for infectious diseases? Trade-offs between different treatment goals at the individual and population levels.积极或温和的药物治疗传染病?个体和人群层面不同治疗目标之间的权衡。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Aug 12;15(8):e1007223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007223. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Drug-induced resistance evolution necessitates less aggressive treatment.药物诱导的耐药性进化需要采取不那么激进的治疗方法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 23;17(9):e1009418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009418. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Does High-Dose Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Prevent the Evolution of Resistance?大剂量抗菌化疗能否预防耐药性的产生?
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jan 28;12(1):e1004689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004689. eCollection 2016 Jan.
4
Integrating Antimicrobial Therapy with Host Immunity to Fight Drug-Resistant Infections: Classical vs. Adaptive Treatment.整合抗菌治疗与宿主免疫以对抗耐药性感染:传统治疗与适应性治疗
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 14;12(4):e1004857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004857. eCollection 2016 Apr.
5
Microbiome as a tool and a target in the effort to address antimicrobial resistance.微生物组作为解决抗微生物药物耐药性问题的工具和目标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 18;115(51):12902-12910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717163115.
6
Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的抗生素管理。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;32(2):215-27. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275534. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
7
Measuring the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs.衡量抗菌药物管理计划的影响。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016 Jun;14(6):569-75. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1178064. Epub 2016 May 3.
8
Efflux as a mechanism of antimicrobial drug resistance in clinical relevant microorganisms: the role of efflux inhibitors.外排作为临床相关微生物中抗菌药物耐药性的一种机制:外排抑制剂的作用
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017 Jan;21(1):23-36. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2017.1265105. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Evolutionary emergence of infectious diseases in heterogeneous host populations.异质宿主群体中传染病的进化出现。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Sep 24;16(9):e2006738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006738. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Strategies to Prevent and Control the Emergence and Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Microorganisms in Hospitals. A challenge to hospital leadership.预防和控制医院中抗菌药物耐药微生物出现与传播的策略。对医院领导层的一项挑战。
JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):234-40.

引用本文的文献

1
A stochastic analysis of the interplay between antibiotic dose, mode of action, and bacterial competition in the evolution of antibiotic resistance.抗生素剂量、作用模式和细菌竞争之间相互作用的随机分析在抗生素耐药性进化中的作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 14;19(8):e1011364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011364. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
In Vitro Culture of L. in a Temporary Immersion System: Influence of Two Phytohormones on Plant Growth and Carnosol Production.迷迭香在临时浸没系统中的离体培养:两种植物激素对植物生长和鼠尾草酸产生的影响。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;14(8):747. doi: 10.3390/ph14080747.
3
Nano-Medicines a Hope for Chagas Disease!

本文引用的文献

1
Effectively Evolution-proof Antibiotics?
Trends Microbiol. 2018 Dec;26(12):969-970. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
Beyond dose: Pulsed antibiotic treatment schedules can maintain individual benefit while reducing resistance.超越剂量:脉冲抗生素治疗方案可以在降低耐药性的同时保持个体获益。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24006-w.
3
Alternative therapeutics for self-limiting infections-An indirect approach to the antibiotic resistance challenge.针对自限性感染的替代疗法——应对抗生素耐药性挑战的间接方法。
纳米药物:恰加斯病的希望!
Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Jun 1;8:655435. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.655435. eCollection 2021.
4
Nanomaterials as Novel Cardiovascular Theranostics.纳米材料作为新型心血管诊疗手段
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Mar 7;13(3):348. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13030348.
5
Nanotechnological strategies for systemic microbial infections treatment: A review.用于全身性微生物感染治疗的纳米技术策略:综述
Int J Pharm. 2020 Nov 15;589:119780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119780. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Dec 28;15(12):e2003533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003533. eCollection 2017 Dec.
4
The Search for 'Evolution-Proof' Antibiotics.寻找“进化-proof”抗生素。
Trends Microbiol. 2018 Jun;26(6):471-483. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
Phagocytes, Antibiotics, and Self-Limiting Bacterial Infections.吞噬细胞、抗生素与自限性细菌性感染。
Trends Microbiol. 2017 Nov;25(11):878-892. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
How to Use a Chemotherapeutic Agent When Resistance to It Threatens the Patient.当患者面临化疗药物耐药威胁时如何使用该化疗药物。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 9;15(2):e2001110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001110. eCollection 2017 Feb.
7
Antibiotic resistance and international travel: Causes and consequences.抗生素耐药性与国际旅行:原因与后果
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016 Nov-Dec;14(6):595-598. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
Integrating Antimicrobial Therapy with Host Immunity to Fight Drug-Resistant Infections: Classical vs. Adaptive Treatment.整合抗菌治疗与宿主免疫以对抗耐药性感染:传统治疗与适应性治疗
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 14;12(4):e1004857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004857. eCollection 2016 Apr.
9
Does High-Dose Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Prevent the Evolution of Resistance?大剂量抗菌化疗能否预防耐药性的产生?
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jan 28;12(1):e1004689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004689. eCollection 2016 Jan.
10
How competition governs whether moderate or aggressive treatment minimizes antibiotic resistance.竞争如何决定适度治疗还是积极治疗能最大程度降低抗生素耐药性。
Elife. 2015 Sep 22;4:e10559. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10559.