Suppr超能文献

中国三级助产士的核心胜任力

Essential competencies for three grades of midwives in China.

作者信息

Yin Yazhen, Li Jie, Lu Hong, Yao Jiasi, Hou Rui

机构信息

School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jan 11;5(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.12.010. eCollection 2018 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the essential competencies for different grades of midwives in China.

METHODS

A nationwide modified Delphi process was implemented to amend and screen the indicators. Thirty expert panellists including practitioners (nurse-midwives), clinical managers, academic educators and obstetricians completed a two-round Delphi study through an electronic survey that was supplemented by an expert panel meeting for discussion of comments and suggestions.

RESULTS

All panellists completed two rounds of Delphi study and at least 75% of them achieved a consensus on 224 items (1 = 0.150, 2 = 0.173). Seven domains were established, namely, 'Professional quality', 'Antenatal care', 'Intrapartum care', 'Postnatal care', 'Neonatal care', 'Gynaecological care', 'Public health care & Integrative competency'. Generalised maternal and neonatal knowledge and perinatal care skills were set for 'junior' midwives, pathological care for 'senior' ones and supervisory abilities and promotion of discipline for 'expert' ones.

CONCLUSIONS

This research developed three grades of essential competencies for midwives in China. The next step will be assessment in clinical settings for further response. The set was in line with the concepts of International Confederation of Midwives under the domestic context. This set could be adopted as a reference in developing normalised midwifery practice, education and certification.

摘要

目的

确定中国不同级别助产士的核心胜任力。

方法

实施全国范围的改良德尔菲法以修订和筛选指标。包括从业者(助产护士)、临床管理人员、学术教育工作者和产科医生在内的30名专家小组成员通过电子调查完成了两轮德尔菲研究,并辅以专家小组会议来讨论意见和建议。

结果

所有专家小组成员均完成了两轮德尔菲研究,且至少75%的成员对224项内容达成了共识(1 = 0.150,2 = 0.173)。确定了七个领域,即“专业素质”、“产前护理”、“产时护理”、“产后护理”、“新生儿护理”、“妇科护理”、“公共卫生护理与综合能力”。为“初级”助产士设定了一般孕产妇和新生儿知识及围产期护理技能,为“高级”助产士设定了病理护理内容,为“专家级”助产士设定了监督能力和学科促进内容。

结论

本研究制定了中国助产士三个级别的核心胜任力。下一步将在临床环境中进行评估以获得进一步反馈。该设定在国内背景下符合国际助产士联合会的理念。此设定可作为制定标准化助产实践、教育和认证的参考。

相似文献

1
Essential competencies for three grades of midwives in China.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jan 11;5(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.12.010. eCollection 2018 Jan 10.
3
Competencies for effective public health nutrition practice: a developing consensus.
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Aug;7(5):683-91. doi: 10.1079/PHN2003574.
4
Comparison of midwives' self-perceived essential competencies between low and high maternal mortality ratio provinces in China.
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4733-4747. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15514. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
6
The International Confederation of Midwives essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. an update study: 2009-2010.
Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 May 20.
7
Consensus on the competencies required for public health nutrition workforce development in Europe - the JobNut project.
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1439-49. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000625. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Developing core competencies for clinical nurse educators: An e-Delphi-study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105217. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105217. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
10
Essential components of midwifery ethics education: results of a Delphi study.
Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102946. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102946. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

3
Self-perceived competency of midwives in Kenya: A descriptive cross-sectional study.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022 Dec 14;14(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3477.
4
Development and validation of the Nurse's Workplace Mental Health Questionnaire.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Sep 16;9(4):521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.09.004. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Equity and efficiency of maternal and child health resources allocation in Hunan Province, China.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05185-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1129-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
2
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
4
[Content validity index in scale development].
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Feb;37(2):152-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
5
The International Confederation of Midwives essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. an update study: 2009-2010.
Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 May 20.
6
Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):490-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
7
Expert intrapartum maternity care: a meta-synthesis.
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jan;57(2):127-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04079.x.
8
Birth Territory: a theory for midwifery practice.
Women Birth. 2006 Jul;19(2):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
9
Focus-group interview and data analysis.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Nov;63(4):655-60. doi: 10.1079/pns2004399.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验