Suppr超能文献

胸大肌 II 筋膜阻滞与乳腺癌手术镇痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pectoralis-II Myofascial Block and Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (N.H., N.K., M.E.) Department of Anesthesiology, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (R.B.) Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (C.J.L.M., P.W., T. Sullivan, F.W.A.) The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio (N.K.) Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan (T. Sawyer) Department of Anesthesia, and the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (F.W.A.).

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2019 Sep;131(3):630-648. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002822.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracic paravertebral block is the preferred regional anesthetic technique for breast cancer surgery, but concerns over its invasiveness and risks have prompted search for alternatives. Pectoralis-II block is a promising analgesic technique and potential alternative to paravertebral block, but evidence of its absolute and relative effectiveness versus systemic analgesia (Control) and paravertebral block, respectively, is conflicting. This meta-analysis evaluates the analgesic effectiveness of Pectoralis-II versus Control and paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

Databases were searched for breast cancer surgery trials comparing Pectoralis-II with Control or paravertebral block. Postoperative oral morphine consumption and difference in area under curve for pooled rest pain scores more than 24 h were designated as coprimary outcomes. Opioid-related side effects, effects on long-term outcomes, such as chronic pain and opioid dependence, were also examined. Results were pooled using random-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Fourteen randomized trials (887 patients) were analyzed. Compared with Control, Pectoralis-II provided clinically important reductions in 24-h morphine consumption (at least 30.0 mg), by a weighted mean difference [95% CI] of -30.5 mg [-42.2, -18.8] (P < 0.00001), and in rest pain area under the curve more than 24 h, by -4.7cm · h [-5.1, -4.2] or -1.2cm [-1.3, -1.1] per measurement. Compared with paravertebral block, Pectoralis-II was not statistically worse (not different) for 24-h morphine consumption, and not clinically worse for rest pain area under curve more than 24 h. No differences were observed in opioid-related side effects or any other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that Pectoralis-II reduces pain intensity and morphine consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively when compared with systemic analgesia alone; and it also offers analgesic benefits noninferior to those of paravertebral block after breast cancer surgery. Evidence supports incorporating Pectoralis-II into multimodal analgesia and also using it as a paravertebral block alternative in this population.

摘要

背景

胸椎旁阻滞是乳腺癌手术首选的区域麻醉技术,但由于其有创性和风险,人们开始寻找替代方法。胸大肌 II 阻滞是一种有前途的镇痛技术,可能是椎旁阻滞的替代方法,但关于其与全身镇痛(对照)和椎旁阻滞相比的绝对和相对有效性的证据存在冲突。本荟萃分析评估了胸大肌 II 阻滞与对照和椎旁阻滞在乳腺癌手术中的镇痛效果。

方法

检索了比较胸大肌 II 阻滞与对照或椎旁阻滞的乳腺癌手术试验数据库。术后口服吗啡消耗量和 24 小时以上静息痛曲线下面积差值被指定为主要结局。还检查了阿片类药物相关的副作用,以及对长期结果的影响,如慢性疼痛和阿片类药物依赖。结果使用随机效应模型进行汇总。

结果

分析了 14 项随机试验(887 例患者)。与对照组相比,胸大肌 II 阻滞可显著减少 24 小时吗啡消耗量(至少 30.0mg),加权均数差值[95%置信区间]为-30.5mg[-42.2,-18.8](P<0.00001),24 小时以上静息痛曲线下面积差值为-4.7cm·h[-5.1,-4.2]或-1.2cm[-1.3,-1.1]。与椎旁阻滞相比,胸大肌 II 阻滞在 24 小时吗啡消耗量方面没有统计学差异,在 24 小时以上静息痛曲线下面积方面也没有临床差异。在阿片类药物相关副作用或其他任何结局方面均未观察到差异。

结论

我们发现,与单独全身镇痛相比,胸大肌 II 阻滞可降低术后前 24 小时的疼痛强度和吗啡消耗量;并且在乳腺癌手术后,它也提供了与椎旁阻滞相当的镇痛效果。证据支持将胸大肌 II 阻滞纳入多模式镇痛,并在该人群中作为椎旁阻滞的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验