• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳美芬对吗啡所致呼吸抑制的拮抗作用。

Antagonism of morphine-induced respiratory depression with nalmefene.

作者信息

Konieczko K M, Jones J G, Barrowcliffe M P, Jordan C, Altman D G

机构信息

Division of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middx.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1988 Sep;61(3):318-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.3.318.

DOI:10.1093/bja/61.3.318
PMID:3140862
Abstract

The duration of respiratory depression induced by morphine 10 mg/70 kg was studied following the administration of one of two opioid antagonists. Respiratory measurements included: (i) the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide, described in two ways--the minute ventilation at an end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure of 8 kPa (VE8) and the log slope of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide; (ii) resting end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure; (iii) rate of ventilation. One hour after administration of morphine, one of the following was given i.v.: nalmefene 0.4 mg/70 kg; naloxone 0.4 mg/70 kg (low dose); naloxone 1.6 mg/70 kg (high dose); or saline placebo. The depression of VE8 by morphine was antagonized by all three treatments for the 1.5 h after the injection. However, for the 1.5-6 h after antagonist, VE8 following naloxone became depressed, whereas VE8 after nalmefene remained significantly increased compared with other treatments. Nalmefene restored the slope of the ventilatory response to baseline for 6 h and differed significantly from low but not high dose naloxone. Resting end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements demonstrated that nalmefene activity exceeded that of low but not high dose naloxone over the 1.5-4.5 h period. Rate of ventilation was not different between treatments.

摘要

在给予两种阿片类拮抗剂之一后,研究了10mg/70kg吗啡诱导的呼吸抑制持续时间。呼吸测量包括:(i)对二氧化碳的通气反应,用两种方式描述——呼气末二氧化碳分压为8kPa时的分钟通气量(VE8)以及对二氧化碳通气反应的对数斜率;(ii)静息呼气末二氧化碳分压;(iii)通气频率。给予吗啡1小时后,静脉注射以下药物之一:纳美芬0.4mg/70kg;纳洛酮0.4mg/70kg(低剂量);纳洛酮1.6mg/70kg(高剂量);或生理盐水安慰剂。注射后1.5小时内,所有三种治疗均拮抗了吗啡对VE8的抑制作用。然而,在给予拮抗剂后的1.5 - 6小时内,纳洛酮后的VE8出现下降,而与其他治疗相比,纳美芬后的VE8仍显著升高。纳美芬在6小时内将通气反应斜率恢复至基线,且与低剂量但非高剂量纳洛酮有显著差异。静息呼气末二氧化碳测量结果表明,在1.5 - 4.5小时期间,纳美芬的活性超过低剂量但不超过高剂量纳洛酮。各治疗组之间的通气频率无差异。

相似文献

1
Antagonism of morphine-induced respiratory depression with nalmefene.纳美芬对吗啡所致呼吸抑制的拮抗作用。
Br J Anaesth. 1988 Sep;61(3):318-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.3.318.
2
Efficacy of methylnaltrexone versus naloxone for reversal of morphine-induced depression of hypoxic ventilatory response.甲基纳曲酮与纳洛酮对吗啡诱导的低氧通气反应抑制的逆转效果比较
Anesth Analg. 1994 Apr;78(4):701-5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199404000-00015.
3
Prevention of late fentanyl-induced respiratory depression after the injection of opiate antagonists naltrexone and S-20682: comparison with naloxone.注射阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮和S-20682后预防芬太尼所致迟发性呼吸抑制:与纳洛酮的比较
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Jan;55(1):71-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.1.71.
4
In vivo characterization of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in mice.在体研究纳曲酮在小鼠体内的特性。
Life Sci. 2010 Apr 10;86(15-16):624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Feb 14.
5
Duration of opioid antagonism by nalmefene and naloxone in the dog. A nonparametric pharmacodynamic comparison based on generalized cross-validated spline estimation.纳美芬和纳洛酮对犬类阿片类药物拮抗作用的持续时间。基于广义交叉验证样条估计的非参数药效学比较。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Oct;33(10):540-5.
6
Reversal of Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Intranasal Nalmefene and Intranasal Naloxone.健康志愿者中阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制的逆转:鼻内纳美芬与鼻内纳洛酮的比较。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul;64(7):828-839. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2421. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
7
Comparison of potency and duration of action of nalmefene and naloxone.
Anesth Analg. 1994 Mar;78(3):536-41. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199403000-00021.
8
The 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist mosapride does not antagonize morphine-induced respiratory depression.5-羟色胺4受体激动剂莫沙必利不能拮抗吗啡引起的呼吸抑制。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Sep;78(3):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.05.010.
9
Comparison of the duration of action of nalmefene and naloxone on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of the rhesus monkey.纳美芬和纳洛酮对恒河猴下丘脑-垂体轴作用持续时间的比较。
Neuroendocrinology. 1989 Mar;49(3):275-80. doi: 10.1159/000125128.
10
Role of endogenous opioids on ventilation and chemical control of breathing in pentobarbitone-anesthetized rats.
Pharmacology. 1987;35(6):317-26. doi: 10.1159/000138356.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Course of Reversal of Fentanyl-Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Subjects by Intramuscular Nalmefene and Intramuscular and Intranasal Naloxone.健康受试者中,肌肉注射纳美芬以及肌肉注射和鼻内注射纳洛酮对芬太尼所致呼吸抑制的逆转时间进程。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;65(2):206-216. doi: 10.1002/jcph.6132. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Synthetic opioids have disrupted conventional wisdom for treating opioid overdose.合成阿片类药物打破了治疗阿片类药物过量的传统观念。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Aug 13;12:100268. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100268. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Pharmacokinetic Properties of an FDA-approved Intranasal Nalmefene Formulation for the Treatment of Opioid Overdose.
一种经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的用于治疗阿片类药物过量的鼻腔内纳美芬制剂的药代动力学特性。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2024 Jan;13(1):58-69. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1312. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Treatment of opioid overdose: current approaches and recent advances.阿片类药物过量治疗:当前方法和最新进展。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Jul;239(7):2063-2081. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06125-5. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Fatal overdoses involving hydromorphone and morphine among inpatients: a case series.住院患者中涉及氢吗啡酮和吗啡的致命过量用药:病例系列
CMAJ Open. 2017 Mar 2;5(1):E184-E189. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160013. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
6
Illicit opioid intoxication: diagnosis and treatment.非法阿片类药物中毒:诊断与治疗
Subst Abuse. 2011;5:17-25. doi: 10.4137/SART.S7090. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
7
Respiratory depression following morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in normal subjects.正常受试者使用吗啡及吗啡 -6- 葡萄糖醛酸苷后的呼吸抑制。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Aug;40(2):145-52.