University of California, Berkeley.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Dec 1;44(6):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7785787.
Political partisanship can influence whether individuals enroll in government programs. In particular, Republicans, ceteris paribus, are less likely to enroll in Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual marketplace insurance than Democrats. The logic of adverse selection suggests low uptake among Republicans would generally put upward pressure on marketplace premiums, especially in geographic areas with more Republican partisans.
Using data from Healthcare.gov at the rating area level, this article examines the association between Republican vote share and growth in ACA marketplace premiums, being careful to account for potential confounding variables.
Insurers have increased marketplace premiums at higher rates in areas with more Republican voters. In the preferred model specification, a 10-percentage-point difference in Republican vote share is associated with a 3.2-percentage-point increase in average premium growth for a standard plan. A variety of robustness and placebo checks suggest the relationship is driven by partisanship.
Partisan polarization can threaten the successful implementation of policies that rely on high levels of citizen participation.
政治党派立场可能会影响个人是否参加政府项目。具体而言,共和党人(在其他条件相同的情况下)比民主党人更不可能参加《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的个人医疗保险市场。逆向选择的逻辑表明,共和党人参保率低通常会给市场保费带来上行压力,尤其是在共和党人较多的地区。
本文利用 Healthcare.gov 在评级区域层面的数据,研究了共和党选票份额与 ACA 市场保费增长之间的关系,同时谨慎考虑了潜在的混杂变量。
在共和党选民较多的地区,保险公司以更高的速度提高了市场保费。在首选的模型规范中,共和党选票份额相差 10 个百分点,与标准计划的平均保费增长率增加 3.2 个百分点相关。各种稳健性和安慰剂检查表明,这种关系是由党派立场驱动的。
党派极化可能会威胁到依赖高公民参与度的政策的成功实施。