San Raffaele Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy;
Department of Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Clin Chem. 2019 Sep;65(9):1141-1152. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.304196. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
The Islet Autoantibody Standardization Program (IASP) aims to improve the performance of immunoassays measuring type 1 diabetes (T1D)-associated autoantibodies and the concordance of results among laboratories. IASP organizes international interlaboratory assay comparison studies in which blinded serum samples are distributed to participating laboratories, followed by centralized collection and analysis of results, providing participants with an unbiased comparative assessment. In this report, we describe the results of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA) assays presented in the IASP 2018 workshop.
In May 2018, IASP distributed to participants uniquely coded sera from 43 new-onset T1D patients, 7 multiple autoantibody-positive nondiabetic individuals, and 90 blood donors. Results were analyzed for the following metrics: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC), partial ROC-AUC at 95% specificity (pAUC95), and concordance of qualitative and quantitative results.
Thirty-seven laboratories submitted results from a total of 48 different GADA assays adopting 9 different formats. The median ROC-AUC and pAUC95 of all assays were 0.87 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.83-0.89] and 0.036 (IQR, 0.032-0.039), respectively. Large differences in pAUC95 (range, 0.001-0.0411) were observed across assays. Of formats widely adopted, bridge ELISAs showed the best median pAUC95 (0.039; range, 0.036-0.041).
Several novel assay formats submitted to this study showed heterogeneous performance. In 2018, the majority of the best performing GADA immunoassays consisted of novel or established nonradioactive tests that proved on a par or superior to the radiobinding assay, the previous gold standard assay format for GADA measurement.
胰岛自身抗体标准化项目(IASP)旨在提高测量 1 型糖尿病(T1D)相关自身抗体的免疫分析性能和实验室间结果的一致性。IASP 组织国际实验室间检测比较研究,将盲法血清样本分发给参与实验室,然后集中收集和分析结果,为参与者提供无偏倚的比较评估。在本报告中,我们描述了 2018 年 IASP 研讨会中谷氨酸脱羧酶自身抗体(GADA)检测的结果。
2018 年 5 月,IASP 将 43 名新诊断的 T1D 患者、7 名多自身抗体阳性的非糖尿病个体和 90 名献血者的唯一编码血清分发给参与者。对以下指标进行了分析:敏感性、特异性、准确性、ROC 曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)、95%特异性时的部分 ROC-AUC(pAUC95)和定性与定量结果的一致性。
37 个实验室提交了总共 48 种不同的 GADA 检测方法的结果,采用了 9 种不同的格式。所有检测的中位数 ROC-AUC 和 pAUC95 分别为 0.87(四分位距(IQR),0.83-0.89)和 0.036(IQR,0.032-0.039)。不同检测之间的 pAUC95 差异很大(范围,0.001-0.0411)。在广泛采用的格式中,桥梁 ELISA 显示出最佳的中位数 pAUC95(0.039;范围,0.036-0.041)。
本研究提交的几种新的检测方法表现出异质性。在 2018 年,大多数表现最好的 GADA 免疫分析采用的是新型或已建立的非放射性检测方法,这些方法与放射结合检测相当或优于放射结合检测,放射结合检测是以前 GADA 测量的金标准检测方法。