Elbagir Sahwa, Elshafie Amir I, Elagib Elnour M, Mohammed NasrEldeen A, Aledrissy Mawahib I E, Sohrabian Azita, Nur Musa A M, Svenungsson Elisabet, Gunnarsson Iva, Rönnelid Johan
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rheumatology Unit, Military Hospital, Omdurman, Sudan.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 May 1;59(5):968-978. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez323.
SLE is known to have an aggressive phenotype in black populations, but data from African cohorts are largely lacking. We therefore compared immunological and clinical profiles between Sudanese and Swedish patients using similar tools.
Consecutive SLE patients from Sudan (n = 115) and Sweden (n = 340) and from 106 Sudanese and 318 Swedish age- and sex-matched controls were included. All patients fulfilled the 1982 ACR classification criteria for SLE. Ten ANA-associated specificities and C1q-binding immune complexes (CICs) were measured. Cut-offs were established based on Sudanese and Swedish controls, respectively. Disease activity was measured with a modified SLEDAI and organ damage with the SLICC Damage Index. In a nested case-control design, Swedish and Sudanese patients were matched for age and disease duration.
Females constituted 95.6% and 88.1% of Sudanese and Swedish patients, respectively (P = 0.02), with younger age at inclusion (33 vs 47.7 years; P < 0.0001) and shorter disease duration (5 vs 14 years; P < 0.0001) among Sudanese patients. Anti-Sm antibodies were more frequent in Sudanese patients, whereas anti-dsDNA, anti-histone and CICs were higher in Swedish patients. In the matched analyses, there was a trend for higher SLEDAI among Swedes. However, Sudanese patients had more damage, solely attributed to high frequencies of cranial/peripheral neuropathy and diabetes.
While anti-Sm is more common in Sudan than in Sweden, the opposite is found for anti-dsDNA. Sudanese patients had higher damage scores, mainly because of neuropathy and diabetes. Sudanese patients were younger, with a shorter SLE duration, possibly indicating a more severe disease course with impact on survival rates.
已知系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)在黑人人群中具有侵袭性表型,但非洲队列的数据大多缺乏。因此,我们使用类似工具比较了苏丹和瑞典患者的免疫学和临床特征。
纳入了来自苏丹(n = 115)和瑞典(n = 340)的连续SLE患者,以及106名苏丹和318名瑞典年龄及性别匹配的对照。所有患者均符合1982年美国风湿病学会(ACR)SLE分类标准。检测了10种抗核抗体(ANA)相关特异性和C1q结合免疫复合物(CIC)。分别根据苏丹和瑞典对照确定临界值。用改良的SLE疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)测量疾病活动度,用系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床(SLICC)损伤指数测量器官损伤。在巢式病例对照设计中,对瑞典和苏丹患者按年龄和病程进行匹配。
女性分别占苏丹和瑞典患者的95.6%和88.1%(P = 0.02),苏丹患者纳入时年龄更小(33岁对47.7岁;P < 0.0001),病程更短(5年对14年;P < 0.0001)。抗Sm抗体在苏丹患者中更常见,而抗双链DNA(dsDNA)、抗组蛋白和CIC在瑞典患者中更高。在匹配分析中,瑞典人中有SLEDAI更高的趋势。然而,苏丹患者有更多损伤,这完全归因于颅神经/周围神经病变和糖尿病的高发生率。
虽然抗Sm在苏丹比在瑞典更常见,但抗dsDNA的情况则相反。苏丹患者的损伤评分更高,主要是因为神经病变和糖尿病。苏丹患者更年轻,SLE病程更短,这可能表明疾病进程更严重,对生存率有影响。