Suppr超能文献

肥厚型心肌病患者左心室壁厚度增加导致的纵向应变在各厂家间的区域性差异。

Regional Variability in Longitudinal Strain Across Vendors in Patients With Cardiomyopathy Due to Increased Left Ventricular Wall Thickness.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (B.W.S., K.S., D.P., R.G., M.Y.D., M.H., W.A.J., Z.B.P).

Mid America Heart Institute, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO (B.W.S.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8):e008973. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.008973. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiomyopathies with increased left ventricular wall thickness such as cardiac amyloidosis, septal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and apical HCM exhibit characteristic regional longitudinal strain (LS) patterns. However, between-vendor agreement of segmental and regional LS has not been tested in these diseases. We sought to assess LS values among vendors in specific cardiomyopathies that exhibit regional strain variation: cardiac amyloidosis, septal HCM, and apical HCM.

METHODS

This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of 69 patients (18 amyloidosis, 30 septal HCM, 6 apical HCM, and 15 controls) who underwent clinically indicated outpatient echocardiography at the Cleveland Clinic. Peak systolic segmental, regional (basal, mid, and apical), and global LS were evaluated using GE (EchoPAC), Siemens (Velocity Vector Imaging), and Phillips (QLab) systems in the same imaging session. Between-vendor, differences were analyzed using correlation coefficients, Bland Altman plots, and a mixed model.

RESULTS

Global LS was highly correlated among the 3 software packages and most abnormal in patients with amyloidosis (P<0.001). Regional LS analysis demonstrated that QLab software tended to produce more negative LS values, driven by differences in apical strains. EchoPAC had the greatest ability to discriminate patients with amyloidosis using regional strain values (area under the curve, 0.932) as compared with Velocity Vector Imaging and QLab (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Global and regional variations in LS exist between-vendors in patients with cardiomyopathies with increased left ventricular wall thickness (amyloidosis, septal HCM, and apical HCM). It is important to be aware of these differences for diagnosis, prognosis, and serial examinations in these conditions.

摘要

背景

左心室壁增厚型心肌病,如心脏淀粉样变性、间隔肥厚型心肌病(HCM)和心尖肥厚型心肌病,表现出特征性的局部纵向应变(LS)模式。然而,在这些疾病中,尚未对节段和局部 LS 的不同供应商之间的一致性进行测试。我们旨在评估在具有区域应变差异的特定心肌病(心脏淀粉样变性、间隔 HCM 和心尖 HCM)中不同供应商之间的 LS 值。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、横断面研究,纳入了在克利夫兰诊所接受临床指征明确的门诊超声心动图检查的 69 名患者(18 名淀粉样变性患者、30 名间隔 HCM 患者、6 名心尖 HCM 患者和 15 名对照者)。使用 GE(EchoPAC)、西门子(Velocity Vector Imaging)和飞利浦(QLab)系统在同一次成像检查中评估峰值收缩节段、局部(基底、中部和心尖)和整体 LS。使用相关系数、Bland-Altman 图和混合模型分析供应商之间的差异。

结果

在 3 种软件包中,整体 LS 高度相关,淀粉样变性患者的 LS 最异常(P<0.001)。局部 LS 分析表明,QLab 软件产生的 LS 值更负,这主要是由于心尖应变的差异所致。与 Velocity Vector Imaging 和 QLab 相比,EchoPAC 具有使用局部应变值区分淀粉样变性患者的最大能力(曲线下面积,0.932;P<0.001)。

结论

在左心室壁增厚型心肌病(淀粉样变性、间隔 HCM 和心尖 HCM)患者中,LS 在不同供应商之间存在整体和局部差异。在这些情况下,了解这些差异对于诊断、预后和连续检查很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验