Department of Psychology.
Emotion. 2020 Dec;20(8):1344-1356. doi: 10.1037/emo0000655. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
Past research has suggested that one problematic limitation of compassion is its seeming resistance to increase in response to growing numbers of targets in distress. This insensitivity to numeracy results in the dampening of compassion when faced with mass suffering. Given that emerging evidence suggests that facing past adversity in life may foster compassion and a general prosocial orientation, we explored whether those who have experienced greater adversity show a resistance to this numeracy bias. In a series of 4 experiments, we demonstrate not only that those who have experienced greater adversity readily overcome the numeracy bias in compassion, but also that beliefs regarding their ability to be efficacious in helping others underlie this link. Of import, we also show that direct manipulation of such efficacy beliefs can remove the numeracy bias in compassion typically found among those who have not endured significant life adversity. Finally, we explore the ability of adversity to engender prosocial donations to those in need via mechanisms involving compassion and efficacy beliefs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
过去的研究表明,同情的一个有问题的局限性似乎是,它对越来越多的困境目标的反应似乎没有增加。这种对数值的不敏感导致在面对大量苦难时,同情心减弱。鉴于新出现的证据表明,面对生活中的逆境可能会培养同情心和普遍的亲社会倾向,我们探讨了那些经历过更多逆境的人是否表现出对这种数值偏见的抵制。在一系列的 4 项实验中,我们不仅证明了那些经历过更多逆境的人很容易克服同情中的数值偏见,而且还证明了他们对自己帮助他人能力的信念是这种联系的基础。重要的是,我们还表明,直接操纵这种效能信念可以消除那些没有经历过重大生活逆境的人通常在同情中发现的数值偏见。最后,我们通过涉及同情和效能信念的机制,探讨了逆境通过何种机制引发对有需要的人的亲社会捐赠。