Cho Isu, Cunningham Tony J, Daley Ryan T, Kensinger Elizabeth A, Gutchess Angela
Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Center for Sleep and Cognition, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol. 2023;4:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100105. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
Recently, there has been increasing attention to the interaction between empathy and memory. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period when empathy played a key role in people's behaviors, we assessed the relationship between empathy and memory. In this pre-registered report, we used memory accuracy for the number of COVID-19 cases as a measure of recent memory and examined its relationship with trait empathy. Moreover, we investigated whether cognitive vs. affective empathy differently associate with one's memory for the number of COVID-19 cases, given evidence for distinct mechanisms for the two aspects of empathy. Finally, we assessed how age is related to empathy-memory associations. To address these questions, we used the Boston College COVID-19 Dataset, which included surveys assessing dispositional empathy and memory for the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases during the first wave of the pandemic. Empathy was not associated with memory accuracy for the confirmed cases when using an empathy measure that combined both cognitive and affective empathy. However, when using a measure that separately assessed cognitive and affective empathy, only affective empathy, specifically the personal distress subscale, was associated with greater memory accuracy. There was no age-related difference in memory accuracy despite age-related decreases in affective empathy. Results suggest that individuals with greater affective empathy (i.e., greater tendency to feel discomfort by the suffering of others) can have more accurate memory for details of an ongoing empathy-evoking situation. Findings are discussed in the context of motivation and emotional arousal. The current study provides ecological evidence to corroborate the interplay of empathy and memory.
最近,共情与记忆之间的相互作用受到了越来越多的关注。在新冠疫情期间,共情在人们的行为中发挥了关键作用,我们评估了共情与记忆之间的关系。在这份预先注册的报告中,我们将对新冠病例数量的记忆准确性作为近期记忆的一种衡量指标,并研究了它与特质共情之间的关系。此外,鉴于有证据表明共情的认知和情感两个方面存在不同的机制,我们调查了认知共情与情感共情对一个人对新冠病例数量的记忆的影响是否不同。最后,我们评估了年龄与共情-记忆关联之间的关系。为了解决这些问题,我们使用了波士顿学院新冠数据集,其中包括在疫情第一波期间评估特质共情和对确诊新冠病例数量的记忆的调查。当使用结合了认知共情和情感共情的共情测量方法时,共情与确诊病例的记忆准确性无关。然而,当使用分别评估认知共情和情感共情的测量方法时,只有情感共情,特别是个人痛苦子量表,与更高的记忆准确性相关。尽管情感共情会随着年龄增长而下降,但记忆准确性并没有与年龄相关的差异。结果表明,具有更强情感共情能力的个体(即更容易因他人的痛苦而感到不适的人)对正在发生的引发共情的情境细节可能有更准确的记忆。我们在动机和情绪唤醒的背景下讨论了这些发现。本研究提供了生态学证据来证实共情与记忆之间的相互作用。