• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证和比较两种糖尿病患者 30 天再入院预测模型。

VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF TWO 30-DAY RE-ADMISSION PREDICTION MODELS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2019 Nov;25(11):1151-1157. doi: 10.4158/EP-2019-0125. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

DOI:10.4158/EP-2019-0125
PMID:31414904
Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the 30-day re-admission predictive performance of the HOSPITAL score and Diabetes Early Re-admission Risk Indicator (DERRI) in hospitalized diabetes patients. This was a case-control study in an academic, tertiary center in the United States. Adult hospitalized diabetes patients were randomly identified between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017. Patients were categorized into two groups: () re-admitted within 30 days, and () not re-admitted within 30 days. Predictive performance of the HOSPITAL and DERRI scores was evaluated by calculating receiver operating characteristics curves (c-statistic), Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests, and Brier scores. A total of 200 patients were included (100 re-admitted, 100 non-re-admitted). The HOSPITAL score had a c-statistic of 0.731 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.661 to 0.800), Hosmer-Lemeshow test = .211, and Brier score 0.212. The DERRI score had a c-statistic of 0.796 (95% CI, 0.734 to 0.857), Hosmer-Lemeshow test = .114, and Brier score 0.212. The difference in receiver operating characteristic curves was not statistically significant between the two scores but showed a higher c-statistic with the DERRI score ( = .055). Both HOSPITAL and DERRI scores showed good predictive performance in 30-day re-admission of adult hospitalized diabetes patients. There was no significant difference in discrimination and calibration between the scores. = confidence interval; = Diabetes Early Re-admission Risk Indicator; = interquartile range.

摘要

目的在于评估 HOSPITAL 评分和糖尿病早期再入院风险指标(DERRI)在住院糖尿病患者中 30 天再入院的预测性能。这是在美国一家学术性三级中心进行的病例对照研究。2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日期间,随机确定住院的糖尿病患者。将患者分为两组:()在 30 天内再入院,()在 30 天内未再入院。通过计算接收者操作特征曲线(c 统计量)、Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验和 Brier 评分来评估 HOSPITAL 和 DERRI 评分的预测性能。共纳入 200 例患者(100 例再入院,100 例未再入院)。HOSPITAL 评分的 c 统计量为 0.731(95%置信区间 [CI],0.661 至 0.800),Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 =.211,Brier 评分 0.212。DERRI 评分的 c 统计量为 0.796(95%CI,0.734 至 0.857),Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 =.114,Brier 评分 0.212。两个评分之间的接收者操作特征曲线差异无统计学意义,但 DERRI 评分的 c 统计量较高( =.055)。HOSPITAL 和 DERRI 评分均能较好地预测成年住院糖尿病患者的 30 天再入院。评分之间的区分度和校准度无显著差异。95%CI = 置信区间;DERRI = 糖尿病早期再入院风险指标;IQR = 四分位距。

相似文献

1
VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF TWO 30-DAY RE-ADMISSION PREDICTION MODELS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES.验证和比较两种糖尿病患者 30 天再入院预测模型。
Endocr Pract. 2019 Nov;25(11):1151-1157. doi: 10.4158/EP-2019-0125. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
2
EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF THE DIABETES EARLY RE-ADMISSION RISK INDICATOR (DERRI).糖尿病再入院风险指标(DERRI)的外部验证。
Endocr Pract. 2018 Jun;24(6):527-541. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0035. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NOVEL TOOL TO PREDICT HOSPITAL READMISSION RISK AMONG PATIENTS WITH DIABETES.开发并验证一种新型工具,以预测糖尿病患者的住院再入院风险。
Endocr Pract. 2016 Oct;22(10):1204-1215. doi: 10.4158/E161391.OR.
4
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
5
Does EuroSCORE predict length of stay and specific postoperative complications after cardiac surgery?欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)能否预测心脏手术后的住院时间及特定术后并发症?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jan;27(1):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.020.
6
Do interventions in an ICU affect the predictive ability of pediatric index of mortality and pediatric index of mortality-2 scores in a tertiary care hospital?在一家三级医院中, ICU 中的干预措施是否会影响儿科死亡率指数和儿科死亡率-2 评分的预测能力?
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):e70-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31827127cd.
7
Accuracy of a composite score using daily SAPS II and LOD scores for predicting hospital mortality in ICU patients hospitalized for more than 72 h.使用每日序贯器官衰竭评估(SAPS)II 评分和住院死亡概率(LOD)评分的综合评分预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)超过72小时患者医院死亡率的准确性。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s001340100961.
8
Development and Performance of Electronic Pediatric Risk of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 Automated Acuity Scores.电子儿童死亡风险和儿科逻辑器官功能障碍-2 自动评估分数的制定和性能。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):e372-e379. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001998.
9
Validation of trauma and injury severity score in blunt trauma patients by using a Canadian trauma registry.通过加拿大创伤登记处对钝性创伤患者的创伤和损伤严重程度评分进行验证。
J Trauma. 1996 May;40(5):733-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199605000-00008.
10
Evaluation of IScore validity in a Greek cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes.评价 IScore 在希腊 2 型糖尿病患者队列中的有效性。
BMC Neurol. 2013 Sep 16;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-121.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning vs Traditional Models for Predicting Hospital Readmission among Patients with Diabetes.深度学习与传统模型在预测糖尿病患者住院再入院中的比较。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:512-521. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting and Preventing Acute Care Re-Utilization by Patients with Diabetes.预测和预防糖尿病患者急性护理再利用。
Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Sep 4;21(9):34. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01402-7.
3
Patient Understanding of Discharge Instructions for Home Diabetes Self-Management and Risk for Hospital Readmission and Emergency Department Visits.
患者对家庭糖尿病自我管理出院指导的理解与医院再入院和急诊就诊风险的关系。
Endocr Pract. 2021 Jun;27(6):561-566. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Apr 6.