Department of Emergency Medicine.
Department of Neurology.
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Sep;40(8):e830-e838. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002338.
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common cause of acute dizziness. Strong evidence exists for diagnosing BPPV using the Dix-Hallpike Test (DHT) and treating it with the canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM). Despite this, both are infrequently used in the emergency department (ED).
As an early method to evaluate a BPPV-focused educational intervention, we evaluated whether an educational intervention improved ED provider performance on hypothetical stroke and BPPV cases delivered by vignette.
A randomized, controlled, educational intervention study in ED physicians. The intervention aimed to promote the appropriate use of the DHT and CRM. A BPPV vignette, a stroke-dizziness (safety) vignette, and vignette scoring schemes (higher scores indicating more optimal care) used previously established vignette methodology.
We recruited participants at the exhibitor hall of an emergency medicine annual meeting.
We recruited 48 emergency physicians. All were board certified or residency trained and board eligible. All were engaged in the active practice of emergency medicine. None were trainees.
Intervention group: a narrated, educational presentation by computer followed by the clinical vignettes.
Received no educational intervention and completed the clinical vignettes-intended to mirror current clinician practice.
Primary endpoint: total score (out of 200 points) on a vignette-based scoring instrument assessing the performance of history, physical, and diagnostic testing on hypothetical stroke and BPPV cases.
The efficacy threshold was crossed at the interim analysis. The intervention group had higher performance scores compared with controls (113.2 versus 68.6, p < 0.00001). BPPV and safety subscores were both significantly higher in the intervention group. Sixty-two percent of the intervention group planned to use the DHT versus 29% of controls. After the vignette described characteristic BPPV nystagmus, 100% of the intervention group planned to use the CRM versus 17% of controls.
The educational intervention increased provider performance in dizziness vignettes, including more frequent appropriate use of the DHT/CRM. These findings indicate the intervention positively influenced planned behavior. Future work is needed to implement and evaluate this intervention in clinical practice.
良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)是急性头晕的常见原因。使用 Dix-Hallpike 测试(DHT)诊断 BPPV 和使用管结石复位手法(CRM)治疗 BPPV 均有强有力的证据支持。尽管如此,这两种方法在急诊科(ED)中都很少使用。
作为评估以 BPPV 为重点的教育干预的早期方法,我们评估了教育干预是否会提高 ED 医生对通过情景模拟呈现的假设性中风和 BPPV 病例的表现。
一项 ED 医生的随机、对照、教育干预研究。该干预旨在促进 DHT 和 CRM 的合理使用。我们使用先前建立的情景模拟方法,引入了 BPPV 情景模拟、中风-头晕(安全性)情景模拟以及情景模拟评分方案(得分越高表示护理越理想)。
我们在急诊医学年会的展览厅招募参与者。
我们招募了 48 名急诊医生。所有医生均为董事会认证或住院医师培训合格,并具备董事会资格。所有医生均从事急诊医学的实际工作。没有培训生。
干预组:通过计算机呈现旁白式教育演示,然后进行临床情景模拟。
未接受教育干预,仅完成临床情景模拟-旨在模拟当前临床医生的实践。
主要终点:基于情景模拟的评分工具对假设性中风和 BPPV 病例的病史、体格检查和诊断测试表现的总得分(满分 200 分)。
中期分析时达到了疗效阈值。干预组的表现评分高于对照组(113.2 分比 68.6 分,p<0.00001)。干预组的 BPPV 和安全性亚评分均显著更高。62%的干预组计划使用 DHT,而对照组为 29%。情景模拟描述了典型的 BPPV 眼震后,100%的干预组计划使用 CRM,而对照组为 17%。
教育干预提高了医生在头晕情景模拟中的表现,包括更频繁地适当使用 DHT/CRM。这些发现表明,干预措施对计划行为产生了积极影响。未来需要在临床实践中实施和评估这种干预。