Suppr超能文献

老年及高龄弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的治疗方法——非R-CHOP替代疗法的应用以及合并症对治疗选择和预后的影响:一项基于Humedica数据库的2007 - 2015年回顾性队列分析

Treatment approaches for older and oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - Use of non-R-CHOP alternative therapies and impact of comorbidities on treatment choices and outcome: A Humedica database retrospective cohort analysis, 2007-2015.

作者信息

Morrison Vicki A, Hamilton Laurie, Ogbonnaya Augustina, Raju Aditya, Hennenfent Kristin, Galaznik Aaron

机构信息

Hematology/Oncology, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, 715 8th St, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.

Xcenda LLC, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Suite 500, Palm Harbor, FL 34685, USA.

出版信息

J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Jan;11(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We characterized real-world treatment patterns in older (65-74 years) and oldest (75-85 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving initial therapy (R-CHOP, non-R-CHOP regimens). Impact of comorbidities on treatment choice, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) were assessed by age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Humedica database, we identified 1436 newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who received frontline therapy from 1/07-9/15. The 885 patients ≥65 years of age were further evaluated for baseline demographics, comorbidities, initial therapy, and PFS/OS.

RESULTS

Of 885 patients, 406 (45.9%) were age 65-74, and 479 (54.1%) age 75-85, years. First line therapy was R-CHOP (61.8%) or non-R-CHOP (38.2%). Although Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were similar at baseline, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were more common in those receiving non-R-CHOP regimens. Survival outcomes were superior for those receiving initial R-CHOP, versus non-R-CHOP, therapy (median PFS 53.9 versus 27.8 months; two-year PFS 71.2% versus 51.6%, p < .0001; median OS not reached versus 45 months; two-year OS 81.3% versus 62.9%, p < .0001, respectively). Only 10.4% (R-CHOP) and 12.1% (non-R-CHOP) of patients received second line therapies. Two-year OS by age (65-74, 75-85 years) was 66.4% and 39.1%, respectively with R-CHOP (p = .0045), and 74.3% and 54.5%, respectively with non-R-CHOP (p = .004), therapy. Age ≥ 75 years and CCI of 2+ were associated with shorter OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified real-world first line treatment patterns for older patients with DLBCL. Our findings support the feasibility of administering standard R-CHOP therapy, even to oldest patients with DLBCL.

摘要

引言

我们对接受初始治疗(R-CHOP、非R-CHOP方案)的老年(65 - 74岁)和高龄(75 - 85岁)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的真实治疗模式进行了特征分析。按年龄评估了合并症对治疗选择以及总生存期和无进展生存期(OS、PFS)的影响。

患者与方法

利用Humedica数据库,我们确定了1436例2007年1月至2015年9月期间接受一线治疗的新诊断DLBCL患者。对885例年龄≥65岁的患者进一步评估其基线人口统计学特征、合并症、初始治疗以及PFS/OS。

结果

885例患者中,406例(45.9%)年龄在65 - 74岁,479例(54.1%)年龄在75 - 85岁。一线治疗为R-CHOP方案(61.8%)或非R-CHOP方案(38.2%)。尽管基线时查尔森合并症指数(CCI)评分相似,但充血性心力衰竭和心肌梗死在接受非R-CHOP方案治疗的患者中更为常见。接受初始R-CHOP治疗的患者的生存结局优于接受非R-CHOP治疗的患者(中位PFS分别为53.9个月和27.8个月;两年PFS分别为71.2%和51.6%,p <.0001;中位OS未达到和45个月;两年OS分别为81.3%和62.9%,p <.0001)。仅10.4%(R-CHOP)和12.1%(非R-CHOP)的患者接受了二线治疗。采用R-CHOP方案治疗时,按年龄(65 - 74岁、75 - 85岁)划分的两年OS分别为66.4%和39.1%(p = 0.0045),采用非R-CHOP方案治疗时分别为74.3%和54.5%(p = 0.004)。年龄≥75岁且CCI为2分及以上与较短的OS和PFS相关。

结论

本研究确定了老年DLBCL患者的真实一线治疗模式。我们的研究结果支持对高龄DLBCL患者实施标准R-CHOP治疗的可行性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验