• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物防治菌株差异性地改变了……的本土土壤种群的遗传结构。 (原文中“. ”部分内容缺失,导致翻译不太完整准确)

Biocontrol Strains Differentially Shift the Genetic Structure of Indigenous Soil Populations of .

作者信息

Lewis Mary H, Carbone Ignazio, Luis Jane M, Payne Gary A, Bowen Kira L, Hagan Austin K, Kemerait Robert, Heiniger Ron, Ojiambo Peter S

机构信息

Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Center for Integrated Fungal Research, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1738. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01738. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01738
PMID:31417528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6685141/
Abstract

Biocontrol using non-aflatoxigenic strains of has the greatest potential to mitigate aflatoxin contamination in agricultural produce. However, factors that influence the efficacy of biocontrol agents in reducing aflatoxin accumulation under field conditions are not well-understood. Shifts in the genetic structure of indigenous soil populations of following application of biocontrol products Afla-Guard and AF36 were investigated to determine how these changes can influence the efficacy of biocontrol strains in reducing aflatoxin contamination. Soil samples were collected from maize fields in Alabama, Georgia, and North Carolina in 2012 and 2013 to determine changes in the population genetic structure of in the soil following application of the biocontrol strains. L was the most dominant species of section with a frequency ranging from 61 to 100%, followed by that had a frequency of <35%. The frequency of L increased, while that of decreased after application of biocontrol strains. A total of 112 multilocus haplotypes (MLHs) were inferred from 1,282 isolates of L using multilocus sequence typing of the , and AF17 loci. individuals belonging to the Afla-Guard MLH in the IB lineage were the most dominant before and after application of biocontrol strains, while individuals of the AF36 MLH in the IC lineage were either recovered in very low frequencies or not recovered at harvest. There were no significant ( > 0.05) differences in the frequency of individuals with and for clone-corrected MLH data, an indication of a recombining population resulting from sexual reproduction. Population mean mutation rates were not different across temporal and spatial scales indicating that mutation alone is not a driving force in observed multilocus sequence diversity. Clustering based on principal component analysis identified two distinct evolutionary lineages (IB and IC) across all three states. Additionally, patristic distance analysis revealed phylogenetic incongruency among single locus phylogenies which suggests ongoing genetic exchange and recombination. Levels of aflatoxin accumulation were very low except in North Carolina in 2012, where aflatoxin levels were significantly ( < 0.05) lower in grain from treated compared to untreated plots. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Afla-Guard was more effective than AF36 in shifting the indigenous soil populations of toward the non-toxigenic or low aflatoxin producing IB lineage. These results suggest that Afla-Guard, which matches the genetic and ecological structure of indigenous soil populations of in Alabama, Georgia, and North Carolina, is likely to be more effective in reducing aflatoxin accumulation and will also persist longer in the soil than AF36 in the southeastern United States.

摘要

使用不产黄曲霉毒素的菌株进行生物防治,在减轻农产品中黄曲霉毒素污染方面具有最大潜力。然而,在田间条件下,影响生物防治剂减少黄曲霉毒素积累效果的因素尚不清楚。本研究调查了施用生物防治产品Afla-Guard和AF36后,本土土壤中该菌种群遗传结构的变化,以确定这些变化如何影响生物防治菌株减少黄曲霉毒素污染的效果。2012年和2013年从阿拉巴马州、佐治亚州和北卡罗来纳州的玉米田采集土壤样本,以确定施用生物防治菌株后土壤中该菌种群遗传结构的变化。L是该菌属中最主要的物种,频率范围为61%至100%,其次是频率<35%的另一种菌。施用生物防治菌株后,L的频率增加,而另一种菌的频率降低。使用该菌的、AF17位点的多位点序列分型,从1282株L菌株中推断出总共112个多位点单倍型(MLH)。在施用生物防治菌株前后,IB谱系中属于Afla-Guard MLH的个体最为占主导地位,而IC谱系中AF36 MLH的个体在收获时要么回收频率极低,要么未回收。对于克隆校正的MLH数据,具有某两种类型的个体频率没有显著差异(P>0.05),这表明是由有性繁殖导致的重组种群。在时间和空间尺度上,种群平均突变率没有差异,这表明仅突变不是观察到的多位点序列多样性的驱动力。基于主成分分析的聚类在所有三个州中识别出两个不同的进化谱系(IB和IC)。此外,简约距离分析揭示了单基因座系统发育之间的系统发育不一致,这表明正在进行基因交换和重组。除了2012年北卡罗来纳州外,黄曲霉毒素积累水平非常低,在该州,与未处理地块相比,处理地块谷物中的黄曲霉毒素水平显著降低(P<0.05)。系统发育分析表明,在将本土土壤中的该菌种群转向不产毒素或低黄曲霉毒素产生的IB谱系方面,Afla-Guard比AF36更有效。这些结果表明,与阿拉巴马州、佐治亚州和北卡罗来纳州本土土壤中该菌的遗传和生态结构相匹配的Afla-Guard,在美国东南部可能在减少黄曲霉毒素积累方面更有效,并且在土壤中持续时间也比AF36更长。

相似文献

1
Biocontrol Strains Differentially Shift the Genetic Structure of Indigenous Soil Populations of .生物防治菌株差异性地改变了……的本土土壤种群的遗传结构。 (原文中“. ”部分内容缺失,导致翻译不太完整准确)
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1738. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01738. eCollection 2019.
2
Asymmetrical lineage introgression and recombination in populations of Aspergillus flavus: Implications for biological control.黄曲霉种群中的不对称谱系渗入和重组:对生物防治的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276556. eCollection 2022.
3
Deciphering the origin of Aspergillus flavus NRRL21882, the active biocontrol agent of Afla-Guard.解析生防菌 Afla-Guard 的有效成分——黄曲霉 NRRL21882 的起源。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2021 May;72(5):509-516. doi: 10.1111/lam.13433. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Recombination and lineage-specific gene loss in the aflatoxin gene cluster of Aspergillus flavus.黄曲霉中黄曲霉毒素基因簇的重组和谱系特异性基因丢失。
Mol Ecol. 2009 Dec;18(23):4870-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04414.x. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
5
Genetic diversity of aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus flavus isolated from selected groundnut growing agro-ecological zones of Uganda.从乌干达选定的花生种植农业生态区分离的产黄曲霉毒素的黄曲霉的遗传多样性。
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01924-2.
6
Non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus to prevent aflatoxin contamination in crops: advantages and limitations.不产黄曲霉毒素的黄曲霉菌预防作物黄曲霉毒素污染:优势与局限性。
Front Microbiol. 2014 Feb 10;5:50. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00050. eCollection 2014.
7
Field Displacement of Aflatoxigenic Strains Through Repeated Biological Control Applications.通过重复生物防治应用实现产黄曲霉毒素菌株的田间替代
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 7;10:1788. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01788. eCollection 2019.
8
Genetic Analysis of the Aspergillus flavus Vegetative Compatibility Group to Which a Biological Control Agent That Limits Aflatoxin Contamination in U.S. Crops Belongs.对黄曲霉营养体亲和群的遗传分析,美国一种限制作物中黄曲霉毒素污染的生物防治剂所属的营养体亲和群。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep 1;81(17):5889-99. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00738-15. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Quantification of the Aflatoxin Biocontrol Strain AF36 in Soil and in Nuts and Leaves of Pistachio by Real-Time PCR.通过实时荧光定量PCR对土壤以及开心果的坚果和叶片中黄曲霉毒素生物防治菌株AF36进行定量分析。
Plant Dis. 2021 Jun;105(6):1657-1665. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-20-1097-RE. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10
Genome-wide nucleotide variation distinguishes Aspergillus flavus from Aspergillus oryzae and helps to reveal origins of atoxigenic A. flavus biocontrol strains.全基因组核苷酸变异将黄曲霉与米曲霉区分开来,并有助于揭示无毒素黄曲霉生防菌株的起源。
J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Nov;127(5):1511-1520. doi: 10.1111/jam.14419. Epub 2019 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Aflatoxins in Peanut (): Prevalence, Global Health Concern, and Management from an Innovative Nanotechnology Approach: A Mechanistic Repertoire and Future Direction.花生中的黄曲霉毒素():流行情况、全球健康问题以及基于创新纳米技术方法的管理:作用机制概述与未来方向
ACS Omega. 2024 Jun 6;9(24):25555-25574. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01316. eCollection 2024 Jun 18.
2
Exploring the Biocontrol Capability of Non-Mycotoxigenic Strains of .探索非产毒菌株的生防能力。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;16(1):52. doi: 10.3390/toxins16010052.
3
Advanced mycotoxin control and decontamination techniques in view of an increased aflatoxin risk in Europe due to climate change.

本文引用的文献

1
T-BAS Version 2.1: Tree-Based Alignment Selector Toolkit for Evolutionary Placement of DNA Sequences and Viewing Alignments and Specimen Metadata on Curated and Custom Trees.T-BAS版本2.1:用于DNA序列进化定位以及在经过整理的树和自定义树上查看比对及标本元数据的基于树的比对选择工具包。
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019 Jul 18;8(29):e00328-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00328-19.
2
Aspergillus flavus in Soils and Corncobs in South Texas: Implications for Management of Aflatoxins in Corn-Cotton Rotations.南得克萨斯州土壤和玉米芯中的黄曲霉:对玉米-棉花轮作中黄曲霉毒素管理的启示
Plant Dis. 2004 Dec;88(12):1366-1371. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.12.1366.
3
鉴于气候变化导致欧洲黄曲霉毒素风险增加,先进的霉菌毒素控制和去污技术
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1085891. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1085891. eCollection 2022.
4
Comprehensive Review of Aflatoxin Contamination, Impact on Health and Food Security, and Management Strategies in Pakistan.巴基斯坦黄曲霉毒素污染、对健康和粮食安全的影响及管理策略的综合评述
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;14(12):845. doi: 10.3390/toxins14120845.
5
Characterization of the Population from Highly Aflatoxin-Contaminated Corn in the United States.美国高度受黄曲霉毒素污染玉米人群的特征。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;14(11):755. doi: 10.3390/toxins14110755.
6
Ochratoxin A Defective Mutants as Potential Biocontrol Agents.赭曲霉毒素 A 缺陷型突变体作为潜在的生防制剂。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Oct 31;14(11):745. doi: 10.3390/toxins14110745.
7
Antagonism of nonaflatoxigenic isolated from peanuts against aflatoxigenic growth and aflatoxin B production .从花生中分离出的非产黄曲霉毒素菌株对产黄曲霉毒素菌株生长及黄曲霉毒素B产生的拮抗作用
Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Aug 24;10(11):3993-4002. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2995. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Asymmetrical lineage introgression and recombination in populations of Aspergillus flavus: Implications for biological control.黄曲霉种群中的不对称谱系渗入和重组:对生物防治的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276556. eCollection 2022.
9
Validation and Ecological Niche Investigation of a New Fungal Intraspecific Competitor as a Biocontrol Agent for the Sustainable Containment of Aflatoxins on Maize Fields.一种新型真菌种内竞争剂作为玉米田黄曲霉毒素可持续防控生物防治剂的验证及生态位研究
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;8(5):425. doi: 10.3390/jof8050425.
10
Janus-Faced Molecules against Plant Pathogenic Fungi.两面派分子对抗植物病原真菌。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 15;22(22):12323. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212323.
Population Subdivision and the Frequency of Aflatoxigenic Isolates in in the United States.
人群划分与美国黄曲霉产毒菌的频率。
Phytopathology. 2019 May;109(5):878-886. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0263-R. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
4
Cultural and Genetic Approaches to Manage Aflatoxin Contamination: Recent Insights Provide Opportunities for Improved Control.文化和遗传方法管理黄曲霉毒素污染:最新见解为改善控制提供了机会。
Phytopathology. 2018 Sep;108(9):1024-1037. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-18-0134-RVW. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
5
Genetic and Toxigenic Variability within Population Isolated from Maize in Two Diverse Environments in Kenya.在肯尼亚两个不同环境中从玉米分离出的群体内的遗传和产毒变异性。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jan 26;9:57. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00057. eCollection 2018.
6
Biological Control Products for Aflatoxin Prevention in Italy: Commercial Field Evaluation of Atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus Active Ingredients.意大利用于预防黄曲霉毒素的生物防治产品:产黄曲霉素无毒曲霉菌活性成分的商业田间评估。
Toxins (Basel). 2018 Jan 5;10(1):30. doi: 10.3390/toxins10010030.
7
Balancing selection for aflatoxin in is maintained through interference competition with, and fungivory by insects.通过与 和昆虫的真菌食性的干扰竞争,对黄曲霉毒素在 中进行了平衡选择。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 20;284(1869). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2408.
8
Global population structure and adaptive evolution of aflatoxin-producing fungi.产黄曲霉毒素真菌的全球种群结构与适应性进化
Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep 30;7(21):9179-9191. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3464. eCollection 2017 Nov.
9
Biological Control of Aflatoxin Contamination in U.S. Crops and the Use of Bioplastic Formulations of Aspergillus flavus Biocontrol Strains To Optimize Application Strategies.美国作物中黄曲霉毒素污染的生物防治及黄曲霉生防菌株的生物塑料制剂的应用以优化应用策略。
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Aug 23;65(33):7081-7087. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01452. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
10
T-BAS: Tree-Based Alignment Selector toolkit for phylogenetic-based placement, alignment downloads and metadata visualization: an example with the Pezizomycotina tree of life.T-BAS:用于基于系统发育的定位、比对下载和元数据可视化的基于树的比对选择器工具包:以盘菌亚门生命树为例
Bioinformatics. 2017 Apr 15;33(8):1160-1168. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw808.