ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9557.
Nursing home residents with advanced dementia have limited life expectancies yet are commonly subjected to burdensome interventions at the very end of life. Whether sex-specific differences in the receipt of these interventions exist and what levels of physical restraints and antibiotics are used in this terminal setting are unknown.
To evaluate the population-based frequency, factors, and sex differences in burdensome interventions and antibiotic therapy among nursing home residents with advanced dementia.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study from Ontario, Canada, used linked administrative databases held at ICES, including the Continuing Care Resident Reporting System Long-Term Care database, which contains data from the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set, version 2.0. Nursing home residents (n = 27 243) with advanced dementia who died between June 1, 2010, and March 31, 2015, at 66 years or older were included in the analysis. Initial statistical analysis was completed in May 2017, and analytical revisions were conducted from November 2018 to January 2019.
Sex of the nursing home resident.
Burdensome interventions (transitions of care, invasive procedures, and physical restraints) and antibiotic therapy in the last 30 days of life.
The final cohort included 27 243 nursing home residents with advanced dementia (19 363 [71.1%] women) who died between June 1, 2010, and March 31, 2015, at the median (interquartile range) age of 88 (83-92) years. In the last 30 days of life, burdensome interventions were common, especially among men: 5940 (21.8%) residents were hospitalized (3661 women [18.9%] vs 2279 men [28.9%]; P < .001), 2433 (8.9%) had an emergency department visit (1579 women [8.2%] vs 854 men [10.8%]; P < .001), and 3701 (13.6%) died in an acute care facility (2276 women [11.8%] vs 1425 men [18.1%]; P < .001). Invasive procedures were also common; 2673 residents (9.8%) were attended for life-threatening critical care (1672 women [8.6%] vs 1001 men [12.7%]; P < .001), and 210 (0.8%) received mechanical ventilation (113 women [0.6%] vs 97 men [1.2%]; P < .001). Among the 9844 residents (36.1%) who had a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set, version 2.0, completed in the last 30 days of life, 2842 (28.9%) were physically restrained (2002 women [28.3%] vs 840 men [30.4%]; P = .005). More than one-third (9873 [36.2%]) of all residents received an antibiotic (6599 women [34.1%] vs 3264 men [41.4%]; P < .001). In multivariable models, men were more likely to have a transition of care (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.49; P < .001) and receive antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.26-1.41; P < .001). Only 3309 residents (12.1%; 2382 women [12.3%] vs 927 men [11.8%]) saw a palliative care physician in the year before death, but those who did experienced greater than 50% lower odds of an end-of-life transition of care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.43-0.54); P < .001) and greater than 25% lower odds of receiving antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.81; P < .001).
In this study, many nursing home residents with advanced dementia, especially men, received burdensome interventions and antibiotics in their final days of life. These findings appear to emphasize the need for sex-specific analysis in dementia research as well as the expansion of palliative care and end-of-life antimicrobial stewardship in nursing homes.
重要性:患有晚期痴呆症的疗养院居民预期寿命有限,但在生命末期通常会承受负担过重的干预措施。在这些干预措施中是否存在基于性别的差异,以及在这一终末环境中使用何种水平的身体约束和抗生素尚不清楚。
目的:评估基于人群的、患有晚期痴呆症的疗养院居民接受负担过重的干预措施和抗生素治疗的频率、影响因素以及性别差异。
设计、地点和参与者:这项来自加拿大安大略省的基于人群的队列研究使用了安大略省评估研究所(ICES)的链接行政数据库,包括持续护理居民报告系统长期护理数据库,该数据库包含居民评估工具最低数据集中的 2.0 版数据。在分析中纳入了在 2010 年 6 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日期间年龄在 66 岁或以上、患有晚期痴呆症且死亡的 27243 名疗养院居民。初始统计分析于 2017 年 5 月完成,从 2018 年 11 月到 2019 年 1 月进行了分析修订。
暴露:疗养院居民的性别。
主要结果和措施:生命最后 30 天的负担过重的干预措施(转院、侵入性操作和身体约束)和抗生素治疗。
结果:最终队列包括 27243 名患有晚期痴呆症的疗养院居民(19363 名[71.1%]为女性),他们在 2010 年 6 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日期间死亡,中位年龄为 88(83-92)岁。在生命的最后 30 天里,常见的是负担过重的干预措施,尤其是男性:5940 名居民(21.8%)住院(3661 名女性[18.9%]与 2279 名男性[28.9%]相比;P<0.001),2433 名(8.9%)去了急诊(1579 名女性[8.2%]与 854 名男性[10.8%]相比;P<0.001),3701 名(13.6%)在急性护理机构死亡(2276 名女性[11.8%]与 1425 名男性[18.1%]相比;P<0.001)。侵入性操作也很常见;2673 名居民(9.8%)因危及生命的重症监护而接受治疗(1672 名女性[8.6%]与 1001 名男性[12.7%]相比;P<0.001),210 名(0.8%)接受机械通气(113 名女性[0.6%]与 97 名男性[1.2%]相比;P<0.001)。在最后 30 天完成的 9844 名居民(36.1%)中,有 2892 名(28.9%)接受了身体约束(2002 名女性[28.3%]与 840 名男性[30.4%]相比;P=0.005)。超过三分之一(9873 名[36.2%])的居民接受了抗生素治疗(6599 名女性[34.1%]与 3264 名男性[41.4%]相比;P<0.001)。在多变量模型中,男性更有可能转院(调整后的优势比,1.41;95%置信区间,1.33-1.49;P<0.001)和接受抗生素治疗(调整后的优势比,1.33;95%置信区间,1.26-1.41;P<0.001)。只有 3309 名居民(12.1%;2382 名女性[12.3%]与 927 名男性[11.8%])在死亡前一年看过姑息治疗医生,但这些患者在临终转院方面的几率降低了 50%以上(调整后的优势比,0.48;95%置信区间,0.43-0.54);P<0.001),接受抗生素的几率降低了 25%以上(调整后的优势比,0.74;95%置信区间,0.68-0.81;P<0.001)。
结论和相关性:在这项研究中,许多患有晚期痴呆症的疗养院居民,尤其是男性,在生命的最后几天接受了负担过重的干预措施和抗生素治疗。这些发现似乎强调了在痴呆症研究中需要进行基于性别的分析,以及在疗养院中扩大姑息治疗和临终期抗生素管理。