Mehta Nishila, Rodrigues Craig, Lamba Manpreet, Wu Wei, Bronskill Susan E, Herrmann Nathan, Gill Sudeep S, Chan An-Wen, Mason Robin, Day Suzanne, Gurwitz Jerry H, Rochon Paula A
Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Medical Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Oct;65(10):2213-2219. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15020. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
To improve the value of research for older adults, we examine sex-specific reporting of data from drug trials for the management of dementia. These data are important because they may influence considerations ranging from the health of populations to shared decision-making by individual patient and caregiver about the risk and benefit of a drug therapy.
Randomized controlled trials of cholinesterase inhibitors (i.e., donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine) with clinical outcomes were identified from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Sex-specific data were extracted from nine sections (title, abstract, introduction, methods, outcomes, results, discussion, limitations, and conclusion). Among the donepezil trials only, more detailed harms data were obtained.
Thirty-three randomized controlled trials were identified evaluating 15,971 participants (9,103 (57%) female). Trials were highly cited (median citations 158, interquartile range 62-441) and published in high impact journals (median impact factor 7.4, interquartile range 3.4-8.2). Sex was not mentioned in the title, introduction, limitations, or conclusion section of any trial. Only three trials (9%) mentioned sex in the abstract (all as a demographic characteristic), and 8 (24%) in the methods. Almost all (32 (97%)) trials mentioned sex in the results as a demographic variable. One trial reported a sex difference for a secondary outcome. Among the 16 trials studying donepezil, adverse events were frequently reported and often dose-related. No trial provided sex-specific reporting of adverse events.
There is an almost complete lack of sex-specific reporting of data in clinical trials for dementia drug therapies, and no sex-specific reporting of adverse events. Sex-specific reporting of data should be required in drug trials to increase research value and ultimately inform more tailored prescribing for older adults.
为提高针对老年人的研究价值,我们研究了痴呆症治疗药物试验数据按性别分类的报告情况。这些数据很重要,因为它们可能会影响从人群健康到个体患者及护理人员关于药物治疗风险和益处的共同决策等诸多方面的考量。
通过检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,确定了有临床结局的胆碱酯酶抑制剂(即多奈哌齐、卡巴拉汀或加兰他敏)随机对照试验。从九个部分(标题、摘要、引言、方法、结局、结果、讨论、局限性和结论)提取按性别分类的数据。仅在多奈哌齐试验中,获取了更详细的不良事件数据。
共确定了33项随机对照试验,涉及15971名参与者(9103名(57%)女性)。试验被大量引用(中位引用次数158,四分位间距62 - 441),并发表在高影响力期刊上(中位影响因子7.4,四分位间距3.4 - 8.2)。在任何试验的标题、引言、局限性或结论部分均未提及性别。只有三项试验(9%)在摘要中提及性别(均作为人口统计学特征),八项试验(24%)在方法部分提及。几乎所有试验(32项(97%))在结果部分将性别作为人口统计学变量提及。一项试验报告了次要结局的性别差异。在研究多奈哌齐的16项试验中,不良事件经常被报告,且往往与剂量相关。没有试验提供不良事件的按性别分类报告。
痴呆症药物治疗的临床试验几乎完全缺乏按性别分类的数据报告,也没有不良事件的按性别分类报告。药物试验应要求提供按性别分类的数据报告,以提高研究价值,并最终为老年人提供更具针对性的处方建议。