Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1100-1110. doi: 10.1111/hex.12943. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing both globally and in Asia. Singapore has the fifth highest incidence of ESRD worldwide, a trend that is predicted to rise. Older patients with ESRD are faced with a choice of haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or conservative management, all of which have their risks and benefits.
This study seeks to explore perspectives on decision making amongst older (≥70) Singaporean ESRD patients and their caregivers to undergo (or not to undergo) dialysis.
Qualitative study design using semi-structured interviews.
Twenty-three participants were recruited from the largest tertiary hospital in Singapore: seven peritoneal dialysis patients, five haemodialysis patients, four patients on conservative management and seven caregivers.
While some patients believed that they had made an independent treatment decision, others reported feeling like they had no choice in the matter or that they were strongly persuaded by their doctors and/or family members to undergo dialysis. Patients reported decision-making factors including loss of autonomy in daily life, financial burden (on themselves or on their families), caregiving burden, alternative medicine, symptoms and disease progression. Caregivers also reported concerns about financial and caregiving burden.
This study has identified several factors that should be considered in the design and implementation of decision aids to help older ESRD patients in Singapore make informed treatment decisions, including patients' and caregivers' decision-making factors as well as the relational dynamics between patients, caregivers and doctors.
终末期肾病(ESRD)在全球范围内和亚洲都呈上升趋势。新加坡的 ESRD 发病率位居全球第五,预计这一趋势还将继续上升。患有 ESRD 的老年患者面临着血液透析、腹膜透析或保守治疗的选择,每种选择都有其风险和益处。
本研究旨在探讨新加坡老年(≥70 岁)ESRD 患者及其照顾者在接受(或不接受)透析治疗方面的决策观点。
采用半结构式访谈的定性研究设计。
从新加坡最大的三级医院招募了 23 名参与者:7 名腹膜透析患者、5 名血液透析患者、4 名保守治疗患者和 7 名照顾者。
虽然有些患者认为他们已经做出了独立的治疗决策,但也有一些患者报告说他们感觉自己别无选择,或者他们受到医生和/或家庭成员的强烈劝说进行透析。患者报告的决策因素包括日常生活中自主性的丧失、经济负担(对自己或家人)、照顾负担、替代医学、症状和疾病进展。照顾者也报告了对经济和照顾负担的担忧。
本研究确定了一些应在设计和实施决策辅助工具时考虑的因素,以帮助新加坡的老年 ESRD 患者做出明智的治疗决策,这些因素包括患者和照顾者的决策因素以及患者、照顾者和医生之间的关系动态。