Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病患者和照护者的预先医疗照护计划观点访谈研究。

An Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in ESRD.

机构信息

Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Kolling Institute, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; HammondCare Palliative & Supportive Care Service, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Improving Palliative Care through Clinical Trials (ImPaCCT), New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):216-224. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) empowers patients to consider and communicate their current and future treatment goals. However, it can be an emotionally charged process for patients with kidney disease and their caregivers. This study aimed to describe the perspectives and attitudes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and their caregivers toward ACP.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ESRD (n=24) and their caregivers (n=15) aged 36 to 91 years at various stages of ACP ("not commenced," "in progress," or "completed") from 3 renal services.

METHODOLOGY

Semistructured interviews.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

5 major themes were identified: articulating core values (avoiding futile and undignified treatment, reevaluating terms of dialysis, framing a life worth living, and refusing to be a burden), confronting conversations (signifying death and defeat, accepting inevitable death, and alleviating existential tension), negotiating mutual understanding (broaching taboos and assisting conflicted caregivers), challenging patient autonomy (family pressures to continue dialysis, grief diminishing caregivers' capacity, and leveraging support), and decisional disempowerment (lacking medical transparency and disappointment with clinical disinterest).

LIMITATIONS

Only English-speaking patients/caregivers participated in the interview.

CONCLUSIONS

ACP provides patients with ESRD and their caregivers a conduit for accepting and planning for impending death and to express treatment preferences based on self-dignity and value of living. However, ACP can be considered taboo, may require caregivers to overcome personal and decisional conflict, and may be complex if patients and caregivers are unable to accept the reality of the patient's illness. We suggest that ACP facilitators and clinicians make ACP more acceptable and less confrontational to patients and caregivers and that strategies be put in place to support caregivers who may be experiencing overwhelming grief or who have conflicting goals, particularly when they are called on to make end-of-life decisions.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划(ACP)使患者能够考虑并传达他们当前和未来的治疗目标。然而,对于患有肾脏疾病的患者及其护理人员来说,这可能是一个充满情感的过程。本研究旨在描述终末期肾病(ESRD)患者及其护理人员对 ACP 的观点和态度。

研究设计

定性研究。

研究场所和参与者

来自 3 个肾脏服务机构的处于 ACP 不同阶段(“未开始”、“进行中”或“完成”)的 ESRD 患者(n=24)及其护理人员(n=15),年龄 36 至 91 岁。

方法

半结构式访谈。

分析方法

使用主题分析对转录本进行分析。

结果

确定了 5 个主要主题:表达核心价值观(避免徒劳无益和不体面的治疗、重新评估透析条件、构建有价值的生活、拒绝成为负担)、面对对话(表示死亡和失败、接受不可避免的死亡、缓解存在的紧张)、协商相互理解(触及禁忌和帮助有冲突的护理人员、挑战患者自主权(家庭压力继续进行透析、护理人员的悲伤削弱了他们的能力、利用支持)和决策无能为力(缺乏医疗透明度和对临床漠不关心的失望)。

局限性

只有会说英语的患者/护理人员参与了访谈。

结论

ACP 为 ESRD 患者及其护理人员提供了一个渠道,使他们能够接受并计划即将到来的死亡,并根据尊严和生活价值表达治疗偏好。然而,ACP 可能被视为禁忌,可能需要护理人员克服个人和决策冲突,如果患者和护理人员无法接受患者疾病的现实,ACP 可能会变得复杂。我们建议 ACP 协调员和临床医生使 ACP 对患者和护理人员更易接受和不那么具有对抗性,并制定策略来支持可能正在经历巨大悲痛或目标冲突的护理人员,特别是当他们被要求做出临终决策时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验