• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用标准化评估测量外科住院医师的不确定性容忍度。

Measuring Uncertainty Intolerance in Surgical Residents Using Standardized Assessments.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.035. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.035
PMID:31419639
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians are frequently called on to make medical decisions despite being uncertain about the outcomes of these choices. The psychological stress associated with these dilemmas, known as "Uncertainty Intolerance" (UI), can significantly impact the quality of a physician's practice as well as their own mental health. Coping with uncertainty is an important competency that all residents must master, and some residency programs are introducing new education initiatives aimed at improving UI. However, currently there is no standard protocol for measuring UI or the effectiveness of such interventions and there are no established methods for identifying the residents who would most benefit from the training. In this study, we aim to use the Physician Reaction to Uncertainty (PRU) and Physician Risk Attitude (PRA) scales as assessments for UI in surgical residents, and to determine if Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality factors are associated with PRU and PRA scores and can be used to identify residents who are more likely to have higher UI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PRU and PRA scales, and the MBTI assessment were administered to a total pool of 71 general surgery residents. In addition to the survey questions, residents provided information regarding their gender (male or female), and stage of training (junior or senior).

RESULTS

In total, 45 male residents and 25 female residents completed the PRA and PRU scales (98.6%). There were no statistically significant differences when comparisons were made between junior and senior residents or male and female residents. Thirty seven male residents and 18 female residents also completed the MBTI assessment (80.4% and 72%, respectively). PRU and PRA scores were analyzed with respect to personality factors to determine if certain dichotomies are associated with increased UI. There was a trend toward higher UI in individuals identifying with Judging.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have conducted a pilot study using the PRU and PRA scales to measuring the success of our new education initiatives aimed at improving uncertainty tolerance. We found that the PRU and PRA assessments were simple to administer and had a high completion rate. Our findings also suggest that individuals who identify with Judging may better tolerate the uncertainties associated with surgical practice, although larger studies will be required to determine if MBTI factors are linked to UI in surgical residents.

摘要

背景

尽管医师对这些选择的结果不确定,但他们经常需要做出医疗决策。与这些困境相关的心理压力被称为“不确定性容忍度”(UI),这会极大地影响医师的实践质量和他们自己的心理健康。应对不确定性是所有住院医师必须掌握的重要能力,一些住院医师培训计划正在引入新的教育计划,旨在提高 UI。然而,目前尚无测量 UI 的标准方案,也没有评估这些干预措施效果的既定方法,也没有确定最需要培训的住院医师的方法。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用医师对不确定性的反应(PRU)和医师风险态度(PRA)量表来评估外科住院医师的 UI,并确定 Myers-Briggs 类型指标(MBTI)人格因素是否与 PRU 和 PRA 分数相关,以及是否可以用于识别更有可能出现较高 UI 的住院医师。

材料与方法

共向 71 名普通外科住院医师发放了 PRU 和 PRA 量表以及 MBTI 评估。除了调查问题外,住院医师还提供了有关其性别(男性或女性)和培训阶段(初级或高级)的信息。

结果

共有 45 名男性住院医师和 25 名女性住院医师完成了 PRA 和 PRU 量表(98.6%)。在初级和高级住院医师或男性和女性住院医师之间进行比较时,没有统计学上的显着差异。37 名男性住院医师和 18 名女性住院医师也完成了 MBTI 评估(分别为 80.4%和 72%)。分析了 PRU 和 PRA 分数与人格因素的关系,以确定某些二分法是否与 UI 增加相关。具有判断特征的个体表现出更高 UI 的趋势。

结论

在这项研究中,我们使用 PRU 和 PRA 量表进行了一项试点研究,以衡量我们旨在提高不确定性容忍度的新教育计划的成功。我们发现 PRU 和 PRA 评估易于管理,并且完成率很高。我们的研究结果还表明,具有判断特征的个体可能更好地承受与外科实践相关的不确定性,尽管需要进行更大规模的研究才能确定 MBTI 因素是否与外科住院医师的 UI 相关。

相似文献

1
Measuring Uncertainty Intolerance in Surgical Residents Using Standardized Assessments.使用标准化评估测量外科住院医师的不确定性容忍度。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.035. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
2
The influence of surgeon personality factors on risk tolerance: a pilot study.外科医生人格因素对风险承受能力的影响:一项初步研究。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):806-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.07.014.
3
Personality Types: Predictors for Pediatric Dentists-Pilot Study.人格类型:儿科牙医的预测因素——初步研究。
Tex Dent J. 2017 May;134(5):286-297.
4
Anesthesiology resident personality type correlates with faculty assessment of resident performance.麻醉科住院医师的人格类型与教师对住院医师表现的评估相关。
J Clin Anesth. 2012 Nov;24(7):566-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.008.
5
The association between Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Psychiatry as the specialty choice.迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标与将精神病学作为专业选择之间的关联。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 6;7:48-51. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5698.e2cd.
6
Physician personality types in physical medicine and rehabilitation as measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.通过迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标衡量的物理医学与康复领域医生的性格类型。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Sep-Oct;73(5):308-12. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199409000-00002.
7
A comparative view of the Myers-Briggs type indicator.迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标的比较视角。
Fam Med. 1993 Mar;25(3):186-90.
8
The Myers-Briggs type indicator association with United States medical student performance, demographics, and career values.迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标与美国医学生表现、人口统计学和职业价值观的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):1293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06297-y.
9
Resident physicians who continue Balint training: a longitudinal study 1982-1999.继续巴林特培训的住院医师:一项1982 - 1999年的纵向研究
Fam Med. 2003 Jun;35(6):428-33.
10
COVID-19 Impact on Surgical Resident Education and Coping.COVID-19 对外科住院医师教育和应对的影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:534-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Inpatient Subspecialty Consultation Patterns Among Pediatric Hospitalists.儿科医院医师中与住院患者专科会诊模式相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232648. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2648.