• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clean Cut 的定性结果:减少埃塞俄比亚手术感染的实施经验教训。

Qualitative outcomes of Clean Cut: implementation lessons from reducing surgical infections in Ethiopia.

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 17;19(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4383-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4383-8
PMID:31419972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6698005/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clean Cut is a six month, multi-modal, adaptive intervention aimed at reducing surgical infections through improving six critical perioperative processes: 1) handwashing/skin preparation, 2) surgical gown/drape integrity, 3) antibiotic administration, 4) instrument sterility, 5) gauze counts, and 6) WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use. The aim of this study was to elucidate themes across Clean Cut implementation sites in Ethiopia to improve implementation at future hospitals.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews of 20 clinicians involved in Clean Cut at four hospitals. Participation was limited to Clean Cut team members and included surgeons, anesthetists, operating room (OR) nurses, ward nurses, OR managers, quality improvement personnel, and hospital administrators. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded using qualitative software. A codebook was inductively and iteratively derived between two researchers, tested for inter-rater reliability, and applied to all transcripts. We conducted thematic analysis to derive our final qualitative results.

RESULTS

The interviews revealed barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Clean Cut, as well as strategies for future implementation sites. Key barriers included material resource limitations, feelings of job burden, existing gaps in infection prevention education, and communication errors during data collection. Common facilitators included strong hospital leadership support, commitment to improved patient outcomes, and organized Clean Cut training sessions. Future strategies include resource assessments, creating a sense of responsibility among staff, targeted training sessions, and incorporating new standards into daily routine.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study highlight the importance of engaging hospital leadership, providers and staff in quality improvement programs, and understanding their work contexts. The identified barriers and facilitators will inform future initiatives in the field of perioperative infection prevention.

摘要

背景

Clean Cut 是一项为期六个月的多模式、自适应干预措施,旨在通过改善六个关键手术期流程来减少手术感染:1)洗手/皮肤准备,2)手术服/手术巾完整性,3)抗生素使用,4)器械无菌性,5)纱布计数,以及 6)使用世卫组织手术安全检查表。本研究旨在阐明 Clean Cut 在埃塞俄比亚实施点的主题,以提高未来医院的实施效果。

方法

我们对四家医院的 20 名参与 Clean Cut 的临床医生进行了半结构式访谈。参与者仅限于 Clean Cut 团队成员,包括外科医生、麻醉师、手术室护士、病房护士、手术室经理、质量改进人员和医院管理人员。音频记录被转录并使用定性软件进行编码。两位研究人员之间使用归纳和迭代法得出代码本,并进行了组内信度测试,然后应用于所有转录本。我们进行了主题分析,以得出最终的定性结果。

结果

访谈揭示了 Clean Cut 实施的障碍和促进因素,以及未来实施点的策略。主要障碍包括物质资源限制、工作负担感、感染预防教育方面的现有差距以及数据收集过程中的沟通错误。常见的促进因素包括医院领导的大力支持、对改善患者结果的承诺以及有组织的 Clean Cut 培训课程。未来的策略包括资源评估、在员工中建立责任感、有针对性的培训课程以及将新标准纳入日常工作。

结论

本研究结果强调了让医院领导、医务人员和工作人员参与质量改进计划以及了解其工作环境的重要性。确定的障碍和促进因素将为手术期感染预防领域的未来举措提供信息。

相似文献

1
Qualitative outcomes of Clean Cut: implementation lessons from reducing surgical infections in Ethiopia.Clean Cut 的定性结果:减少埃塞俄比亚手术感染的实施经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 17;19(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4383-8.
2
Developing Process Maps as a Tool for a Surgical Infection Prevention Quality Improvement Initiative in Resource-Constrained Settings.制定流程地图作为资源有限环境下外科感染预防质量改进计划的工具。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jun;226(6):1103-1116.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Clean Cut (adaptive, multimodal surgical infection prevention programme) for low-resource settings: a prospective quality improvement study.清洁切割(自适应、多模式手术感染预防方案)用于资源匮乏环境:一项前瞻性质量改进研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):727-734. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11997.
4
Scalability and Sustainability of a Surgical Infection Prevention Program in Low-Income Environments.在低收入环境中实施手术感染预防计划的可扩展性和可持续性。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Feb 1;159(2):161-169. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6033.
5
A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".对英格兰各医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍和促进因素的定性评估:“手术核对表实施项目”的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):81-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000793.
6
Obstacles to implementation of an intervention to improve surgical services in an Ethiopian hospital: a qualitative study of an international health partnership project.埃塞俄比亚一家医院实施改善外科服务干预措施的障碍:一项关于国际卫生伙伴关系项目的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1639-4.
7
Long-Term Sustainability of Peri-Operative Infection Control Practices: Implementation of "Clean Cut," a Checklist-Based Quality Improvement Program in India.围手术期感染控制措施的长期可持续性:在印度实施“清洁切口”,基于检查表的质量改进计划。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024 Aug;25(6):452-458. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
8
Preventing surgical site infections: Facilitators and barriers to nurses' adherence to clinical practice guidelines-A qualitative study.预防手术部位感染:护士遵循临床实践指南的促进因素和障碍——一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1643-1652. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14766. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
Evaluation of an adaptive, multimodal intervention to reduce postoperative infections following cesarean delivery in Ethiopia: study protocol of the CLEAN-CS cluster-randomized stepped wedge interventional trial.评估一种适应性、多模式干预措施,以减少埃塞俄比亚剖宫产术后感染:CLEAN-CS 聚类随机化阶梯式干预试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Aug 19;23(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06500-9.
10
Development of a Surgical Infection Surveillance Program at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: Lessons Learned from Two Surveillance Strategies.埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院手术感染监测项目的开展:从两种监测策略中吸取的经验教训。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):25-32. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.136. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with successful implementation of Clean Cut: a perioperative surgical site infection prevention quality improvement programme-a cohort study of low-resource hospitals.与“精准开刀”成功实施相关的因素:一项围手术期手术部位感染预防质量改进计划——低资源医院的队列研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Mar 3;10(3):e018049. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018049.
2
Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia.定性驱动因素术后预防性抗生素使用和耐药性在埃塞俄比亚。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):1267. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11650-4.
3
A Perioperative Quality Improvement Program for Cesarean Delivery in Ethiopia: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.围手术期质量改进计划在埃塞俄比亚剖宫产中的应用:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428910. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28910.
4
Current practices and evaluation of barriers and facilitators to surgical site infection prevention measures in Jimma, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚吉马地区外科手术部位感染预防措施的当前实践以及对相关障碍和促进因素的评估
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 17;1(1):e51. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.227. eCollection 2021.
5
Approaches to multidrug-resistant organism prevention and control in long-term care facilities for older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人长期护理机构中多重耐药菌预防和控制方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jan 15;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-01044-0.
6
Clean Cut (adaptive, multimodal surgical infection prevention programme) for low-resource settings: a prospective quality improvement study.清洁切割(自适应、多模式手术感染预防方案)用于资源匮乏环境:一项前瞻性质量改进研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):727-734. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11997.
7
How much is enough? Exploring the dose-response relationship between cash transfers and surgical utilization in a resource-poor setting.现金转移支付与资源匮乏环境下手术利用之间的剂量反应关系研究:多少才算足够?
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232761. eCollection 2020.
8
Value and Feasibility of Telephone Follow-Up in Ethiopian Surgical Patients.电话随访在埃塞俄比亚外科患者中的价值和可行性。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Aug;21(6):533-539. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.054. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.WHO 手术安全检查表使用与急诊剖腹手术后死亡率的汇总分析。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e103-e112. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11051.
2
Developing Process Maps as a Tool for a Surgical Infection Prevention Quality Improvement Initiative in Resource-Constrained Settings.制定流程地图作为资源有限环境下外科感染预防质量改进计划的工具。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jun;226(6):1103-1116.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Obstacles to implementation of an intervention to improve surgical services in an Ethiopian hospital: a qualitative study of an international health partnership project.埃塞俄比亚一家医院实施改善外科服务干预措施的障碍:一项关于国际卫生伙伴关系项目的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1639-4.
4
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Reduction and Bundle Compliance in Intensive Care Units: A National Study.重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染的减少与集束化依从性:一项全国性研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):805-10. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.67. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Attitudes towards the surgical safety checklist and factors associated with its use: A global survey of frontline medical professionals.对外科手术安全核对表的态度及其使用相关因素:一项针对一线医疗专业人员的全球调查。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 Apr 20;4(2):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.04.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.
6
A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".对英格兰各医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍和促进因素的定性评估:“手术核对表实施项目”的经验教训
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):81-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000793.
7
EMS provider compliance with infection control recommendations is suboptimal.急救医疗服务提供者对感染控制建议的遵守情况并不理想。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):290-4. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.851311. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries.一项比较高收入和低收入国家医院手术安全检查表使用经验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 15;3(8):e003039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003039.
9
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.促进卫生服务研究成果在实践中的应用:推进实施科学的综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
10
Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research.定性研究方法和混合研究方法为结果研究做出了独特贡献。
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1442-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775.