• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多病症卒中幸存者决策辅助工具的协同设计:英国关键利益攸关方参与的定性研究。

Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders.

机构信息

Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e030385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030385.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030385
PMID:31420396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6701575/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Effective secondary stroke prevention strategies are suboptimally used. Novel development of interventions to enable healthcare professionals and stroke survivors to manage risk factors for stroke recurrence are required. We sought to engage key stakeholders in the design and evaluation of an intervention informed by a learning health system approach, to improve risk factor management and secondary prevention for stroke survivors with multimorbidity.

DESIGN

Qualitative, including focus groups, semistructured interviews and usability evaluations. Data was audio recorded, transcribed and coded thematically.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke survivors, carers, health and social care professionals, commissioners, policymakers and researchers.

SETTING

Stroke survivors were recruited from the South London Stroke Register; health and social care professionals through South London general practices and King's College London (KCL) networks; carers, commissioners, policymakers and researchers through KCL networks.

RESULTS

53 stakeholders in total participated in focus groups, interviews and usability evaluations. Thirty-seven participated in focus groups and interviews, including stroke survivors and carers (n=11), health and social care professionals (n=16), commissioners and policymakers (n=6) and researchers (n=4). Sixteen participated in usability evaluations, including stroke survivors (n=8) and general practitioners (GPs; n=8). Eight themes informed the collaborative design of DOTT (Deciding On Treatments Together), a decision aid integrated with the electronic health record system, to be used in primary care during clinical consultations between the healthcare professional and stroke survivor. DOTT aims to facilitate shared decision-making on personalised treatments leading to improved treatment adherence and risk control. DOTT was found acceptable and usable among stroke survivors and GPs during a series of evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

Adopting a user-centred data-driven design approach informed an intervention that is acceptable to users and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. A future feasibility study and subsequent clinical trial will provide evidence of the effectiveness of DOTT in reducing risk of stroke recurrence.

摘要

目的

有效的二级卒中预防策略并未得到充分利用。需要开发新的干预措施,使医疗保健专业人员和卒中幸存者能够管理卒中复发的风险因素。我们试图让关键利益相关者参与到一个基于学习型医疗系统方法的干预措施的设计和评估中,以改善患有多种疾病的卒中幸存者的风险因素管理和二级预防。

设计

定性研究,包括焦点小组、半结构化访谈和可用性评估。数据被录音、转录并进行主题编码。

参与者

卒中幸存者、照顾者、卫生和社会保健专业人员、决策者和研究人员。

地点

卒中幸存者从南伦敦卒中登记处招募;卫生和社会保健专业人员通过南伦敦全科医生和国王学院(KCL)网络招募;照顾者、决策者和研究人员通过 KCL 网络招募。

结果

共有 53 名利益相关者参与了焦点小组、访谈和可用性评估。37 人参加了焦点小组和访谈,包括卒中幸存者和照顾者(n=11)、卫生和社会保健专业人员(n=16)、决策者和政策制定者(n=6)和研究人员(n=4)。16 人参加了可用性评估,包括卒中幸存者(n=8)和全科医生(GPs;n=8)。八个主题为共同设计 DOTT(一起决定治疗方案)提供了信息,这是一种决策辅助工具,与电子健康记录系统集成,将在初级保健中由医疗保健专业人员和卒中幸存者在临床咨询中使用。DOTT 的目的是促进针对个性化治疗的共同决策,从而提高治疗依从性和风险控制。在一系列评估中,DOTT 被发现对卒中幸存者和全科医生来说是可接受和可用的。

结论

采用以用户为中心、数据驱动的设计方法为干预措施提供了信息,该干预措施被用户接受,并有可能改善患者的预后。未来的可行性研究和随后的临床试验将提供证据,证明 DOTT 能够降低卒中复发的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4047/6701575/1e5005e6269d/bmjopen-2019-030385f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4047/6701575/3aa2cc760ad0/bmjopen-2019-030385f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4047/6701575/1e5005e6269d/bmjopen-2019-030385f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4047/6701575/3aa2cc760ad0/bmjopen-2019-030385f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4047/6701575/1e5005e6269d/bmjopen-2019-030385f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders.多病症卒中幸存者决策辅助工具的协同设计:英国关键利益攸关方参与的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e030385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030385.
2
Shaping innovations in long-term care for stroke survivors with multimorbidity through stakeholder engagement.通过利益相关者参与塑造针对患有多种疾病的中风幸存者的长期护理创新。
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0177102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177102. eCollection 2017.
3
Engaging Stakeholders in the Design and Usability Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Improve Secondary Stroke Prevention.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:765-769.
4
5
Qualitative focus group study investigating experiences of accessing and engaging with social care services: perspectives of carers from diverse ethnic groups caring for stroke survivors.定性焦点小组研究:调查获得社会护理服务及参与其中的经历——照顾中风幸存者的不同族裔护理人员的观点
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 29;6(1):e009498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009498.
6
Stroke survivors', caregivers' and GPs' attitudes towards a polypill for the secondary prevention of stroke: a qualitative interview study.中风幸存者、护理人员及全科医生对用于中风二级预防的多效药丸的态度:一项定性访谈研究
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010458.
7
How is rehabilitation with and without an integrated self-management approach perceived by UK community-dwelling stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation to explore implementation and contextual variations.在英国,社区居住的中风幸存者如何看待有和没有综合自我管理方法的康复?一项定性的过程评估,旨在探索实施和背景变化。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):e014109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014109.
8
Barriers to medication adherence for the secondary prevention of stroke: a qualitative interview study in primary care.中风二级预防中药物依从性的障碍:一项初级保健中的定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Aug;66(649):e568-76. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685609. Epub 2016 May 23.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Development of the face-to-face component and recruitment strategy of a primary care digital social intervention for patients with asthma: Qualitative focus groups and interviews with stakeholders.面访环节的开发和针对哮喘患者的初级保健数字社交干预措施的招募策略:与利益相关者的定性焦点小组和访谈。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2407594. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2407594. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning health systems on the front lines to strengthen care against future pandemics and climate change: a rapid review.学习一线卫生系统,以加强应对未来大流行病和气候变化的护理:快速审查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11295-3.
2
A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.患者和公众参与实证性卒中研究的范围综述。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(9):962-972. doi: 10.1177/17474930241262638. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Co-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
'People like you?': how people with hypertension make sense of future cardiovascular risk-a qualitative study.“像你这样的人?”:高血压患者如何理解未来心血管风险——一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e023726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023726.
2
Global Burden of Stroke.全球卒中负担。
Semin Neurol. 2018 Apr;38(2):208-211. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649503. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke.改善卒中二级预防中可改变危险因素控制的干预措施。
共设计多病共存的照护:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 7;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03263-9.
4
Stroke Learning Health Systems: A Topical Narrative Review With Case Examples.卒中学习健康系统:一个具有案例分析的专题叙事性综述。
Stroke. 2023 Apr;54(4):1148-1159. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.036216. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Conceptualizing learning health systems: A mapping review.学习型健康系统的概念化:一项映射综述。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Jun 2;7(1):e10311. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10311. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
What influences informal caregivers' risk perceptions and responses to home care safety of older adults with disabilities: A qualitative study.哪些因素影响非正式照护者对残疾老年人居家照护安全的风险认知和应对:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;10:901457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.901457. eCollection 2022.
7
Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.开发一种针对住院脑卒中患者出院计划的患者决策辅助工具。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02679-1.
8
How do electronic risk assessment tools affect the communication and understanding of diagnostic uncertainty in the primary care consultation? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.电子风险评估工具如何影响初级保健咨询中诊断不确定性的沟通和理解?系统评价和主题综合。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 29;12(6):e060101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060101.
9
The Science of Learning Health Systems: Scoping Review of Empirical Research.学习型健康系统科学:实证研究的范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 23;10(2):e34907. doi: 10.2196/34907.
10
Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health.设计传播和可持续性,以促进对健康的公平影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:331-353. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052220-112457. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 7;5(5):CD009103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009103.pub3.
4
Engaging Stakeholders in the Design and Usability Evaluation of a Decision Aid to Improve Secondary Stroke Prevention.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:765-769.
5
Can learning health systems help organisations deliver personalised care?学习型健康系统能否帮助组织提供个性化医疗服务?
BMC Med. 2017 Oct 2;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0935-0.
6
The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients.诊断决策支持系统对会诊的影响:全科医生和患者的看法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6.
7
Shaping innovations in long-term care for stroke survivors with multimorbidity through stakeholder engagement.通过利益相关者参与塑造针对患有多种疾病的中风幸存者的长期护理创新。
PLoS One. 2017 May 5;12(5):e0177102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177102. eCollection 2017.
8
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中实施共同决策:来自MAGIC项目的经验教训。
BMJ. 2017 Apr 18;357:j1744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1744.
9
The Learning Healthcare System and Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.学习型医疗保健系统与心血管保健:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2017 Apr 4;135(14):e826-e857. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000480. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
10
Perceived risk of diabetes seriously underestimates actual diabetes risk: The KORA FF4 study.对糖尿病风险的认知严重低估了实际糖尿病风险:KORA FF4研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):e0171152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171152. eCollection 2017.