• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种针对住院脑卒中患者出院计划的患者决策辅助工具。

Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.

机构信息

, Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02679-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02679-1
PMID:35790912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9254531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient involvement in discharge planning of patients with stroke can be accomplished by providing personalized outcome information and promoting shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (PtDA) for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.

METHODS

A convergent mixed methods design was used, starting with needs assessments among patients with stroke and health care professionals (HCPs). Results of these assessments were used to develop the PtDA with integrated outcome information in several co-creation sessions. Subsequently, acceptability and usability were tested to optimize the PtDA. Development was guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 74 patients and 111 HCPs participated in this study. A three-component PtDA was developed, consisting of: 1) a printed consultation sheet to introduce the options for discharge destinations, containing information that can be specified for each individual patient; 2) an online information and deliberation tool to support patient education and clarification of patient values, containing an integrated "patients-like-me" model with outcome information about discharge destinations; 3) a summary sheet to support actual decision-making during consultation, containing the patient's values and preferences concerning discharge planning. In the acceptability test, all qualifying and certifying IPDAS criteria were fulfilled. The usability test showed that patients and HCPs highly appreciated the PtDA with integrated outcome information.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed PtDA was found acceptable and usable by patients and HCPs and is currently under investigation in a clinical trial to determine its effectiveness.

摘要

背景

通过提供个性化的预后信息和促进共同决策,患者可以参与脑卒中患者的出院计划。本研究旨在开发一种用于脑卒中住院患者出院计划的患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)。

方法

采用汇聚混合方法设计,首先在脑卒中患者和卫生保健专业人员(HCP)中进行需求评估。这些评估的结果用于在几个共同创作会议中开发具有综合预后信息的 PtDA。随后,对可接受性和可用性进行测试以优化 PtDA。开发过程遵循国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)标准。

结果

共有 74 名患者和 111 名 HCP 参与了这项研究。开发了一个由三部分组成的 PtDA,包括:1)一张介绍出院目的地选择的印刷咨询表,包含可针对每个患者具体指定的信息;2)一个支持患者教育和澄清患者价值观的在线信息和审议工具,包含一个具有出院目的地预后信息的集成“像我这样的患者”模型;3)一份支持咨询期间实际决策的总结表,包含患者对出院计划的价值观和偏好。在可接受性测试中,所有合格和认证的 IPDAS 标准都得到了满足。可用性测试表明,患者和 HCP 高度赞赏具有综合预后信息的 PtDA。

结论

开发的 PtDA 被患者和 HCP 认为是可接受和可用的,目前正在临床试验中进行有效性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/dea6a43f02be/12883_2022_2679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/a1467cdb09e0/12883_2022_2679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/9b639510e17d/12883_2022_2679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/dea6a43f02be/12883_2022_2679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/a1467cdb09e0/12883_2022_2679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/9b639510e17d/12883_2022_2679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dfc/9254531/dea6a43f02be/12883_2022_2679_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.开发一种针对住院脑卒中患者出院计划的患者决策辅助工具。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02679-1.
2
Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.使用以用户为中心的设计方法开发一种基于网络的患者决策辅助工具,用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5.
3
Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design.通过个性化复发风险计算支持乳腺癌术后监测的共同决策:结合国际患者决策辅助工具标准制定流程和混合方法设计开发患者决策辅助工具
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Nov 14;8(4):e38088. doi: 10.2196/38088.
4
Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions.开发一种在线患者决策辅助工具,用于治疗肾衰竭治疗方式的决策。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jul 6;23(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02853-0.
5
User-Centered Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Choice of Early Abortion Method: Multi-Cycle Mixed Methods Study.以患者为中心开发早期流产方法选择决策辅助工具:多周期混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 16;26:e48793. doi: 10.2196/48793.
6
Development and usability testing of a patient decision aid for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.新发复发型多发性硬化症患者决策辅助工具的开发与可用性测试
BMC Neurol. 2019 Jul 20;19(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1382-7.
7
A 'combined framework' approach to developing a patient decision aid: the PANDAs model.一种用于开发患者决策辅助工具的“综合框架”方法:熊猫模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:503. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0503-7.
8
A shared decision-making intervention between health care professionals and individuals undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An iterative development process with qualitative methods.医疗专业人员与接受肺康复治疗的个体之间的共同决策干预:采用定性方法的迭代开发过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0307689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307689. eCollection 2024.
9
Involving women in personalised decision-making on mode of delivery after caesarean section: the development and pilot testing of a patient decision aid.让女性参与剖宫产术后分娩方式的个体化决策:患者决策辅助工具的制定和初步测试。
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):202-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12516.
10
Observational study of the development and evaluation of a fertility preservation patient decision aid for teenage and adult women diagnosed with cancer: the Cancer, Fertility and Me research protocol.针对被诊断患有癌症的青少年及成年女性的生育力保存患者决策辅助工具的开发与评估的观察性研究:癌症、生育力与我研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 13;7(3):e013219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013219.

引用本文的文献

1
Situation analysis of implementation of the SMART safe discharge protocol: a study from East Guilan, Iran.SMART安全出院协议实施情况分析:来自伊朗吉兰省东部的一项研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 21;24(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03069-x.
2
A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.患者和公众参与实证性卒中研究的范围综述。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(9):962-972. doi: 10.1177/17474930241262638. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
3
Use of co-design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
The new strategic agenda for value transformation.新的价值转化战略议程。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 Aug;35(3):189-193. doi: 10.1177/09514848211011739. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Enablers and barriers in hospital-to-home transitional care for stroke survivors and caregivers: A systematic review.卒中幸存者及其照护者医院-家庭过渡性护理的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2786-2807. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15807. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.
使用共同设计方法学开发心血管疾病二级预防干预措施:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):16-29. doi: 10.1111/hex.13633. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
4
Effectiveness and implementation of SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information among patients with breast cancer, stroke and advanced kidney disease: SHOUT study protocol of multiple interrupted time series.基于结局信息的共享决策支持在乳腺癌、中风和晚期肾病患者中的效果及实施:一项多组间中断时间序列研究的 SHOUT 方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):e055324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055324.
心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step.中风服务中上肢能力恢复情况的计算机化患者特异性预测:下一步
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 21;92(6):574-81. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637.
5
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study.全球心血管疾病负担及危险因素, 1990-2019:来自 GBD 2019 研究的更新。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
6
Stroke prognostication for discharge planning with machine learning: A derivation study.基于机器学习的出院计划中风预后预测:一项推导研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;79:100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.046. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
7
Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估心房颤动患者卒中预防的共同决策:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1215-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2908.
8
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders.多病症卒中幸存者决策辅助工具的协同设计:英国关键利益攸关方参与的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e030385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030385.
10
Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review.决策冲突量表使用 20 多年:周年回顾。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):301-314. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19851345. Epub 2019 May 29.