• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非医学因素对烧伤患者早期死亡的影响:国家烧伤资料库研究。

Nonmedical Factors Influencing Early Deaths in Burns: A Study of the National Burn Repository.

机构信息

Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2020 Jan 30;41(1):3-7. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz139.

DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irz139
PMID:31420652
Abstract

It is well-established that survival in burn injury is primarily dependent on three factors: age, percent total-body surface area burned (%TBSA), and inhalation injury. However, it is clear that in other (nonburn) conditions, nonmedical factors may influence mortality. Even in severe burns, patients undergoing resuscitation may survive for a period of time before succumbing to infection or other complications. In some cases, though, families in conjunction with caregivers may choose to withdraw care and not resuscitate patients with large burns. We wanted to investigate whether any nonmedical socioeconomic factors influenced the rate of early deaths in burn patients. The National Burn Repository (NBR) was used to identify patients that died in the first 72 hours after injury and those that survived more than 72 hours. Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to examine factors including age, gender, race, comorbidities, burn size, inhalation injury, and insurance type, and determine their influence on deaths within 72 hours. A total of 133,889 burn patients were identified, 1362 of which died in the first 72 hours. As expected, the Baux score (age plus burn size), and inhalation injury predicted early deaths. Interestingly, on multivariate analysis, patients with Medicare (p = .002), self-pay patients (p < .001), and those covered by automobile policies (p = .045) were significantly more likely to die early than those with commercial insurance. Medicaid patients were more likely to die early, but not significantly (p = .188). Worker's compensation patients were more likely to survive the first 72 hours compared with patients with commercial insurance (p < .001). Men were more likely to survive the early period than women (p = .043). On analysis by race, only Hispanic patients significantly differed from white patients, and Hispanics were more likely to survive the first 72 hours (p = .028). Traditional medical factors are major factors in early burn deaths. However, these results show that nonmedical socioeconomic factors including race, gender, and especially insurance status influence early burn deaths as well.

摘要

众所周知,烧伤患者的存活率主要取决于三个因素:年龄、总体表面积烧伤百分比(%TBSA)和吸入性损伤。然而,很明显,在其他(非烧伤)情况下,非医疗因素可能会影响死亡率。即使在严重烧伤的情况下,接受复苏的患者也可能在因感染或其他并发症而死亡之前存活一段时间。然而,在某些情况下,患者的家属和护理人员可能会选择停止治疗,不复苏大面积烧伤的患者。我们想调查是否有任何非医疗社会经济因素影响烧伤患者的早期死亡率。国家烧伤资料库(NBR)用于识别在受伤后 72 小时内死亡和存活超过 72 小时的患者。使用单变量和多变量回归分析检查了包括年龄、性别、种族、合并症、烧伤面积、吸入性损伤和保险类型在内的因素,并确定了它们对 72 小时内死亡的影响。共确定了 133889 例烧伤患者,其中 1362 例在头 72 小时内死亡。正如预期的那样,Baux 评分(年龄加烧伤面积)和吸入性损伤预测了早期死亡。有趣的是,在多变量分析中,医疗保险(p =.002)、自费患者(p <.001)和汽车保险覆盖的患者(p =.045)比商业保险患者更早死亡的可能性显著更高。医疗补助患者更早死亡的可能性更大,但不显著(p =.188)。与商业保险患者相比,工人补偿患者更有可能在头 72 小时内存活(p <.001)。男性比女性更有可能在早期存活(p =.043)。按种族分析,只有西班牙裔患者与白人患者有显著差异,西班牙裔患者更有可能在头 72 小时内存活(p =.028)。传统的医疗因素是早期烧伤死亡的主要因素。然而,这些结果表明,非医疗社会经济因素,包括种族、性别,尤其是保险状况,也会影响早期烧伤死亡。

相似文献

1
Nonmedical Factors Influencing Early Deaths in Burns: A Study of the National Burn Repository.非医学因素对烧伤患者早期死亡的影响:国家烧伤资料库研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2020 Jan 30;41(1):3-7. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz139.
2
A National Study of the Effect of Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Gender on Burn Outcomes.一项关于种族、社会经济地位和性别对烧伤结局影响的全国性研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):161-168. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000416.
3
Racial disparities exist among burn patients despite insurance coverage.烧伤患者尽管有保险覆盖,但仍存在种族差异。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Hyperbaric Oxygen and Mortality in Burns With Inhalation Injury: A Study of the National Burn Repository.高压氧与吸入性损伤烧伤患者的死亡率:国家烧伤资料库研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Sep 30;42(5):900-904. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab105.
6
Early patient deaths after transfer to a regional burn center.患者转至区域烧伤中心后早期死亡。
Burns. 2020 Feb;46(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Burned patients who die from causes other than the burn affect the model used to predict mortality: a national exploratory study.因烧伤以外的原因死亡的烧伤患者会影响用于预测死亡率的模型:一项全国性探索性研究。
Burns. 2018 Mar;44(2):280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
8
Factors associated with acute kidney injury in the Helsinki Burn Centre in 2006-2015.2006-2015 年赫尔辛基烧伤中心急性肾损伤的相关因素。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 13;26(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0573-3.
9
Influence of demographics and inhalation injury on burn mortality in children.人口统计学因素和吸入性损伤对儿童烧伤死亡率的影响。
Burns. 2004 Feb;30(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2003.07.003.
10
The measured effect magnitude of co-morbidities on burn injury mortality.共病对烧伤死亡率的测量效应量。
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1433-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
REsource Support To Optimize REcovery (RESTORE) document study: Evaluating aftercare resources for burn survivors.优化康复资源支持(RESTORE)文件研究:评估烧伤幸存者的后续护理资源。
Burns. 2025 May;51(4):107399. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107399. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
2
[Comparative study of three scores in predicting the death risk of severe burn patients].[三种评分系统预测严重烧伤患者死亡风险的比较研究]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 20;38(2):184-189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201113-00473.
3
International Abstracts.
国际文摘
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020 Mar 31;33(1):85-86.