Suppr超能文献

内镜下胃造口术与外科胃造口术用于肠内营养的比较

Endoscopic vs surgical gastrostomy for enteral nutrition.

作者信息

Himal H S, Schumacher S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1987;1(1):33-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00703085.

Abstract

A retrospective review of 78 patients who had undergone endoscopic gastrostomy and 22 patients who had undergone Stamm gastrostomy was carried out. The mean operative time for the Stamm gastrostomy group was 63 min, while that for the endoscopic gastrostomy group was 26 min. One operative complication--bleeding--requiring reoperation occurred in the Stamm gastrostomy group. The incidences of aspiration, pneumonia, wound infection, and mortality were significantly higher in the Stamm gastrostomy group. We conclude that percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is the preferred technique for long-term enteral nutrition.

摘要

对78例行内镜下胃造口术的患者和22例行 Stamm 胃造口术的患者进行了回顾性研究。Stamm 胃造口术组的平均手术时间为63分钟,而内镜下胃造口术组为26分钟。Stamm 胃造口术组发生了1例需要再次手术的手术并发症——出血。Stamm 胃造口术组的吸入性肺炎、肺炎、伤口感染和死亡率显著更高。我们得出结论,经皮内镜下胃造口术是长期肠内营养的首选技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验