Suppr超能文献

在指定的姑息治疗床位提供姑息治疗的困难:一项探索性调查。

Difficulties in providing palliative care in identified palliative care beds: An exploratory survey.

作者信息

Calvel Laurent, Blondet Loup V, Chedotal Isabelle, Grosshans Daniel, Lefebvre François, Mounier Geeta, Mangin Elisabeth, Kopferschmitt Marie Christine

机构信息

University hospital of Strasbourg, hôpital de Hautepierre, department of palliative and supportive care, équipe mobile de soins d'accompagnement, de soins de support et de soins palliatifs, 1, avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg cedex, France; University hospital of Strasbourg, hôpital Civil, department of palliative and supportive care, unité de soins d'accompagnement, de soins de support et de soins Palliatifs, chirurgie B, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France.

University hospital of Strasbourg, hôpital Civil, department of palliative and supportive care, unité de soins d'accompagnement, de soins de support et de soins Palliatifs, chirurgie B, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France.

出版信息

Presse Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;48(7-8 Pt 1):e209-e215. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2018.10.020. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

Abstract

AIM

Identified Palliative Care Beds (Lits Identifiés Soins Palliatifs - LISPs) is a French specificity. Primarily created to integrate palliative care culture into conventional hospital units, the relevance of this measure became a controversial issue. Nowadays, hospital teams continue to frequently encounter complex situations regarding medical care for palliative patients. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study, a quantitative one, bridging the gap about that subject. It showed failure in practicing palliative care work around LISP. Our study is based on a qualitative method that complements the quantitative study. It aimed to describe difficulties that limit palliative care practices in managing adult patients in LISP.

METHOD

This qualitative exploratory survey was conducted with a sample of health service professionals (n=20), from senior physicians to caregivers. Each semi-structured interview included open questions regarding their experiences, feelings and difficulties with palliative care practices on LISP. It also included closed questions concerning interviewee's demographics and career course. The data for this research were submitted to a two-stage analysis: first, a global review of each interview was performed to identify trends. Then, a detailed breakdown, question by question, was implemented.

RESULTS

From a quantitative perspective, the interviews revealed 305 difficulties, indicating the gaps and barriers limiting the implementation of a palliative approach in these services. From a qualitative perspective, five topics raised our attention by their recurrence in discourses: (1) partial knowledge about palliative care definition and legislation mostly due to a lack of training; (2) need for time; (3) need for human resources; (4) need for communication; (5) hard time in transitioning from curative to palliative care.

PERSPECTIVE

This survey gives the opportunity to understand health service professionals' difficulties in practicing palliative care in conventional medical services. It raises the central issue of the pricing reform on the health institutes activity. It also provides angles of inquiry to improve LISP effectiveness. This qualitative and descriptive study was designed to explore difficulties in practicing palliative care around LISP. Nevertheless, according to the size of the sample, results will need to be confirmed by a more extensive qualitative survey.

摘要

目的

“识别姑息治疗床位”(法语为Lits Identifiés Soins Palliatifs,简称LISPs)是法国特有的一项举措。该举措最初旨在将姑息治疗文化融入传统医院科室,但这项措施的相关性已成为一个有争议的问题。如今,医院团队在为姑息治疗患者提供医疗服务时仍经常遇到复杂情况。据我们所知,关于这一主题仅有一项定量研究,填补了该领域的空白。该研究表明在围绕“识别姑息治疗床位”开展姑息治疗工作方面存在不足。我们的研究基于定性方法,对定量研究起到补充作用。其目的是描述在管理LISPs中的成年患者时限制姑息治疗实践的困难。

方法

这项定性探索性调查以20名卫生服务专业人员为样本进行,从资深医生到护理人员。每次半结构化访谈都包含关于他们在LISPs上进行姑息治疗实践的经历、感受和困难的开放性问题。还包括关于受访者人口统计学和职业历程的封闭式问题。本研究的数据进行了两阶段分析:首先,对每次访谈进行全面审查以确定趋势。然后,逐题进行详细分类。

结果

从定量角度来看,访谈揭示了305个困难,表明存在限制这些服务中姑息治疗方法实施的差距和障碍。从定性角度来看,五个主题因其在访谈中反复出现而引起我们的关注:(1)对姑息治疗定义和法规的部分了解,主要是由于缺乏培训;(2)需要时间;(3)需要人力资源;(4)需要沟通;(5)从治愈性治疗过渡到姑息治疗困难。

展望

这项调查让我们有机会了解卫生服务专业人员在传统医疗服务中开展姑息治疗的困难。它提出了卫生机构活动定价改革的核心问题。还提供了提高LISPs有效性的探究角度。这项定性描述性研究旨在探索围绕LISPs开展姑息治疗的困难。然而,根据样本规模,结果需要通过更广泛的定性调查来证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验