General Motors Company, Warren, MI, USA.
NIOSH Taft Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2019 Nov;81:102897. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102897. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
The interpretation of the calculated result of the revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE) has been problematic because the relationship of the calculated result to back injury risk has not always been either well understood nor consistently interpreted. During the revision of the ISO standard 11228-1 (Manual lifting, lowering and carrying), an extensive literature review was conducted on validation studies of the RNLE. A systematic review of exposure-risk associations between the LI metrics and various low-back health outcomes from peer-reviewed epidemiological studies was conducted. Risk interpretations for different levels of calculated result of the RNLE are added to the ISO standard. Rationale for the risk interpretations is presented in this paper.
修订后的 NIOSH 举升方程(RNLE)的计算结果的解释一直存在问题,因为计算结果与背部损伤风险的关系要么理解不透彻,要么解释不一致。在 ISO 标准 11228-1(手动升降和搬运)的修订过程中,对 RNLE 的验证研究进行了广泛的文献回顾。对同行评议的流行病学研究中 LI 指标与各种下背部健康结果之间的暴露-风险关联进行了系统回顾。将 RNLE 的不同计算结果水平的风险解释添加到 ISO 标准中。本文介绍了风险解释的依据。