• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速干预是否能预防后期精神病症状?

Does the Fast Track Intervention Prevent Later Psychosis Symptoms?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.

BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1255-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01041-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-019-01041-1
PMID:31422489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6883128/
Abstract

The Fast Track (FT) intervention was a multimodal preventive intervention addressing antisocial development across 10 years of childhood and early adolescence. The intervention included parent management training, child social-cognitive skills training, peer coaching and mentoring, academic skills tutoring, and a classroom social-emotional learning program. While not specifically designed to target psychosis symptoms (e.g., social withdrawal, thought abnormalities), the present study aimed to examine whether the FT intervention prevented psychosis symptoms through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. Participants included the FT intervention and high-risk control samples (N = 891; 69% male; M age = 6.58 years, SD = .48). Psychosis symptoms were assessed using the "thought problems" subscale of the parent-report Child Behavior Checklist during grades 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7, and the self-report Adult Behavior Checklist at age 25 years, in line with prior research using this measure. Growth models included the FT condition and covariates (i.e., initial risk screen score, cohort, socioeconomic status, rural/urban status, race, and sex) as predictors; and child, adolescent, and adult psychosis symptoms as outcomes. Intervention status was not significantly associated with the slope of psychosis symptoms; however, after controlling for concurrent cannabis use, intervention participants reported lower levels of psychosis symptoms over time. Findings suggest that interventions targeting antisocial behavior may prevent psychosis symptoms in the long term.

摘要

快速通道(FT)干预是一种多模式预防干预措施,针对儿童和青少年早期的 10 年反社会发展。该干预措施包括家长管理培训、儿童社会认知技能培训、同伴指导和辅导、学术技能辅导以及课堂社会情感学习计划。虽然干预措施并非专门针对精神病症状(例如社交退缩、思维异常),但本研究旨在探讨 FT 干预是否可以预防精神病症状,从儿童期到青春期再到成年期。参与者包括 FT 干预组和高风险对照组(n=891;69%为男性;平均年龄=6.58 岁,标准差=0.48)。精神病症状使用父母报告的儿童行为检查表的“思维问题”子量表在 1、2、4、5 和 7 年级评估,以及 25 岁时的自我报告成人行为检查表评估,这与之前使用该措施的研究一致。增长模型包括 FT 条件和协变量(即初始风险筛查得分、队列、社会经济地位、农村/城市地位、种族和性别)作为预测因素;儿童、青少年和成年精神病症状作为结果。干预状态与精神病症状的斜率无显著相关性;然而,在控制同期大麻使用后,干预组报告的精神病症状随时间推移逐渐降低。研究结果表明,针对反社会行为的干预措施可能会从长远预防精神病症状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/6883128/56626681cd3a/nihms-1055829-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/6883128/0110d4b36197/nihms-1055829-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/6883128/56626681cd3a/nihms-1055829-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/6883128/0110d4b36197/nihms-1055829-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c59/6883128/56626681cd3a/nihms-1055829-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Does the Fast Track Intervention Prevent Later Psychosis Symptoms?快速干预是否能预防后期精神病症状?
Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1255-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01041-1.
2
Indirect Effects of the Fast Track Intervention on Conduct Disorder Symptoms and Callous-Unemotional Traits: Distinct Pathways Involving Discipline and Warmth.快速通道干预对品行障碍症状和冷酷无情特质的间接影响:涉及纪律和温暖的不同途径。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Apr;44(3):587-97. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0059-y.
3
Fast track randomized controlled trial to prevent externalizing psychiatric disorders: findings from grades 3 to 9.预防外化性精神障碍的快速通道随机对照试验:3至9年级的研究结果
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;46(10):1250-1262. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31813e5d39.
4
Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.针对品行问题的快速预防试验的初步影响:I. 高风险样本。品行问题预防研究小组。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Oct;67(5):631-47.
5
The effects of the fast track preventive intervention on the development of conduct disorder across childhood.快速通道预防干预对儿童期品行障碍发展的影响。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):331-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01558.x.
6
Social-information-processing patterns mediate the impact of preventive intervention on adolescent antisocial behavior.社会信息处理模式中介了预防干预对青少年反社会行为的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):456-65. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457394. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
Testosterone reactivity to provocation mediates the effect of early intervention on aggressive behavior.睾酮对刺激的反应性介导了早期干预对攻击行为的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797614525642. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Impact of the fast track prevention program on health services use by conduct-problem youth.行为问题青少年快速通道预防计划对卫生服务利用的影响。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):e130-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0322. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
9
Merging universal and indicated prevention programs: the Fast Track model. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.整合普遍预防和针对性预防项目:快车道模型。行为问题预防研究小组。
Addict Behav. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):913-27. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00120-9.
10
High School Sports Involvement Diminishes the Association Between Childhood Conduct Disorder and Adult Antisocial Behavior.高中体育活动参与减少了儿童期品行障碍与成人反社会行为之间的关联。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1):107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Impulsivity profiles across five harmonized longitudinal childhood preventive interventions and associations with adult outcomes.五项协调一致的儿童纵向预防性干预措施中的冲动性概况及其与成人结局的关联。
Dev Psychopathol. 2025 May;37(2):990-1003. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424000828. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
2
Psychosis Symptom Trajectories Across Childhood and Adolescence in Three Longitudinal Studies: An Integrative Data Analysis with Mixture Modeling.精神症状轨迹在三个纵向研究中的儿童期和青春期:混合建模的综合数据分析。
Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1636-1647. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01581-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis.缺乏支持针对精神病采取特定预防干预措施的证据:一项网状Meta分析。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):196-209. doi: 10.1002/wps.20526.
2
CBT in the prevention of psychosis and other severe mental disorders in patients with an at risk mental state: A review and proposed next steps.认知行为疗法(CBT)在预防处于高危精神状态的患者出现精神病和其他严重精神障碍中的应用:综述及下一步建议。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Cannabis and psychotic experiences.
大麻与精神病体验。
Addiction. 2017 Sep;112(9):1688-1689. doi: 10.1111/add.13885. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
Marijuana use in the immediate 5-year premorbid period is associated with increased risk of onset of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders.在病前5年近期使用大麻与精神分裂症及相关精神障碍发病风险增加有关。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Mar;171(1-3):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
5
Indirect Effects of the Fast Track Intervention on Conduct Disorder Symptoms and Callous-Unemotional Traits: Distinct Pathways Involving Discipline and Warmth.快速通道干预对品行障碍症状和冷酷无情特质的间接影响:涉及纪律和温暖的不同途径。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Apr;44(3):587-97. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0059-y.
6
Adolescent Initiation of Cannabis Use and Early-Onset Psychosis.青少年开始使用大麻与早发性精神病
Subst Abus. 2015;36(4):524-33. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2014.995332.
7
Social cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: A meta-analysis.前驱期精神病的社会认知功能:一项荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
8
Effects of multidimensional treatment foster care on psychotic symptoms in girls.多维治疗寄养对女孩精神病症状的影响。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Impact of early intervention on psychopathology, crime, and well-being at age 25.早期干预对25岁时精神病理学、犯罪及幸福感的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;172(1):59-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13060786. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Psychosis risk screening in clinical high-risk adolescents: a longitudinal investigation using the Child Behavior Checklist.临床高危青少年的精神病风险筛查:一项使用儿童行为检查表的纵向调查。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Oct;159(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.046. Epub 2014 Aug 27.