University of South Carolina.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Jan 3;25(1):68-79. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz025.
Home literacy practices reported by parents of preschool children with hearing loss were compared to those reported by parents of their peers with typical hearing. Parents completed a questionnaire from Boudreau, D. (2005. Use of a parent questionnaire in emergent and early literacy assessment of preschool children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 33-47. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/004)) assessing home literacy practices across areas such as parent facilitation of literacy and time spent reading per week. As part of a larger study, children completed language and emergent literacy assessments. Parents of both groups reported similar amounts of time spent reading to their children and scored similarly on report of parent facilitation of literacy, even though children with hearing loss scored lower on measures of emergent literacy. However, parents of children with typical hearing reported that their children had higher engagement and interest in books than children with hearing loss. Additionally, only child engagement with books was correlated with emergent literacy skills and only for children with hearing loss. The results suggest that parent facilitation of literacy alone is not correlated with emergent literacy scores; children must take an active role in their reading development. Children with hearing loss must be active participants during shared book reading. It is therefore essential to develop ways to actively engage children with hearing loss during reading activities.
家长报告的家庭读写实践 (听力损失的学前儿童与典型听力的学前儿童相比) 由家长完成问卷 (博德,D. (2005. 使用家长问卷在学前儿童读写评估的新兴和早期。语言,言语和听力服务在学校,36,33-47. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2005/004))评估家庭读写实践在父母促进读写和每周阅读时间等方面。作为一个更大的研究的一部分,儿童完成语言和新兴读写评估。两组家长报告的阅读时间相似,父母促进读写的报告得分也相似,尽管听力损失的儿童在新兴读写方面的得分较低。然而,有典型听力的儿童的父母报告说,他们的孩子对书籍的参与度和兴趣比听力损失的孩子高。此外,只有儿童与书籍的互动与新兴读写技能相关,而且仅适用于听力损失的儿童。结果表明,父母促进读写本身与新兴读写成绩无关;孩子必须在阅读发展中发挥积极作用。听力损失的儿童在共享阅读时必须是积极的参与者。因此,必须开发在阅读活动中积极吸引听力损失儿童的方法。