International Clinical Competency Committees: Maximizing Value for Faculty, Residents, and the Program.
作者信息
Edgar Laura, Holmboe Eric
出版信息
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4 Suppl):191-192. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00413.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
International Clinical Competency Committees: Maximizing Value for Faculty, Residents, and the Program.国际临床能力委员会：为教师、住院医师和项目实现价值最大化。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4 Suppl):191-192. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00413.
2
Evaluation of residents, faculty, and program.住院医师、教员和项目评估。
Acad Radiol. 2003 Feb;10 Suppl 1:S35-43. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80148-4.
3
Direct Observation: Assessing Orthopaedic Trainee Competence in the Ambulatory Setting.直接观察：评估骨科实习生在门诊环境中的能力。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Sep;24(9):591-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00401.
4
Initial performance of a modified milestones global evaluation tool for semiannual evaluation of residents by faculty.教员对半年度住院医师评估的改良里程碑全球评估工具的初步表现。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):739-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.08.004.
5
Involving ophthalmology departmental stakeholders in developing workplace-based assessment tools.让眼科部门利益相关者参与开发基于工作场所的评估工具。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;54(5):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Global assessment tool for emergency medicine-specific core competency evaluation.急诊医学特定核心能力评估的全球评估工具。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1370; author reply 1370-1. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.029.
7
How Do Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Structure Their Clinical Competency Committees? A Survey.急诊医学住院医师培训项目如何构建其临床能力委员会？一项调查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;22(11):1351-4. doi: 10.1111/acem.12804. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
8
Periodic progress evaluation.定期进展评估。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2004;90:77-95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0633-4_12.
9
The European examination--its present status and potential development.欧洲的考试——其现状与潜在发展。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2004;90:107-14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0633-4_15.
10
Successful Implementation of a Direct Observation Program in an Ambulatory Block Rotation.门诊轮转中直接观察项目的成功实施
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Feb;9(1):113-117. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00167.1.
引用本文的文献
1
Challenges and Solutions in Running Effective Clinical Competency Committees in the International Context.在国际背景下运行有效的临床能力委员会所面临的挑战与解决方案
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2 Suppl):70-74. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00844.1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
2
Psychiatry Milestones 2.0: Using the Supplemental Guide to Create a Shared Model of the Development of Professional Identity and Expertise.《精神病学里程碑2.0：使用补充指南创建专业身份与专业技能发展的共享模型》
Acad Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;45(4):500-505. doi: 10.1007/s40596-021-01455-6. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Transforming Resident Assessment: An Analysis Using Deming's System of Profound Knowledge.转变居民评估：运用戴明的渊博知识体系进行分析。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):195-201. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002499.
2
Thresholds and interpretations: How clinical competency committees identify pediatric residents with performance concerns.阈值和解释：临床能力委员会如何识别表现不佳的儿科住院医师。
Med Teach. 2018 Jan;40(1):70-79. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1394576.
3
A Multicenter Prospective Comparison of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment.毕业后医学教育认证委员会里程碑的多中心前瞻性比较：临床能力委员会与住院医师自我评估
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e8-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
Reviewing residents' competence: a qualitative study of the role of clinical competency committees in performance assessment.评估住院医师的能力：关于临床能力委员会在绩效评估中作用的定性研究
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1084-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000736.
Zotero 插件