Suppr超能文献

阈值和解释:临床能力委员会如何识别表现不佳的儿科住院医师。

Thresholds and interpretations: How clinical competency committees identify pediatric residents with performance concerns.

机构信息

a Department of Pediatrics , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA.

b Department of Pediatrics , Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine , Boston , MA , USA.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2018 Jan;40(1):70-79. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1394576.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical competency committee (CCC) identification of residents with performance concerns is critical for early intervention.

METHODS

Program directors and 94 CCC members at 14 pediatric residency programs responded to a written survey prompt asking them to describe how they identify residents with performance concerns. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Six themes emerged from analysis and were grouped into two domains. The first domain included four themes, each describing a path through which residents could meet or exceed a concern threshold:1) written comments from rotation assessments are foundational in identifying residents with performance concerns, 2) concerning performance extremes stand out, 3) isolated data points may accumulate to raise concern, and 4) developmental trajectory matters. The second domain focused on how CCC members and program directors interpret data to make decisions about residents with concerns and contained 2 themes: 1) using norm- and/or criterion-referenced interpretation, and 2) assessing the quality of the data that is reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying residents with performance concerns is important for their education and the care they provide. This study delineates strategies used by CCC members across several programs for identifying these residents, which may be helpful for other CCCs to consider in their efforts.

摘要

背景

临床能力委员会(CCC)识别表现不佳的住院医师对于早期干预至关重要。

方法

14 个儿科住院医师培训项目的项目主任和 94 名 CCC 成员对一项书面调查提示做出了回应,要求他们描述如何识别表现不佳的住院医师。使用主题分析对数据进行了分析。

结果

分析产生了 6 个主题,并分为两个领域。第一个领域包括 4 个主题,每个主题都描述了一种途径,通过该途径,住院医师可以达到或超过关注阈值:1)轮转评估的书面意见是识别表现不佳的住院医师的基础,2)表现极端引人注目,3)孤立的数据点可能会累积引起关注,4)发展轨迹很重要。第二个领域侧重于 CCC 成员和项目主任如何解释数据,以对有问题的住院医师做出决策,包含 2 个主题:1)使用基于标准和/或基于准则的解释,2)评估所审查数据的质量。

结论

识别表现不佳的住院医师对于他们的教育和他们提供的护理很重要。本研究描绘了几个项目的 CCC 成员用于识别这些住院医师的策略,这可能有助于其他 CCC 在他们的努力中考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验