Ravussin P, Abou-Madi M, Archer D, Chiolero R, Freeman J, Trop D, De Tribolet N
Department of Anaesthesia, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Neurosurg. 1988 Dec;69(6):869-76. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.6.0869.
In view of the current concern that rapid infusion of mannitol might initially aggravate intracranial hypertension, the effects of a mannitol infusion on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) were investigated in 49 patients. The studies were performed when the patients were under general anesthesia prior to elective craniotomy for tumor resection or intracerebral aneurysm clipping. The patients were divided into two groups: 24 patients with normal CSFP (Group I, mean CSFP 10.5 mm Hg) and 25 with raised CSFP (Group II, mean CSFP 20.8 mm Hg). Measurements of CSFP, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), and central venous pressure (CVP) were made serially during and after the infusion of 20% mannitol (1 gm.kg-1 infused over a 10-minute interval). In both groups, mannitol infusion provoked a fall in MABP and an increase in CVP. An immediate decrease [corrected] in CSFP was observed in Group II, whereas CSFP increased transiently but significantly in Group I. Analysis of the arterial and venous driving pressures which contribute to CSFP suggests that the transient increase in CSFP after mannitol in Group I was partly due to the increase in CVP. The presence of intracranial hypertension may thus alter the CSFP response to arterial and venous pressure changes. Cerebral blood volume (CBV) was measured in dogs in a separate study analogous to the human protocol. The CBV increased approximately 25% over control values after mannitol infusion both in the normal animals and in those with CSFP raised by an epidural balloon. The response of the CSFP to mannitol infusion differed between both groups in a fashion similar to that observed in the human subjects. Thus, differences in CBV changes after mannitol do not account for the difference in CSFP response between normal subjects and those with raised CSFP.
鉴于目前担心快速输注甘露醇可能最初会加重颅内高压,我们对49例患者研究了输注甘露醇对腰段脑脊液压力(CSFP)的影响。这些研究是在患者接受全身麻醉下,于择期开颅肿瘤切除或颅内动脉瘤夹闭术前进行的。患者分为两组:24例CSFP正常的患者(I组,平均CSFP 10.5 mmHg)和25例CSFP升高的患者(II组,平均CSFP 20.8 mmHg)。在输注20%甘露醇(1 g·kg⁻¹在10分钟内输注完毕)期间及之后,连续测量CSFP、平均动脉血压(MABP)和中心静脉压(CVP)。在两组中,输注甘露醇均引起MABP下降和CVP升高。在II组观察到CSFP立即下降[校正后],而在I组CSFP短暂但显著升高。对促成CSFP的动脉和静脉驱动压力的分析表明,I组输注甘露醇后CSFP的短暂升高部分归因于CVP的升高。因此,颅内高压的存在可能会改变CSFP对动脉和静脉压力变化的反应。在一项类似于人体方案的单独研究中,对犬的脑血容量(CBV)进行了测量。在正常动物和硬膜外气囊使CSFP升高的动物中,输注甘露醇后CBV均比对照值增加约25%。两组中CSFP对甘露醇输注的反应不同,其方式与在人体观察到的相似。因此,甘露醇后CBV变化的差异并不能解释正常受试者与CSFP升高者之间CSFP反应的差异。