• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习同步:生物制剂如何耦合神经任务模块以应对稳定性-可塑性困境。

Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Aug 20;15(8):e1006604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006604. eCollection 2019 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006604
PMID:31430280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6716678/
Abstract

We provide a novel computational framework on how biological and artificial agents can learn to flexibly couple and decouple neural task modules for cognitive processing. In this way, they can address the stability-plasticity dilemma. For this purpose, we combine two prominent computational neuroscience principles, namely Binding by Synchrony and Reinforcement Learning. The model learns to synchronize task-relevant modules, while also learning to desynchronize currently task-irrelevant modules. As a result, old (but currently task-irrelevant) information is protected from overwriting (stability) while new information can be learned quickly in currently task-relevant modules (plasticity). We combine learning to synchronize with task modules that learn via one of several classical learning algorithms (Rescorla-Wagner, backpropagation, Boltzmann machines). The resulting combined model is tested on a reversal learning paradigm where it must learn to switch between three different task rules. We demonstrate that our combined model has significant computational advantages over the original network without synchrony, in terms of both stability and plasticity. Importantly, the resulting models' processing dynamics are also consistent with empirical data and provide empirically testable hypotheses for future MEG/EEG studies.

摘要

我们提供了一个新的计算框架,用于研究生物和人工代理如何学习灵活地耦合和去耦神经任务模块,以进行认知处理。通过这种方式,它们可以解决稳定性-可塑性困境。为此,我们结合了两个突出的计算神经科学原则,即同步绑定和强化学习。该模型学会了同步任务相关模块,同时也学会了去同步当前任务不相关的模块。结果,旧的(但当前任务不相关)信息受到保护,不会被覆盖(稳定性),而新的信息可以在当前任务相关的模块中快速学习(可塑性)。我们将同步学习与通过几种经典学习算法(Rescorla-Wagner、反向传播、玻尔兹曼机)学习的任务模块相结合。在一个反转学习范例中,对得到的组合模型进行了测试,该范例必须学习在三个不同的任务规则之间切换。我们证明,与没有同步的原始网络相比,我们的组合模型在稳定性和可塑性方面都具有显著的计算优势。重要的是,得到的模型的处理动力学也与经验数据一致,并为未来的 MEG/EEG 研究提供了可经验检验的假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/0c2e10db58dd/pcbi.1006604.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/bb417f41f66d/pcbi.1006604.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/fa67ccd2c2a5/pcbi.1006604.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/73cc4d738df5/pcbi.1006604.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/57f7b04ad0ad/pcbi.1006604.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/8b6768e46211/pcbi.1006604.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/b8e619ee2ce8/pcbi.1006604.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/82c6ce2890f8/pcbi.1006604.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/0c2e10db58dd/pcbi.1006604.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/bb417f41f66d/pcbi.1006604.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/fa67ccd2c2a5/pcbi.1006604.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/73cc4d738df5/pcbi.1006604.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/57f7b04ad0ad/pcbi.1006604.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/8b6768e46211/pcbi.1006604.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/b8e619ee2ce8/pcbi.1006604.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/82c6ce2890f8/pcbi.1006604.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5647/6716678/0c2e10db58dd/pcbi.1006604.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma.学习同步:生物制剂如何耦合神经任务模块以应对稳定性-可塑性困境。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Aug 20;15(8):e1006604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006604. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
Evolving interpretable plasticity for spiking networks.用于脉冲神经网络的不断发展的可解释可塑性。
Elife. 2021 Oct 28;10:e66273. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66273.
3
A Reservoir Computing Model of Reward-Modulated Motor Learning and Automaticity.一种基于奖励调节的运动学习和自动化的储层计算模型。
Neural Comput. 2019 Jul;31(7):1430-1461. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01198. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
A solution to the learning dilemma for recurrent networks of spiking neurons.用于尖峰神经元递归网络的学习困境的解决方案。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 17;11(1):3625. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17236-y.
5
Learning to Synchronize: Midfrontal Theta Dynamics during Rule Switching.学习同步:规则切换过程中的额中Theta 动力学。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 17;41(7):1516-1528. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-20.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
6
Neural modularity helps organisms evolve to learn new skills without forgetting old skills.神经模块化有助于生物体进化,以便在不遗忘旧技能的情况下学习新技能。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Apr 2;11(4):e1004128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004128. eCollection 2015 Apr.
7
Astrocytes as a mechanism for contextually-guided network dynamics and function.星形胶质细胞作为一种介导上下文引导的网络动态和功能的机制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 31;20(5):e1012186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012186. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Mirrored STDP Implements Autoencoder Learning in a Network of Spiking Neurons.镜像脉冲时间依赖可塑性在脉冲神经元网络中实现自动编码器学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Dec 3;11(12):e1004566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004566. eCollection 2015 Dec.
9
A Scalable Weight-Free Learning Algorithm for Regulatory Control of Cell Activity in Spiking Neuronal Networks.一种用于尖峰神经元网络中细胞活动调节控制的可扩展无权重学习算法。
Int J Neural Syst. 2018 Mar;28(2):1750015. doi: 10.1142/S0129065717500150. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
10
Synergies between intrinsic and synaptic plasticity based on information theoretic learning.基于信息论学习的内在和突触可塑性协同作用。
PLoS One. 2013 May 9;8(5):e62894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062894. Print 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Continual task learning in natural and artificial agents.自然和人工代理中的持续任务学习。
Trends Neurosci. 2023 Mar;46(3):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Computational Investigations of Learning and Synchronization in Cognitive Control.认知控制中学习与同步的计算研究。
J Cogn. 2022 Sep 30;5(1):44. doi: 10.5334/joc.239. eCollection 2022.
3
Theta-phase connectivity between medial prefrontal and posterior areas underlies novel instructions implementation.内侧前额叶与后部区域之间的θ相位连接是新指令执行的基础。

本文引用的文献

1
Continual Learning Through Synaptic Intelligence.通过突触智能进行持续学习。
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2017;70:3987-3995.
2
Alleviating catastrophic forgetting using context-dependent gating and synaptic stabilization.利用上下文相关门控和突触稳定缓解灾难性遗忘。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):E10467-E10475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803839115. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
3
Dorsal anterior cingulate-brainstem ensemble as a reinforcement meta-learner.背侧前扣带回-脑干集合作为强化元学习器。
eNeuro. 2022 Jul 21;9(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0225-22.2022.
4
Learning when effort matters: neural dynamics underlying updating and adaptation to changes in performance efficacy.学习何时需要努力:表现效能变化时更新和适应的神经动力学基础。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Feb 20;33(5):2395-2411. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac215.
5
Theta oscillations shift towards optimal frequency for cognitive control.θ 振荡向认知控制的最佳频率移动。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jul;6(7):1000-1013. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01335-5. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Time-Based Binding as a Solution to and a Limitation for Flexible Cognition.基于时间的绑定作为灵活认知的一种解决方案和限制因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:798061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798061. eCollection 2021.
7
Professional decision making with digitalisation of patient contacts in a medical advice setting: a qualitative study of a pilot project with a chat programme in Sweden.数字化患者咨询中的专业决策:瑞典试点项目中聊天程序的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e054103. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054103.
8
Learning to Synchronize: Midfrontal Theta Dynamics during Rule Switching.学习同步:规则切换过程中的额中Theta 动力学。
J Neurosci. 2021 Feb 17;41(7):1516-1528. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-20.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Aug 24;14(8):e1006370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006370. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
Prefrontal cortex as a meta-reinforcement learning system.前额皮质作为一个元强化学习系统。
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Jun;21(6):860-868. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0147-8. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
Compositional clustering in task structure learning.任务结构学习中的组合聚类。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Apr 19;14(4):e1006116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006116. eCollection 2018 Apr.
6
Subjective Confidence Predicts Information Seeking in Decision Making.主观信心预测决策中的信息寻求。
Psychol Sci. 2018 May;29(5):761-778. doi: 10.1177/0956797617744771. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Within- and across-trial dynamics of human EEG reveal cooperative interplay between reinforcement learning and working memory.人类脑电图的试验内和试验间动态揭示了强化学习和工作记忆之间的协同相互作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2502-2507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720963115. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
8
Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks.克服神经网络中的灾难性遗忘。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 28;114(13):3521-3526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611835114. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Binding by Random Bursts: A Computational Model of Cognitive Control.随机突发绑定:一种认知控制的计算模型
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1103-1118. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01117. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
10
Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence.认知的节奏:通过连贯性进行交流。
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034.