Lockyer Evan J, Hosel Katarina, Nippard Anna P, Button Duane C, Power Kevin E
Human Neurophysiology Lab, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1C 5S7, Canada.
Brain Sci. 2019 Aug 19;9(8):205. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9080205.
: We examined corticospinal and spinal excitability across multiple power outputs during arm cycling using a weak and strong stimulus intensity. : We elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) in the biceps brachii using magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex and electrical stimulation of corticospinal axons during arm cycling at six different power outputs (i.e., 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 W) and two stimulation intensities (i.e., weak vs. strong). : In general, biceps brachii MEP and CMEP amplitudes (normalized to maximal M-wave (M)) followed a similar pattern of modulation with increases in cycling intensity at both stimulation strengths. Specifically, MEP and CMEP amplitudes increased up until ~150 W and ~100 W when the weak and strong stimulations were used, respectively. Further increases in cycling intensity revealed no changes on MEP or CMEP amplitudes for either stimulation strength. : In general, MEPs and CMEPs changed in a similar manner, suggesting that increases and subsequent plateaus in overall excitability are likely mediated by spinal factors. Interestingly, however, MEP amplitudes were disproportionately larger than CMEP amplitudes as power output increased, despite being initially matched in amplitude, particularly with strong stimulation. This suggests that supraspinal excitability is enhanced to a larger degree than spinal excitability as the power output of arm cycling increases.
我们使用弱刺激强度和强刺激强度,在手臂骑行过程中的多个功率输出水平下,检测皮质脊髓和脊髓的兴奋性。我们在六个不同的功率输出水平(即25、50、100、150、200和250瓦)以及两种刺激强度(即弱刺激与强刺激)下,通过对运动皮层进行磁刺激和对皮质脊髓轴突进行电刺激,在肱二头肌中诱发运动诱发电位(MEP)和颈髓运动诱发电位(CMEP)。总体而言,肱二头肌MEP和CMEP的幅度(相对于最大M波(M)进行归一化)在两种刺激强度下,均随着骑行强度的增加呈现出相似的调制模式。具体来说,当使用弱刺激和强刺激时,MEP和CMEP的幅度分别在约150瓦和100瓦之前增加。骑行强度的进一步增加显示,两种刺激强度下的MEP或CMEP幅度均无变化。总体而言,MEP和CMEP的变化方式相似,这表明整体兴奋性的增加及随后的平台期可能由脊髓因素介导。然而,有趣的是,尽管最初MEP和CMEP的幅度匹配,但随着功率输出的增加,尤其是在强刺激下,MEP的幅度比CMEP的幅度大得多。这表明随着手臂骑行功率输出的增加,脊髓上兴奋性的增强程度大于脊髓兴奋性。