BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science University of Edinburgh United Kingdom.
Royal Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy United Kingdom.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e012307. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012307. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Background Sex-specific criteria are recommended for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, but the impact of these on presenting characteristics is unknown. Methods and Results We evaluated patient-reported symptoms in 1941 patients (39% women) with suspected acute coronary syndrome attending the emergency department in a substudy of a prospective trial. Standardized criteria defined typical and atypical presentations based on pain nature, location, radiation, and additional symptoms. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction was adjudicated using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay with sex-specific thresholds (>16 ng/L women, >34 ng/L men). Patients identified who were missed by the contemporary assay with a uniform threshold (≥50 ng/L) were reclassified by this approach. Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 16% (184/1185) of men and 12% (90/756) of women, with 9 (5%) men and 27 (30%) women reclassified using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and sex-specific thresholds. Chest pain was the presenting symptom in 91% (1081/1185) of men and 92% (698/756) of women. Typical symptoms were more common in women than in men with myocardial infarction (77% [69/90] versus 59% [109/184]; P=0.007), and differences were similar in those reclassified (74% [20/27] versus 44% [4/9]; P=0.22). The presence of ≥3 typical features was associated with a positive likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women (positive likelihood ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31) but not in men (positive likelihood ratio 1.09; 95% CI, 0.96-1.24). Conclusions Typical symptoms are more common and have greater predictive value in women than in men with myocardial infarction whether or not they are diagnosed using sex-specific criteria. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01852123.
目前推荐使用性别特异性标准来诊断心肌梗死,但这些标准对患者临床表现的影响尚不清楚。
我们在一项前瞻性试验的子研究中,评估了 1941 例(39%为女性)疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的报告症状。根据疼痛性质、位置、放射范围和其他症状,使用标准化标准定义了典型和非典型表现。使用高敏肌钙蛋白 I 检测,结合性别特异性界值(女性>16ng/L,男性>34ng/L)来确定心肌梗死的诊断。使用统一的界值(≥50ng/L)对当前检测方法漏诊的患者进行重新分类。16%(184/1185)的男性和 12%(90/756)的女性被诊断为 1 型心肌梗死,其中 9 例(5%)男性和 27 例(30%)女性经高敏肌钙蛋白 I 检测和性别特异性界值重新分类。胸痛是 91%(1081/1185)的男性和 92%(698/756)的女性的首发症状。心肌梗死患者中,女性的典型症状比男性更常见(77%[69/90]与 59%[109/184];P=0.007),重新分类患者中也存在类似差异(74%[20/27]与 44%[4/9];P=0.22)。≥3 个典型特征的存在与女性心肌梗死诊断的阳性似然比相关(阳性似然比,1.18;95%CI,1.03-1.31),但与男性无关(阳性似然比,1.09;95%CI,0.96-1.24)。
无论是否使用性别特异性标准诊断,心肌梗死女性的典型症状更常见,且对诊断的预测价值更大。