Garg Suchika, Wynne Karen, Omoyinmi Ebun, Eleftheriou Despina, Brogan Paul
Infection, Inflammation and Rheumatology Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019 Feb 12;3(1):rkz004. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkz004. eCollection 2019.
The aim was to carry out a retrospective review of the efficacy and safety of anakinra in paediatric patients with undifferentiated autoinflammatory disease (uAID).
We carried out a retrospective study of children with uAID at a single quaternary centre. The clinical efficacy of anakinra was evaluated using physician global assessment (PGA) and serological response assessed by levels of serum amyloid A and CRP. Safety was assessed by exploring adverse events, including infection and drug reactions.
This study included 22 patients, 64% females and 36% males of median age 7.1 years (range 0.13-14.11 years), with uAID. The median starting dose of anakinra was 2 mg/kg (range 2-6 mg/kg) and the median duration of treatment 19.6 months (range 0.8-100 months). Before anakinra treatment, the median PGA, on a three-point Likert scale, was 2 (range 1-2), which fell to 1 (range 0-2) within 3 months of treatment. Eight of 22 (36%) patients achieved complete clinical and serological remission; 8/22 (36%) achieved a partial response; and 6/22 (28%) had no response to anakinra. Adverse events included death (3/22, 14%) and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (1/22, 5%). There were no new safety signals, and anakinra was well tolerated overall.
Retrospectively, 72% of children with uAID responded well to anakinra, with 36% achieving full clinical and serological remission within 3 months. This suggests that empirical trials of IL-1 blockade might be warranted in children with uAID. Clear stopping criteria based on predefined parameters should be considered, because non-responders required alternative therapies, facilitated by a definitive molecular diagnosis where possible.
对阿那白滞素在未分化型自身炎症性疾病(uAID)儿科患者中的疗效和安全性进行回顾性研究。
我们在一家单一的四级中心对uAID患儿进行了一项回顾性研究。使用医生整体评估(PGA)评估阿那白滞素的临床疗效,并通过血清淀粉样蛋白A和CRP水平评估血清学反应。通过探索不良事件(包括感染和药物反应)来评估安全性。
本研究纳入了22例uAID患者,其中64%为女性,36%为男性,中位年龄7.1岁(范围0.13 - 14.11岁)。阿那白滞素的中位起始剂量为2mg/kg(范围2 - 6mg/kg),中位治疗持续时间为19.6个月(范围0.8 - 100个月)。在阿那白滞素治疗前,PGA在三点李克特量表上的中位评分为2(范围1 - 2),在治疗3个月内降至1(范围0 - 2)。22例患者中有8例(36%)实现了完全临床和血清学缓解;8/22(36%)实现了部分缓解;6/22(28%)对阿那白滞素无反应。不良事件包括死亡(3/22,14%)和异基因造血干细胞移植(1/22,5%)。未发现新的安全信号,总体上阿那白滞素耐受性良好。
回顾性研究表明,72%的uAID患儿对阿那白滞素反应良好,36%在3个月内实现了完全临床和血清学缓解。这表明对于uAID患儿,可能有必要进行白细胞介素-1阻断的经验性试验。应考虑基于预定义参数的明确停药标准,因为无反应者需要替代疗法,如有可能,可通过明确的分子诊断来促进。