Nakagawa Risa, Hiep Nguyen Canh, Ouchi Hirofumi, Sato Yasunori, Harada Kenichi
Department of Human Pathology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, 920-8640, Japan.
Med Mol Morphol. 2020 Mar;53(1):42-49. doi: 10.1007/s00795-019-00230-9. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
The biliary tract cancer (BTC) covers a range of carcinomas, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (perihilar CC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC), defined according to the anatomical location. These adenocarcinomas mostly comprise biliary epithelial cell-derived malignant cells. In addition to anatomical differences, there are morphological and biological differences in BTC starting from embryonic development of the tissues extending to physiological differences. Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are closely associated with the energy metabolism. Using surgical specimens from 74 BTCs, we performed immunohistochemistry for FABP5 and its associated molecules, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), PPARγ coactivator 1 (PGC-1), and estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα). We found that the expression patterns of small BTCs (ICC and CoCC) considerably differed from those of large BTCs (perihilar CC, ECC, and GBC). Expression of FABP5 and PGC-1 in large BTCs was high compared with those of small BTCs, but no difference in the expression of PPARγ and ERRα was observed. FABP5 appears to play a role in malignant progression in large BTCs. Small and large BTCs possess different energy metabolism systems owing to their different anatomical locations and course of carcinogenesis, although all BTCs originate from biliary epithelial cells.
胆管癌(BTC)涵盖一系列癌,包括肝内胆管癌(ICC)、胆管细胞癌(CoCC)、肝门周围胆管癌(肝门周围CC)、肝外胆管癌(ECC)和胆囊癌(GBC),这些是根据解剖位置定义的。这些腺癌大多由胆管上皮细胞衍生的恶性细胞组成。除了解剖学差异外,从组织的胚胎发育到生理差异,胆管癌在形态学和生物学上也存在差异。脂肪酸结合蛋白(FABPs)与能量代谢密切相关。我们使用74例胆管癌的手术标本,对FABP5及其相关分子进行了免疫组织化学检测,这些相关分子包括过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)、PPARγ共激活因子1(PGC-1)和雌激素相关受体α(ERRα)。我们发现小胆管癌(ICC和CoCC)的表达模式与大胆管癌(肝门周围CC、ECC和GBC)的表达模式有很大差异。与小胆管癌相比,大胆管癌中FABP5和PGC-1的表达较高,但未观察到PPARγ和ERRα表达的差异。FABP5似乎在大胆管癌的恶性进展中起作用。尽管所有胆管癌均起源于胆管上皮细胞,但小胆管癌和大胆管癌由于其不同的解剖位置和致癌过程而具有不同的能量代谢系统。