Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mov Disord. 2019 Dec;34(12):1761-1773. doi: 10.1002/mds.27821. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
DBS of the ventral intermediate nucleus is an extremely effective treatment for essential tremor, although a waning benefit is observed after a variable time in a variable proportion of patients (ranging from 0% to 73%), a concept historically defined as "tolerance." Tolerance is currently an established concept in the medical community, although there is debate on its real existence. In fact, very few publications have actually addressed the problem, thus making tolerance a typical example of science based on "eminence rather than evidence." The underpinnings of the phenomena associated with the progressive loss of DBS benefit are not fully elucidated, although the interplay of different-not mutually exclusive-factors has been advocated. In this viewpoint, we gathered the evidence explaining the progressive loss of benefit observed after DBS. We grouped these factors in three categories: disease-related factors (tremor etiology and progression); surgery-related factors (electrode location, microlesional effect and placebo); and stimulation-related factors (not optimized stimulation, stimulation-induced side effects, habituation, and tremor rebound). We also propose possible pathophysiological explanations for the phenomenon and define a nomenclature of the associated features: early versus late DBS failure; tremor rebound versus habituation (to be preferred over tolerance). Finally, we provide a practical approach for preventing and treating this loss of DBS benefit, and we draft a possible roadmap for the research to come. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
腹侧中间核的 DBS 是治疗原发性震颤的一种非常有效的方法,尽管在一定比例的患者中(从 0%到 73%不等),在不同时间后会观察到疗效逐渐减弱,这一现象历史上被定义为“耐受”。尽管对其真实存在存在争议,但耐受目前是医学界的一个既定概念。事实上,很少有出版物真正解决了这个问题,因此耐受是一个典型的基于“权威而非证据”的科学范例。与 DBS 获益逐渐丧失相关的现象的根本原因尚未完全阐明,尽管已经提出了不同的(非相互排斥的)因素相互作用。在这个观点中,我们收集了解释 DBS 后观察到的获益逐渐丧失的证据。我们将这些因素分为三类:疾病相关因素(震颤病因和进展);手术相关因素(电极位置、微损伤效应和安慰剂);和刺激相关因素(未优化刺激、刺激诱导的副作用、习惯化和震颤反弹)。我们还提出了可能的病理生理学解释,并定义了相关特征的命名法:早期与晚期 DBS 失败;震颤反弹与习惯化(优于耐受)。最后,我们提供了一种预防和治疗这种 DBS 获益丧失的实用方法,并为未来的研究制定了一个可能的路线图。国际帕金森病和运动障碍协会,2019 年。