Division of Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada.
J Knee Surg. 2021 Feb;34(3):233-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694984. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
The role of hypersensitivity in implant-related complications remains controversial. The objectives of our study were to (1) establish the prevalence of hypersensitivity to components of knee prostheses in patients referred to our contact dermatitis clinic, (2) determine if patients with post-surgery dermatitis have become sensitized, and (3) describe the outcome of patients with and without hypersensitivity. We reviewed the charts of patients referred from 2007 to 2018 and extracted demographic information, date, type, and site of implant, clinical presentation, and results of patch testing (PT) or lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT). We called most patients to gather data such as clinical outcome, nature, and timing of additional surgery. Statistical analysis included computation of conventional descriptive statistics. Because of the type of study design, only some categorical variables were tested for possible associations by analytical tools (cross-tabulation). Thirty-nine patients, 23 men (59.0%), and 16 women (41.0%), were included. Their mean age in years was 63.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.9-65.7) ranging from 39.0 to 79.0, (standard deviation) = 9.69, without statistically significant differences between males and females. Five patients had positive PT possibly relevant to their implant. Four patients had revision surgery and two improved. Of nine patients with dermatitis, one with relevant PT did not improve after revision, and the dermatitis was unrelated to TKA in eight. Of the 26 patients without dermatitis or relevant PT results, 9 had revisions because of incapacitating symptoms, and 5 improved. Hypersensitivity to implant components is a potential factor in the etiology of TKA complications. Patients with confirmed hypersensitivity may benefit from revision. Our study, however, did not detect statistically significant differences in outcome of revision surgery between patients with positive versus negative PT or LTT. In spite of this, we consider that patients with a history suggestive of metal, acrylate or aminoglycoside allergy should be tested preoperatively to avoid hypersensitivity-related postoperative complications. In the absence of hypersensitivity, some patients with incapacitating symptoms may also improve following revision.
超敏反应在植入物相关并发症中的作用仍存在争议。我们的研究目的是:(1)确定在被转诊至我们接触性皮炎诊所的患者中,对膝关节假体成分产生超敏反应的患病率;(2)确定术后发生皮炎的患者是否已致敏;以及 (3)描述有和无超敏反应患者的结局。我们回顾了 2007 年至 2018 年转诊来的患者病历,并提取了人口统计学信息、日期、植入物类型和部位、临床表现以及斑贴试验 (PT) 或淋巴细胞转化试验 (LTT) 的结果。我们通过电话联系了大多数患者,以收集有关临床结局、再次手术的性质和时间等数据。统计分析包括常规描述性统计的计算。由于研究设计的类型,仅通过分析工具(交叉表)对一些分类变量进行了可能关联的检验。39 名患者,23 名男性 (59.0%) 和 16 名女性 (41.0%),被纳入研究。他们的平均年龄为 63.3 岁 (95%置信区间 [CI]:60.9-65.7),范围为 39.0 岁至 79.0 岁,(标准差) = 9.69,男性和女性之间无统计学差异。5 名患者的 PT 可能与他们的植入物相关,结果呈阳性。4 名患者进行了翻修手术,其中 2 名患者的病情得到改善。9 名患有皮炎的患者中,1 名与 PT 相关的患者在翻修后未得到改善,而 8 名患者的皮炎与 TKA 无关。在 26 名无皮炎或相关 PT 结果的患者中,有 9 名因症状严重而接受了翻修,有 5 名患者的病情得到改善。对植入物成分的超敏反应是 TKA 并发症病因的一个潜在因素。已确诊超敏反应的患者可能从翻修中受益。然而,我们的研究并未检测到 PT 或 LTT 阳性与阴性患者翻修手术结局之间存在统计学差异。尽管如此,我们认为有金属、丙烯酸盐或氨基糖苷类抗生素过敏史的患者应在术前进行测试,以避免与超敏反应相关的术后并发症。在没有超敏反应的情况下,一些有严重症状的患者在翻修后也可能会得到改善。