• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包装正视图上成分项目描述对消费前后产品评价的影响。

The Effect of Ingredient Item Depiction on the Packaging Frontal View on Pre- and Post-Consumption Product Evaluations.

作者信息

Timmerman Nicole, Piqueras-Fiszman Betina

机构信息

Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Social Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Foods. 2019 Aug 20;8(8):354. doi: 10.3390/foods8080354.

DOI:10.3390/foods8080354
PMID:31434331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723595/
Abstract

The current research focused on the (in)congruity between pictorial (ingredient item depiction) and textual (ingredient list) information on food packaging, namely, an apple-mango juice. Specifically, the influence of these information sources on expected and perceived flavor intensities, mismatched perceptions, perceived deception, and intention to purchase was studied by taking into account the possible moderating role of consumers' thinking style. Three studies were performed, the first and third at a Dutch University by means of surveys and sensory tests, and the second via an online survey. The results showed that, overall, most consumers did not perceive the incongruity between pictorial and textual information as mismatching. However, a perceived mismatch from packaging, whether originated by the design manipulations or not, did increase perceived deception and lowered willingness to purchase. This effect was robust for both mismatches, among packaging elements (pre-consumption) and from expected and perceived flavor ratios (post-consumption), but was more substantial for the post-consumption mismatch. Although the moderating effect of cognitive processing style regarding expected and perceived flavor ratios from pictorial and textual (ingredient list) information was not confirmed, the results indicated that the effect of salient textual information is substantial, independent of a particular processing style or label usage.

摘要

当前的研究聚焦于食品包装上的图片(成分项目描绘)与文字(成分列表)信息之间的(不)一致性,具体而言,是关于一款苹果芒果汁。具体来说,通过考虑消费者思维方式可能起到的调节作用,研究了这些信息来源对预期和感知到的风味强度、不匹配的认知、感知到的欺骗以及购买意愿的影响。进行了三项研究,第一项和第三项研究在一所荷兰大学通过调查和感官测试开展,第二项研究通过在线调查进行。结果显示,总体而言,大多数消费者并未将图片与文字信息之间的不一致视为不匹配。然而,无论是否源于设计操作,包装上感知到的不匹配确实会增加感知到的欺骗,并降低购买意愿。这种效应对于两种不匹配情况均很显著,一种是包装元素之间(消费前)的不匹配,另一种是预期与感知到的风味比例之间(消费后)的不匹配,但消费后的不匹配更为明显。尽管未证实认知加工方式对图片和文字(成分列表)信息的预期和感知到的风味比例有调节作用,但结果表明,显著的文字信息的影响很大,与特定的加工方式或标签使用无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/9311a589ad30/foods-08-00354-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/b8237ca2e9f3/foods-08-00354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/4bdcd865d42e/foods-08-00354-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/3e70d8ce0bc4/foods-08-00354-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/edd2a12aebcb/foods-08-00354-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/9311a589ad30/foods-08-00354-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/b8237ca2e9f3/foods-08-00354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/4bdcd865d42e/foods-08-00354-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/3e70d8ce0bc4/foods-08-00354-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/edd2a12aebcb/foods-08-00354-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/6723595/9311a589ad30/foods-08-00354-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Ingredient Item Depiction on the Packaging Frontal View on Pre- and Post-Consumption Product Evaluations.包装正视图上成分项目描述对消费前后产品评价的影响。
Foods. 2019 Aug 20;8(8):354. doi: 10.3390/foods8080354.
2
How Strong Is Your Coffee? The Influence of Visual Metaphors and Textual Claims on Consumers' Flavor Perception and Product Evaluation.你的咖啡有多浓?视觉隐喻和文字描述对消费者风味感知及产品评价的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 5;9:53. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00053. eCollection 2018.
3
Factors Influencing Consumers' Perceptions of Food: A Study of Apple Juice Using Sensory and Visual Attention Methods.影响消费者对食品认知的因素:一项运用感官和视觉注意力方法对苹果汁的研究。
Foods. 2019 Nov 3;8(11):545. doi: 10.3390/foods8110545.
4
Touch-flavor transference: Assessing the effect of packaging weight on gustatory evaluations, desire for food and beverages, and willingness to pay.触觉-风味转移:评估包装重量对味觉评价、食品和饮料的渴望程度以及支付意愿的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0186121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186121. eCollection 2017.
5
Seafood Flavor Perception, Liking, Emotion, and Purchase Intent of Coated Peanuts as Affected by Coating Color and Hydrolyzed Squid Peptide Powder.涂层花生的感官感知、喜好、情感和购买意愿受涂层颜色和鱿鱼肽水解粉的影响
J Food Sci. 2019 Jun;84(6):1570-1576. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14638. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Consumers' choice-blindness to ingredient information.消费者对成分信息的选择盲视。
Appetite. 2016 Nov 1;106:2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
Measuring the Effect of Blockchain Extrinsic Cues on Consumers' Perceived Flavor and Healthiness: A Cross-Country Analysis.衡量区块链外在线索对消费者感知风味和健康程度的影响:一项跨国分析。
Foods. 2021 Jun 18;10(6):1413. doi: 10.3390/foods10061413.
8
Relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics.参与度与功能性牛奶甜点购买意向之间的关系。对包装特点的态度的影响。
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.016. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
9
Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?液态奶与植物基替代品的选择驱动因素:消费者对液态奶的认知是什么?
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6125-6138. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Co-Creation with Consumers for Packaging Design Validated through Implicit and Explicit Methods: Exploratory Effect of Visual and Textual Attributes.通过隐式和显式方法验证的与消费者共同创造包装设计:视觉和文本属性的探索性影响
Foods. 2022 Apr 19;11(9):1183. doi: 10.3390/foods11091183.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Allergenicity of Plants Used in Allergological Communication: An Untapped Tool for Prevention.变应性学交流中使用的植物的潜在致敏性:一种未被利用的预防工具。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;12(6):1334. doi: 10.3390/plants12061334.
2
Facilitating Consumers Choice of Healthier Foods: A Comparison of Different Front-of-Package Labelling Schemes Using Slovenian Food Supply Database.促进消费者选择更健康的食品:使用斯洛文尼亚食品供应数据库对不同包装正面标签方案的比较
Foods. 2020 Mar 31;9(4):399. doi: 10.3390/foods9040399.

本文引用的文献

1
How material, visual and verbal cues on packaging influence consumer expectations and willingness to buy: The case of crisps (potato chips) in Spain.包装上的物质、视觉和语言提示如何影响消费者的期望和购买意愿:以西班牙薯片为例。
Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 1):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 29.
2
Consumers' choice-blindness to ingredient information.消费者对成分信息的选择盲视。
Appetite. 2016 Nov 1;106:2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Simply adding the word "fruit" makes sugar healthier: The misleading effect of symbolic information on the perceived healthiness of food.
简单地添加“水果”一词会使糖更健康:象征性信息对食物感知健康度的误导性影响。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
4
The impact of image-size manipulation and sugar content on children's cereal consumption.图像尺寸处理和糖分含量对儿童谷物食品消费量的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature.营养知识对食品标签使用的影响。文献综述。
Appetite. 2015 Sep;92:207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 27.
6
Assimilation and contrast are on the same scale of food anticipated-experienced pleasure divergence.同化和对比在预期-体验愉悦分歧的食物尺度上是相同的。
Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
What information do consumers consider, and how do they look for it, when shopping for groceries online?消费者在网上购买食品杂货时会考虑哪些信息,以及他们如何寻找这些信息?
Appetite. 2015 Jun;89:265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
Determinants of consumer understanding of health claims.消费者理解健康声称的决定因素。
Appetite. 2011 Apr;56(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
9
When emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual processing style and juror bias.当情感战胜理智:个体加工风格与陪审员偏见研究。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):850-77. doi: 10.1002/bsl.939. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK.英国消费者的营养知识,以及他们对食品标签上营养信息的使用和理解。
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045. Epub 2010 May 28.